+1
Building OK from tag, checked a source archive in the dist area and found
no issues, site reports look OK.
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.10, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
We have fixed a few bugs since Apache Commons Configuration 2.10.0 was
released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Configuration
2.10.1.
Apache Commons Configuration 2.10.1 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/2.10.1-RC1
(svn
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons Logging 1.3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons Logging 1.3.1.
(Note that the new release candidate is labeled 1.3.1 and no longer 1.4.0.)
Apache Commons Logging 1.3.1 RC2 is available for review
I am canceling this VOTE and will re-roll as 1.3.1 for PRs.
Gary
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 9:56 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 9:29 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 13:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > For example? The Logback PR
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 9:29 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 13:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > For example? The Logback PR requires Java 11. What else? Logkit? Maybe but
> > I've never heard anyone ask for that.
>
> The two OSGi PRs are important:
>
> *
Hi Gary,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 at 13:45, Gary Gregory wrote:
> For example? The Logback PR requires Java 11. What else? Logkit? Maybe but
> I've never heard anyone ask for that.
The two OSGi PRs are important:
* https://github.com/apache/commons-logging/pull/188: fixes a typo in
the OSGi
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 8:55 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
>
> You don't have to accept the PRs, but they should be addressed. If the
> logback PR requires Java 11, then close it (and maybe check to see if
> there's something in between 1.3.12 and 1.5.3 that logging should
> upgrade to
You don't have to accept the PRs, but they should be addressed. If the
logback PR requires Java 11, then close it (and maybe check to see if
there's something in between 1.3.12 and 1.5.3 that logging should
upgrade to instead).
If logkit isn't going to be supported, cool, but then close the PR
For example? The Logback PR requires Java 11. What else? Logkit? Maybe but
I've never heard anyone ask for that.
Projects have open PRs all the time for dependencies or other reasons,
that's no reason to downvote a release candidate IMO. I prefer RERO to
bigger releases FWIW.
Gary
On Sun, Mar
-1
There are multiple open PRs waiting for review, including apparently
two to upgrade the dependent logging libraries this library is a
facade over, wh9ich seem pretty important. These should be resolved
before cutting the next release.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:49 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons Logging 1.3.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons Logging 1.4.0.
Apache Commons Logging 1.4.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/logging/1.4.0-RC1
(svn
11 matches
Mail list logo
