Re: [all] Should we use MathJaX in Javadoc on all repos? (Was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-58) Javadoc: Use MathJaX)

> On 05/04/2019 09:27, sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 12:28, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> For those unfamiliar with MathJaX, is the javascript mechanism for > >> accommodating for LaTeX (the math typesetting language, written by Donald > >> Knuth) in html. > >> > >> It could be convenient

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

. > > Regards, > Gilles > > > PS: Thanks for the feedback! > > > > Regards, > > Abhishek > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:34 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > > Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 23:54, Abhishek Dhadwal a > > > écrit : >

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

t; benchmark tests on the SecureRandom algorithms as discussed ? If so, are > there any guidelines/ data on doing so ? This is in module "commons-rng-examples/exmaples-jmh". Regards, Gilles > PS: Thanks for the feedback! > > Regards, > Abhishek > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:34 AM Gille

Re: [all] Should we use MathJaX in Javadoc on all repos?

> > For those unfamiliar with MathJaX, is the javascript mechanism for > accommodating for LaTeX (the math typesetting language, written by Donald > Knuth) in html. > > It could be convenient to use mathematical notation in our javadoc generally. +1 > That said, Java doesn’t do this so it

Re: [Rng] New stress test application

> [...] > > I did have a look at getting more hardware information to add to the output > reports. With this library: > > https://github.com/oshi/oshi > > I added a command to output system information about the processor: > > java -jar target/rng-utils.jar system >

Re: [Rng] New stress test application

Hi Alex. Le mer. 3 avr. 2019 à 17:55, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I have decided to demonstrate where I am with the stress test > application. A small project to add command-line support using Picocli > ballooned into a lot of new code. Here's a PR with the new code: > >

Re: [lang] Towards 3.9

> Any thoughts on doing a 3.9 release of [lang]. I think Benedikt want’s us to > go up with what we have. Any thoughts for or against doing a release? Any objection to fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LANG/issues/LANG-1442 ? Gilles

Re: [GSoC] Submission of Final Draft for GSoC Proposal

Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 23:54, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Alex sir and Giles sir, > May I submit the final draft for the proposal, or should I make any changes > before submission ? > The drive Link for the proposal: : >

Re: [GSoC] Agile approach to project mentoring

Hello. Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 à 16:43, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > The GSoC guidelines for students writing a proposal [1] is to use the > guidelines or templates of the organization. It then states that certain > elements will improve chances of a proposal including in Deliverables: > > "a brief,

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. Le mer. 27 mars 2019 à 13:43, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > > Hello Sir, > > >I don't know what are the hard requirements for the schedule, but > >I would not make such delineation between coding, reviewing and > >testing. > The Elements Of A Quality Proposal in Google’s Guide >

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

iew the document again and check if there are any more final > changes required ? > And, Alex sir, are there any changes required on the document ? Could you > review it too ? Feedback would be highly appreciated ! > > Regards, > Abhishek > > Sent from Mail for Windows

Re: [numbers-fraction] merging changes

ommit I made to "commons-numbers-fraction", more than 3 months ago, is: ---CUT--- commit d0cff0d8f2a249e6c87df323fe635386749f62f4 Author: Gilles Sadowski Date: Mon Dec 17 12:59:24 2018 +0100 NUMBERS-83: Replace calls to JDK deprecated API. ---CUT--- So I've no idea about wha

Re: [All][RNG][Numbers] Broken links on the generated site

Anyone has a clue about those issues? Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 16:48, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > Hi. > > Somehow, that page contains invalid links (for un/subscribe): > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/mailing-lists.html > > Furthermore, the page itself has

Re: [Rng] JDK 11 javadoc support for JPMS modules

Hello. Le lun. 25 mars 2019 à 13:00, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I managed to get the build working for the site on JDK 11. > > https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/32 > > However left as-is it does not work for the java 9 modules that use JPMS > due to the javadoc tool in JDK 11.0.2. > >

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Thanks for the document. I've made some comments. Let's see whether Alex has something to add. Regards, Gilles Le lun. 25 mars 2019 à 14:30, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > The revised GSoC proposal has been created(minus the about me section), and > the Google Docs link is

Re: [commons-rng] 01/04: RNG-82: Add XorShift1024StarPhi generator

Hi. Nit-pick: Order of constructor arguments (see below). Le lun. 25 mars 2019 à 13:08, a écrit : > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aherbert pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git > > commit

Re: [Rng] PractRand

JIRA report created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/RNG/issues/RNG-86 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Rng] User Guide Quality section

> [...] I think that we mostly agreed in another thread. > > Summary of my proposals: > > - Keep the order in the user guide as is but move MT next to MT_64 > - Auto generate the GeneratorsList from the RandomSource enum > - Update all the file names and the user guide to point to the renamed

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 18:42, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > Dear Sir, > Honestly, I've no idea about whether this schedule is realistic. I mean: > Assuming full-time commitment, it could probably be finished much faster. ;-) > Oh, okay. As per your estimates, how many days should I

Re: [Rng] PractRand

Hi. Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 16:55, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Has this testing suite been investigated: > > PractRand > > http://pracrand.sourceforge.net/ I didn't know about it, until coming across from the "Middle-square Weyl PRNG" page. > > It may provide a

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi Abhishek. Overall it looks good to me (but I'm not used to laying out GSoC proposals so it might be good to have additional comments). I've added a few remarks in the text (see below). Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 13:09, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > > I’ve added skeletal draft of my

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

> > Hi. > > > > I see that you use Java 11. > > Can you try with a different version? > > We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9. > > > > Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix > > that issue (confirmed to also happen with Java 10). > > I think

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. I see that you use Java 11. Can you try with a different version? We only know that the build should work with Java 6, 7, 8, and 9. Actually, it would be a nice "micro-task" to figure out how to fix that issue (confirmed to also happen with Java 10). Regards, Gilles Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hello. Le sam. 23 mars 2019 à 16:35, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > After running $mvn package, I get: > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > [INFO] > > [INFO] Total time: 19:08 min > [INFO] Finished at:

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi Abhishek. Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 19:48, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > > > > >Well then, I guess that we consider the micro-tasks which I evoked in > > my previous message: Clone the repository and build the code. > > This is explained in more details here: > >

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hello. Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 14:48, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sir, > >I don't understand what you mean be "screening tests". Sorry. > Certain organisations had held certain micro tasks to be performed by > students in order to increase their chances of selection for the project. I

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi. Le ven. 22 mars 2019 à 08:28, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > > Dear sir, > > >>But first things first: Have you set up a programming environment for > making your experiments? > I have IntelliJ IDEA community edition along with Netbeans 8.2 with Java > 8u191 installed. > For repository

Re: [all] What versions of java do we support?

Hello. Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 19:13, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > Hello all, > > I would think that with the Amazon Corretto play at long term support for > java 8 and 11 we would want to build using the latest version of the Corretto > 8-JDK, and we would want to ensure that we work for Java

Re: GSoC 19: Information pertaining to 'Lagged Fibonacci Generators'

Hi Abhishek. Le jeu. 21 mars 2019 à 17:14, Abhishek Dhadwal a écrit : > > Dear Sirs/Ma’ams, >I am Abhishek Singh Dhadwal, a student currently pursuing a Bachelor’s > Degree in the field of Computer Science and Engineering in Visvesvaraya > National Institute of Technology, Nagpur,

[All][RNG][Numbers] Broken links on the generated site

Hi. Somehow, that page contains invalid links (for un/subscribe): http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/mailing-lists.html Furthermore, the page itself has a different name than for other components, e.g.: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-collections/mail-lists.html

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

> [...] > >>> If the user forgets to supply one, the program outputs one, and stops; > >>> then the user reissues the command? > >> Yes: > >> > >> > java -jar examples-stress.jar -h > >> > >> Print something helpful > >> > >> > java -jar examples-stress.jar --template > >> > >> Print a

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. >>>[...] > > If the user forgets to supply one, the program outputs one, and stops; > > then the user reissues the command? > > Yes: > > > java -jar examples-stress.jar -h > > Print something helpful > > > java -jar examples-stress.jar --template > > Print a template generators list to

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

undefined Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 21:39, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 20 Mar 2019, at 18:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >>> [...] > >>> Perhaps the "RandomStressTester" should be made more flexible > >>> an

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

>> [...] > > Perhaps the "RandomStressTester" should be made more flexible > > and, instead of a hard-coded "GeneratorsList", accept a list of "enum" > > identifiers. e.g. a list (ASCII file) like: > > MT 3 > > MT_64 3 > > SPLIT_MIX_64 3 > > [etc.] > > where the second columns indicates how many

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 15:04, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 20/03/2019 13:08, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >> - Perhaps there is another place for them? > >> > >> I am happy to not clutter the source repo and keep them somewhere for > >>

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Hi Eric. Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 20:02, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:48 AM Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > There are also a couple of CM packages that would be worth porting > > to [Numbers] or their own component: > >

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

>> [...] > > I was thinking of a utility for taking the output (of several runs) of > > the test > > suites and generate the table in "apt" format (with correct links). > > I previously did a lot of this when testing the cache of the int and > boolean values. I could not find the scripts on local

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi Alex. Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 01:32, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 19 Mar 2019, at 15:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> > >> I am currently rerunning the dieharder test for the XorShift1024Star > >> composites since that requires a littl

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. > > [...] > Given all the stress tests will be rerun shall I go ahead and reorder > the existing files, user guide .apt file and the GeneratorsList to be in > the order of the RandomSource enum? > >>> We could wait for the new results before updating the site. > >> I

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 10:26, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 19 Mar 2019, at 10:35, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >>> [...] > >> > >> Given all the stress tests will be rerun shall I go ahead and reorder the > >>

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

> > [...] > >> So leave the testing to just ints and document on the user guide that is > >> what we are testing. > > > > +1 > > OK. That seems simplest. > > Given all the stress tests will be rerun shall I go ahead and reorder the > existing files, user guide .apt file and the GeneratorsList to

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 16:49, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 18/03/2019 14:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > > >>>> [...] > >>>> > >>>> One actual issue is that we are testing long providers using the long to > >>

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi. >>> [...] > >> > >> One actual issue is that we are testing long providers using the long to > >> create 2 int values. Should we test using a series of the upper 32 bits > >> and then a series of the lower 32 bits? > > > > Is that useful since the test now sees the integers as they are

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le dim. 17 mars 2019 à 01:01, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 16 Mar 2019, at 23:10, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 16 Mar 2019, at 02:54, Gilles Sadowski >> <mailto:gillese...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>> T

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 19:03, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > PS. Did you try this test program to check the size of the unsigned long? I'm on 64-bits Debian GNU/Linux, so... sizeof(int) = 4 sizeof(long) = 8 sizeof(unsigned long) = 8 sizeof(uint32_t) = 4 sizeof(double) = 8 [... same as yours, below

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi. Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 19:00, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 15 Mar 2019, at 17:37, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi Alex. > > > > Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 14:08, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> FYI. > >> &g

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi Alex. Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 14:08, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > FYI. > > > I am going to update stdin2testu01.c so that it passes all the input bits > > to TestU01 and try again. > > > > I’ve read some of the code and manual of TestU01 and the values that are > > returned from the

Re: [Rng] User Guide Quality section

Hello. Le jeu. 14 mars 2019 à 12:58, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I've just added a Jira task to add the new XorShiRo generaters to the > user guide. > > I note that the order of the RNGs in the *Quality* section does not > match the order of the RandomSource enum, nor is it alphabetical. The >

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello Alex. Le mer. 13 mars 2019 à 15:37, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On 13/03/2019 02:20, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 22:34, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> > >>> On 12 Mar 2019, at 17:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > &

Re: [Rng] Merge outstanding PRs for construction speed baseline

Le mer. 13 mars 2019 à 00:19, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 12 Mar 2019, at 16:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > [Replying to the ML.] > > > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 13:00, Alex Herbert > <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit :

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 22:34, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 12 Mar 2019, at 17:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > [Replying to list.] > > > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 15:39, Alex Herbert > <mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > &

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

; On Tuesday, 12 March 2019, 1:24:24 pm NZDT, Eric Barnhill < > > ericbarnh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:56 PM Gilles Sadowski > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Eric. > > > > > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 22:22,

Re: [GSoC] Example Issues From 2018 or upcoming 2019

Hi Rob. Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 16:09, Rob Tompkins a écrit : > > Hey guys (or maybe Gilles specifically), > > It looks like a good example for GSoC jira issues is: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-32 > . Sure; all labels should be fixed

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

[Replying to list.] Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 15:39, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 12/03/2019 15:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi Alex. > > Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 12:53, Alex Herbert a écrit > : > > On 11/03/2019 23:44, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. &

Re: [Rng] Merge outstanding PRs for construction speed baseline

[Replying to the ML.] Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 13:00, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 11/03/2019 23:54, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 18:12, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'd like to start on improving the metho

[Geometry] GSoC 2019

Hello. If there are tasks which you think could be completed as part of GSoC, now is the time to advertize them on JIRA (by applying the label "gsoc2019"). Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

at of course (DRY), but in practice, I've witnessed from up close (it happened right here) that people prefer duplication over modularization ("dogfooding"). Best, Gilles > > CheersBruno > > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019, 1:24:24 pm NZDT, Eric Barnhill > wrote: >

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Hello. Le mar. 12 mars 2019 à 01:24, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 4:56 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hi Eric. > > > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 22:22, Eric Barnhill a > > écrit : > > > > > > I am definitely willin

Re: [Rng] Merge outstanding PRs for construction speed baseline

Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 18:12, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Hi, > > I'd like to start on improving the methods in rng-simple to create the > RandomSource. > > There are a few PRs outstanding but I think the discussion on this list > was that the new XoShiRo generators are OK. So I would like to merge

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. Le jeu. 7 mars 2019 à 00:44, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 22:57, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >>> > >>> However I will test if XorShift1024Star and XorShift1024StarPhi are > >>> correlated just fo

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

> > And if we can go forward, I would like to contact that kid and give him > first crack at the stats library -- he went to all the trouble to make a > nice proposal for it and everything last year... > > Eric > > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:14 PM Gilles Sado

Re: [Parent] RAT check

Le sam. 9 mars 2019 à 23:45, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Hi all: > > How about making apache-rat:check run automatically in commons-parent? In > the Maven validate phase? > > That would mean one less thing to check when integrating a patch and > validating an RC. +1 [Why not?] Gilles > > Gary

Re: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

s > Bruno > > > > > On Saturday, 9 March 2019, 9:14:24 am NZDT, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > Anyone willing to apply (cf. message below)? > > Regards, > Gilles > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Ulrich S

Fwd: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration

Hi. Anyone willing to apply (cf. message below)? Regards, Gilles -- Forwarded message - From: Ulrich Stärk Date: ven. 8 mars 2019 à 20:49 Subject: Google Summer of Code 2019 Mentor Registration To: Cc: d...@community.apache.org Dear PMCs, I'm happy to announce that the ASF

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 23:07, Alex Herbert a écrit :> > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 21:42, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 6 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> Le mer. 6 mars 2019

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hello. Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 21:49, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 17:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Do the two variants produce uncorrelated sequences? > > I will test this when I branch a new PR for just this code. IMHO, it's stra

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 16:50, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I would like to merge this PR introducing the new XoShiRo generators: > > https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/20 > > > Can I get a review to check that nothing is obviously bad. In the

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 17:27, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 6 Mar 2019, at 16:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi Alex. > > > > Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 16:50, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> I would like to merge

Re: [Rng] New XoShiRo generators

Hi Alex. Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 16:50, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I would like to merge this PR introducing the new XoShiRo generators: > > https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/20 > > > Can I get a review to check that nothing is obviously

Re: [ALL] Avoiding duplication of work between GitHub PRs and JIRA

Hi. Le mer. 6 mars 2019 à 15:20, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > > I think for all non cosmetic changes there should be jira issue for the PR. +1 > Source code platforms can come and go (think of SourceForge) so we should > not rely on the GitHub PR as documentation. +1 And I'd like to stress

Re: [numbers-fraction] Maven surefire plugin error

Le mar. 5 mars 2019 à 00:29, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > On 4 Mar 2019, at 23:10, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le lun. 4 mars 2019 à 23:21, Eric Barnhill a écrit > > : > >> > >> I am getting a maven error for the s

Re: [numbers-fraction] Maven surefire plugin error

Hi. Le lun. 4 mars 2019 à 23:21, Eric Barnhill a écrit : > > I am getting a maven error for the surefire plugin, but don't see it listed > as a dependency in numbers-fraction or numbers-core. I see it listed in > numbers-parent, but with no version number. Any ideas what I need to do to > get

Re: [Rng] Sonar 'bugs'

Hi. Le dim. 3 mars 2019 à 17:34, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I noted that the Sonar job is no longer failing on Jenkins. Well done for > fixing it. Thanks go to Gavin (INFRA): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17873 > > I looked at the report and it has two bugs for testing

Re: [ALL][RFC] Github subjects don't contain the repo name

+1 Le ven. 1 mars 2019 à 22:27, sebb a écrit : > > The [GitHub] messages sent by g...@apache.org don't say what repo they relate > to. > > This make it difficult to know which component is involved. > > Sometimes the subject includes a JIRA issue, but many subjects give no clue. > > I think it

Re: [CANCEL][LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Build Plugin Maven Mojo 1.10 based on RC1

Le mar. 26 févr. 2019 à 15:53, sebb a écrit : > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 14:49, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > With the -1, I cancel this RC. And, with Gary’s comment, I’ll release the > > release plugin first then build, then patent. > > What does 'patent' mean here? CP maybe. ;-) >> [...]

Re: [Rng] Jira permissions

Hi Alex. Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 12:01, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Hi, > > I do not have edit permissions for Jira RNG. I can close my tickets but > not edit those I did not create. > > My profile has me in the group jira-users. > > This may be an account link issue as my apache login is

Re: [VOTE] Redirect github notifications to issues@

Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 22:35, Marcelo Vanzin a écrit : > > I'm opening a vote based on recent discussions about the extra noise > generated by github updates going to dev@. So please vote: > > - +1 to redirect github updates of all commons repos to the issues@ list > - -1 to keep things as is

Re: [Rng] README.md and broken javadoc link

Hi. Le lun. 18 févr. 2019 à 16:22, Alex Herbert a écrit : > >>> [...] > > > > Command > > $ JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/ mvn > > -Pcommons-rng-examples -Pjdk8-javadoc clean package site site:stage > > works on > > $ /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -version > > openjdk

Re: [Rng] README.md and broken javadoc link

e Environment (build 9-Debian+0-9b181-4bpo91) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 9-Debian+0-9b181-4bpo91, mixed mode) I missed when the "jdk8-javadoc" profile became mandatory. Is there a way to have it activated automatically when necessary (e.g. when compiling with a JKD >= 8)? Gi

Re: [Rng] README.md and broken javadoc link

fer to "1.3-SNAPSHOT"). Le dim. 17 févr. 2019 à 16:08, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 16 Feb 2019, at 21:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > Le sam. 16 févr. 2019 à 13:12, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> >

Re: [Rng] README.md and broken javadoc link

Hello. Le sam. 16 févr. 2019 à 13:12, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > The link to the javadoc on the GitHub homepage is broken. I cannot find a > link to the javadoc from the official commons RNG homepage. > > I have tried to update the README.md using the commons build plugin. Here is > a

Re: [All, Math, Statistics] MathJax support

Le ven. 15 févr. 2019 à 12:15, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 15/02/2019 02:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le jeu. 14 févr. 2019 à 16:54, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> Commons RNG uses MathJax as a script to add support for rendering > >> equations

Re: [All, Math, Statistics] MathJax support

Le jeu. 14 févr. 2019 à 16:54, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > Commons RNG uses MathJax as a script to add support for rendering > equations in the Javadocs. > > This support was originally included using the tag of > the maven-javadoc-plugin. This was valid for 2.x (see [1]). > > Version 3.x (used

Re: [commons-rng] 02/02: The commons-math distributions can use a null random generator

Hi. Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 21:21, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 13 Feb 2019, at 17:52, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > >> Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 18:47, Alex Herbert a > >> écrit : > >> > >>> On 13/02/2019 17:35, Gilles Sadowski

Re: [STATISTICS] Possible imprecision or bias of BinomialDistribution.inverseCumulativeProbability() or NormalDistribution.inverseCumulativeProbability()

Hi. Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 13:12, Roman Leventov a écrit : > > I try to approximate inverse CDF of BinomialDistribution with inverse CDF > of NormalDistribution. Works pretty well, but there is a noticeable bias, > that may be a sign of some imprecision or bias in either >

Re: [RNG] Allow exceptions from random generator constructors

Hello. Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 15:23, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I am adding a new family of random generators in commons-rng. The > algorithms do not work when the seed state is all zeros [1]. What would > be best solution for an API. Here are some options: > > 1. Throw an exception. -1 The

Re: [commons-rng] 02/02: The commons-math distributions can use a null random generator

Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 18:47, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On 13/02/2019 17:35, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 17:20, a écrit : > >> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > >> >

Re: [commons-rng] 02/02: The commons-math distributions can use a null random generator

Hello. Le mer. 13 févr. 2019 à 17:20, a écrit : > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aherbert pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-rng.git > > commit 367f022a88dedf2b79778f18ad1ed3ec655fffe8 > Author:

Re: Reply-To settings (was: [vote] fix the misconfiguration of the dev@ mailing list)

n, 11 Feb 2019 at 07:08, sebb wrote: > > > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 12:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski > > > >

Re: [RNG, ALL] Checkstyle version

Hi. Le mar. 12 févr. 2019 à 11:22, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > If checkstyle 7+ requires Java 8 then this is a blocker for common-rng. > That still supports Java 1.6. This is the target (so that it can *run* on older JRE). But the build/validation tools can well have different requirements. > I

Re: Reply-To settings (was: [vote] fix the misconfiguration of the dev@ mailing list)

Hi. Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 16:08, sebb a écrit : > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 12:33, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [RNG, ALL] Checkstyle version

Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 12:19, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > I would like to upgrade the checkstyle version in commons-rng. Currently > the project uses maven-checkstyle-plugin 3.0.0 which defaults to > checkstyle 6.18. > > This version is old [1] and not supported by modern IDEs. An update (to >

Re: [vote] fix the misconfiguration of the dev@ mailing list

Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 11:16, sebb a écrit : > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 09:24, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb a écrit : > > > > > > I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-T

Re: [vote] fix the misconfiguration of the dev@ mailing list

Hi. Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 10:02, sebb a écrit : > > I checked a few other ASF lists and they all have Reply-To set either > to the current list or to dev@ for lists such as commits@ and > notifications@ I had a look at that too. But IMO * "dev" and * "commits", "notifications", ... are

Re: [vote] fix the misconfiguration of the dev@ mailing list

Hello. Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 09:47, Mark Thomas a écrit : > > -1 > > Changing the reply-to configuration increases the chances of message > threads being moved off-list by accident. I am concerned about the risk > of harm to the community that that represents. > > I vote to leave the current

Re: [ALL] Broken builds

Hi. Le sam. 9 févr. 2019 à 17:10, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > > Hi, > > several component have are broken builds on the master branch. Should be > change our policy for pushing to master to a pull request based model, > where each change has to pass the CI pipeline first? I think this would be >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.12 based on RC2

Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 12:36, sebb a écrit : > > -1 to the release: The Javadoc does not mention that "SecureRandom" is used by default. And... where is the branch? Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.12 based on RC2

s in other repository, > and will be pushed/merged during the next steps of the release. Which repository? Regards, Gilles > > Cheers > Bruno > > > > > On Friday, 8 February 2019, 10:30:07 pm NZDT, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.12 based on RC2

y omitted too > much of it. Sorry. > CheersBruno > > On Friday, 8 February 2019, 9:58:47 pm NZDT, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: > > Hello Bruno. > > Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 02:54, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > Had a bit of spare time to inves

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.12 based on RC2

Hello Bruno. Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 02:54, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit : > > Hi, > > Had a bit of spare time to investigate this one (almost end of Friday for me > anyway, hooray!). > > There are two unit tests in Sha512 hanging for me in Eclipse, > testSha512CryptExplicitCall and

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >