On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 12/03/2012 17:28, James Carman a écrit :
Would one of the parser libraries not work here?
You think at something like JavaCC or AntLR? Not sure it'll be more
efficient than a handcrafted parser. The CSV format is
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2012 08:45, ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ebourg
Date: Mon Mar 12 08:45:34 2012
New Revision: 1299580
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1299580view=rev
Log:
Serialization test for CSVFormat
Note: this does
Hello Commons-Fellowers,
this is meant for us
Cheers,
Christian
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Nadia Sokolova
nadia.sokol...@icann.org wrote:
Dear Apache Software Foundation,
I am contacting you in regards to the DomainValidator code in Java that you
have listed at:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Gilles Sadowski
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
I'm now trying to figure how to stage the site. [What does stage mean in
this context?]
deploying it to a place which is not the live site
server
idstagingSite/id
usernamerepouser/username
!-- other
Gary,
sounds like that one:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-619
Quote:There is a breadcrumb without an href in your site.xml, please
check if this fixes it. Note that all item elements in site.xml
require a href.
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:37 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 February 2012 23:08, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Hello All:
This VOTE
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Hello All:
This VOTE is to update the platform requirement for Commons Lang trunk to
Java 6 from Java 5.
The reasons are:
- Stop wasting time back porting code
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other
projects at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
Hi Felix and Leandro,
helping hands are very much welcome!
Cheers + good luck!
Christian
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:00 PM, leandro.pezze...@hush.com wrote:
Hi There Felix !
Welcome to the dev zone ! . I am rather new here myself.
Looking forward to your contributions too !
Bye !
Sorry to ask a bit naive, but does cl2.0 make sense with log4j 2.0 in
mind? It seems log4j 2.0 does have such an abstraction and there is
slf4j too. Probably it is time to go dormant instead?
Anyway, if there are some reasons to continue working I would welcome
Torstens approach of course! Not
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi guys,
I was trying to integrate Struts2 with the new api layout.
Unfortunately I realized that due to the introduction of the new checked
CacheException [1] (which basically inherits the Exception class), every
Last mail for today :-)
Today there is a discussion on going, Tapestry vs Struts (on
tapestry-users list). Of course people are convinced of Tapestry, and
actually it is a great framework with huge benefits. And it is pretty
modern. People now say (and not only there) Struts is a dinosaur.
Well,
://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Last mail for today :-)
Today there is a discussion on going, Tapestry vs Struts (on
tapestry-users list). Of course people are convinced
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
But i found only discussions about duration joda-time dated 2004.
(http://markmail.org/thread/733yqv5zwzsngj3j)
Now i really need in Duration functionality (especially such as
Duration.parse(String)).
I heard
Benedikt,
not sure if got you right. But isn't this basically what JUnit provides with:
@Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
Cheers
Christian
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Hi,
while I was working on the unit tests, I had to write
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Am 22.01.2012 18:18, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
@Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
No it isn't. As far as I know, your test will pass, when the first
NullPointerException is thrown (this also applies
Thanks for all the work Lukasz, I appreciate it!!
2012/1/19 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
2012/1/18 Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com:
As I do see that ticket, it is currently properly assigned to and
waiting for Tony Stevenson.
We must wait for INFRA now
Regards
--
Hello Thomas,
and welcome to Commons! Here are tons of components waiting for your
help, glad you are on board.
Cheers
Christian
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Thomas Neidhart
thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
some of you may already recognize my name, as I have contributed some
code
Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
Commons homepage I liked very much. Not sure what was the problem with
that. We should put it on our table again, as the current Commons site
looks like we are jdk 1.3 users (ok, we support 1.3 on some places,
but this does not
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian Grobmeiergrobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually Simone has already brought up a bootstrap'ped variant of the
Commons homepage I liked very
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 16:16, schrieb sebb:
On 16 January 2012 15:02, Christian
big +1
If time allows I might be able to code a few lines myself
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I am here to discuss a possible area to explore for a potential
BeanUtils2 component: I recently came across an
I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again.
As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff, but not to
satisfy the needs of companies who are using outdated jdks. Sometimes
it makes sense, but the for ever support of jdks becomes obsessive.
Rather I would prefer to work with cool
, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/16 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
2011/12/14 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The list is pretty concrete.
It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find it).
Release B is said to be fully-compatible with Release A if B can
simply replace A in (nearly) all circumstances and deployments
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2012 11:42, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The list is pretty concrete.
It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi folks,
the main reason for the failed vote of commons-email-1.3 is that the release
is only source but not binary compatible
+) if you compile your application with the new version everything is fine
+) if you
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:54 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 January 2012 19:37, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi folks,
the main reason for the failed vote of commons-email-1.3
Hello,
Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path=%2Fcommons%2Fproper%2Fjelly
Last release was in 01.2010.
We had already discussion on a process to move proper components into
another state, be it dormant or inactive. I would like
.
Question is how realistic is it we get something hacked together in
for example ruby?
Cheers
Christian
Gary
On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:59, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path
+1 and good luck ;-)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
There is NO change from RC3.
This RC exists because I blew up the Nexus staging repository for RC3
and a new RC is needed for a clean
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the whole formality of project state should be replaced
in svn, jsut indicating in a components
health page at commons.a.o
Gary
2c,
Gary
Gary
On Jan 9, 2012, at 6:59, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Jelly did not see any activity for nearly two years:
http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?path
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Jan 7, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 15:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
When can we drop support for M2?
I guess there are still a lot of m2 users, and for the next few years
there will
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how it is relevant whether commons users use maven 2 or 3.
Even if we require Maven 3 to build a commons component anyone can still
use it in a Maven 2 build. They only would require Maven 3 if they actually
want to
Hello,
we have a nice wikipage mentioning what buildsystem is supported for
which component:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
Can everybody update the lines for the components he is caring about?
For components which do not support maven3 just add a no in the
column - this way we know
:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 8 January 2012 13:50, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
we have a nice wikipage mentioning what buildsystem is supported for
which component:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/BuildSystems
Can everybody
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Commons Convert isn't on the Sandbox list. It supports Ant and Maven 2.
Added it - thanks Adrian.
Cheers
Christian
-Adrian
On 1/8/2012 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
This page is seriously out of date. I
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 8 January 2012 20:41, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
I have myself
, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
I have myself no karma to give you karma, sorry! But I can edit it for
OGNL of course - I think it is m3 ready (have only worked with m3 and
ognl so far). Do you know if it is working with m2?
Cheers
+1
and thanks again for your work!
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC3.
The only change from RC2 is that the build was run from a clean SVN
checkout to avoid issues with using a
Hello Simone,
interesting. If I understand correctly they basically use a
ConcurrentHashMap to put expression in it somewhere at parsing level?
Looking in the current code of ognl, i cannot see such a
functionality. Anyway, everything which is speeding up things is
welcome, imho (ok,almost) ;-)
Hello Gary,
thanks for the hard work!
While testing I saw there hashed asc files online, like:
commons-pool-1.6-sources.jar.asc.md5
To my knowledge they are not necessary and can be removed from Nexus
(just chose and remove).
Notice does include copyright until 2011, but tomorrow is 2012 ;-)
):
Matt Benson: Commons Imaging
Sebastian Bazley: Commons Imaging, Commons ImageIO
Simone Tripodi: Commons ImageIO
3 Non-PMC positives:
Christian Grobmeier: Commons ImageIO
Damjan Jovanovic: Commons Imaging
Konstantin Kolinko: Commons Imaging
-0:
Paul Benedict
-1s:
Mark Thomas (PMC)
PMC
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 28/12/2011 11:06, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
just for the record, I am meanwhile on the pmc :-)
I was just not aware of the page below, I use:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#commons-pmc
Hey there,
I want to mention that I have reserved the G+ brand page Apache Commons
https://plus.google.com/106381282762520124070
At the moment we don't use such stuff, but we probably should do.
Anyway once I can transfer ownership of this page to Commons and once
this project wants to have that
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 23/12/2011 09:32, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
I want to mention that I have reserved the G+ brand page Apache Commons
https://plus.google.com/106381282762520124070
At the moment we don't use such stuff, but we
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 23/12/2011 11:15, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr
wrote:
Le 23/12/2011 09:32, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
I want to mention that I have
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 21.12.2011 17:41, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitzphil.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
applications. We need
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/21/11 11:09 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/12/2011 16:57, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/21/11 9:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, sorry if I ask the same question in the same dumb way all the
time... but we have figured out 1.5 will be binary compatible with
1.6.
We can't we then simply drop 1.5 and go forward with 1.6?
So far i have see
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2011 11:33, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
So far i have see the reason: Tomcat 5.5 runs with jdk1.4.2. Is this
actually the reason we don't go forward? Because another project needs
the 1.5 series?
If this is the case
here,
once this works out.
Cheers
Christian
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 23/12/2011 11:15, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Luc
know or have heard of are doing all the stuff
manually (specifically a few volunteers of the PMC do)
Cheers
Christian
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 23/12/2011 09:32, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Hey there,
I want to mention that I have reserved the G+ brand page Apache Commons
https
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/23/11 7:36 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2011 11:33, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Releases would be more work but there are folks
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/12/2011 14:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
This is a VOTE to [ALL] to rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image.
The drive is to have a meaningful obvious name like [Lang], [IO], [Net],
and so on.
This VOTE is open until
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 21, 2011, at 7:12, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I slightly prefer Imaging to Image as well.
Could also call it JIL - Java Imaging Library - by analogy with JCS and JCI.
Commons Image
Commons Imaging
Commons
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
1.5.x ships with tomcat and is used by lots of other production
applications. We need to maintain the ability to patch it.
Tomcat 5.5 (the oldest stable version i can find) uses Java 5:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/18/11 1:12 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept [graph] as a proper component
[ ] +/- 0 uhm...
[ ] -1 Don't accept it - and please explain why
Open will stay open for 72h and closes on Wed 21th, 8:15 PM CET.
+1 go proper
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 18.12.2011 21:22, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
can't we prepare the release in proper? Maybe it would be easier
attracting more people interested on contributing and get it ready for
a release
2011/12/16 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
2011/12/14 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
dedicate the cmd-c/cmd-v operations of the next
Hello,
cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
dedicate the cmd-c/cmd-v operations of the next days to ognl.
Cheers
Christian
2011/12/14 Łukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com:
Hello,
I
Excellent stuff! Love it to have a chinese translation on hand!
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Then: our actual documentation format is xdoc for maven site - that
support locales[2] (see Internationalization) - so if you could be so
kind to
Hello guys,
we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-3
Now it seems there once was a test instance with the importet set of
ognl issues. I even have asked to get access, but never got it. Now it
is offline:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 December 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
we have ognl-3 (import old issues from opensymphony):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-3
Now it seems there once was a test instance
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 December 2011 12:09, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 December 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys,
we have
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, I think that the lack of generics in commons components drives
away more users than having java 1.4 compatibility retains.
I personally won't incorporate any non-genericized components if I can help
it. There
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 December 2011 12:55, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Now it seems there once was a test instance with the importet set of
ognl issues. I even have asked to get access, but never got it. Now
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
mcucchi...@apache.org wrote:
@Christian
I could be wrong, but AFAIU Looks like the infra team never imported
the OGNL stuff, they declined
Lukasz's request (http://s.apache.org/agN).
Actually it seems having OGNL on board is not
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
[X] +1 release it
Checked sigs/checksums, looked at the site, opened stuff et al worked
all very well for me.
License is included in LICENSE.txt, NOTICE looks correct (as explained
by Sebbs link).
Just one minor
Just curious - jexl is releasing tests? Why that?
commons-jexl-2.1-tests.jar
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-298/org/apache/commons/commons-jexl/2.1/
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Further to the earlier cancelled RC1 vote,
+1 looks good to me
have checked sigs, opened the stuff, looked at license, notice etc.
API docs do contain not all of the copyright statements as on the
website (as discussed in the digester vote).
Cheers,
Christian
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Further to the
+1
checked sigs, site, opened all that stuff, runned test... looks all ok so far.
Not providing a test jar is ok for me (or is this a Commons poilicy??
have missed it somehow) as I can run the tests from the provided src
package.
On Garys comments with M2/M3:
Tests can be run from the source
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
checked sigs, site, opened all that stuff, runned test... looks all ok so
far.
Not providing a test jar is ok for me
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/11/11 11:21 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI: Commons parent makes sure that M2 and M3 works, if you use a recent CP
version
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
[X] +1 release it
Checked the site, the sha1/md5 checksums, opened sources, all fine for me.
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 December 2011 15:40, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
[X] -1 no, do not release it because... (please explain why)
The NOTICE file mentions http://asm.ow2.org/ but the LICENSE file does
not include its LICENSE.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:
Matt Benson-2 wrote
Maybe the right approach is to start with Java 6, then whoever likes to
can
investigate how much work it would take to restore Java 5
compatibility.
Seems like a reasonable proposal to me; it means Java
[+1] Yes, you may release the next major release of JEXL3 with a Java6
requirement
I think the maintainers of a component can decide on their own which
jdk they want to support. If you want to support a newer Java with the
next big major version of JEXL I give you my +1. For me a major
version
Henri,
I would love to see this as a Commons recommendation on the Wiki.
As Stefan mentioned, in Compress we have @experimental annons (I
actually added them).
I like the idea to make up a public, rarely to break interface api and
some not so public sometimes to break implementation. Maybe we
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:43 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 December 2011 15:06, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Salut Henri,
if you need the Java6 APIs to provide a fresh new set of APIs to JEXL
users, I would be +1.
We recently accepted Java6 in Apache Cocoon since
rules. Strictly
speaking, I think we are bound to do so.
Very much +1. There are so many differences. As a user I am totally
lost on all the different things people do.
Cheers
Gary
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
Henri,
I would love to see
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:44 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
+1 to the proposal.
As for moving out of commons I would expect that it would require a vote of
the Commons PMC with approval from the board. I don't know why it would
need to go through the
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 December 2011 16:46, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:
You summed it up pretty well;
Can we participate in moving forward - Java6 is not really the bleeding
edge... - or are we bound to remain on obsolete platforms with Commons ?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 December 2011 18:10, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:
sebb-2-2 wrote
My view is that while there is still a need for software to be able to
run on Java 1.5, we should not insist on requiring a minimum of
1.6.*unless* there is
possible when the actual maintainers would like
to use a current platform - this needs no discussion imho, they should
simply do as they please.
Cheers
Matt
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think all that Sebastian is saying is something like if you can
Henri,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:14 PM, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:
Just a simple question to Sebb;
Do you intend to pursue and release 2.1 or just leave it as is?
This sounds somehow frustrated. Am I wrong?
Cheers
Christian
Regards,
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:14 PM, henrib hen...@apache.org wrote:
Of course I am frustrated; I'm old enough to know it will pass...
More importantly, I now need to re-evaluate whether JEXL as an Apache
Commons project is a library I can continue to use and recommend for
professional usage; it
Gentlemen,
big +1 from me too to speed up and stop the slavery of the 100 mad
fix me rules. I will gladly vote +1 to releases which pass the unit
tests but do not fulfill the maven reports (as long as I can't see
really nasty bugs).
Cheers,
Christian
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Simone
Simo,
I love the new skin. I would love to see this instead of the old stuff
for commons. Who really is attracted by a site design like that we
have now (in times of designed computers, iphones etc)? It seems to me
many youngster contribute to the projects with the best looking sites,
not to the
Cool! Thanks Stefan for pushing it!
I cannot see the release on the webpage (and the download cgi is not
avail at the moment). Is it due to synchronization?
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Commons Compress team is pleased to
/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 2 November 2011 12:07, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot see the release on the webpage (and the download cgi is not
avail at the moment). Is it due to synchronization?
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
Hello Michael,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Michael Kuß m...@michael-kuss.de wrote:
It is ok for me if it is fixed some time in the future.
Yes, that was this Markus Kuss. Although I requested it to be
changed to Christian Grobmeier.
Just do not go into too much trouble.
for some reason
I thought we were talking about gigs here.
About 100 MB if I leave the eleven zips as individual files. Better
don't try to do a svn checkout over a slow line then.
Thanks Stefan for not excluding me from the compress project.
I need 50 minutes for checking out 100 MB, but only if Telekom is
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
looks like last good build.xml commit was done by Niall in the far
2008 - since [functor] joined the proper recently and I'd like to cut
a RC soon, I propose to drop ant support.
+1
What are plans for ant builds
for sending this link.
Cheers
Christian
Cheers, Adrian.
On Oct 16, 2011, at 1:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
looks like last good build.xml commit was done by Niall in the far
2008 - since
Sorry:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/changes.html#class_action
This MUST be the name of the developer as described in the developers
section of the pom.xml file.
Is it really the id of the pom.xml? I understood it so as it would be the name?
No preference, just want to
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2011 20:15, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I was not aware that the name also had to be included in the developer
section; I guess that may be used to add some cross-linking.
Perhaps do some
Again, the old discussion.
OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I
prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn
history.
In addition:
* $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $
This line must not be the first of the license
101 - 200 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
