Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

pt., 3 gru 2021 o 12:30 sebb napisał(a): > Only TLPs can be moved to the Attic. > > Commons components can be moved to dormant if they are no longer being > developed. Thanks sebb, didn't know that :) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

And just to clarify one thing: by drop I mean moving the project into the attic, I still would like to extract some stuff (like benchmarks) into the code hosted at Github. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ pt., 26 lis 2021 o 10:28 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > &g

Re: Struts 2.5.28

pt., 26 lis 2021 o 12:03 sebb napisał(a): > Wrong mailing list? Right, sorry for that and thanks for pointing this out :) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Struts 2.5.28

Hi, A small problem was discovered in 2.5.27 and I would like to quickly release 2.5.28 with the fix [1], then wait a few weeks and release another 2.5.x with Yasser's changes and close the 2.5.x line (if no more problems will be reported after the last version). [1]

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

czw., 25 lis 2021 o 15:57 Mark Thomas napisał(a): > Am I reading the archives correctly when I conclude there has never been > an ASF release of Commons OGNL of any version? (snapshots don't count) Yes, no stable release of Commons OGNL. > Why will migrating changes from 3.x be any easier if

Re: [OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

czw., 25 lis 2021 o 15:42 Jason Pyeron napisał(a): > > I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This > > was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no > > activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the > > Does not imply it is not used,

[OGNL] Drop commons-ognl project

Hi, I wonder what do you think about dropping commons-ognl project? This was supposed to be the next major version (4.x) but there was no activity in the project for a long time. Also migrating all the changes from the previous Github version is rather an impossible task. At the same time I want

Re: Preparing a release

niedz., 27 gru 2020 o 21:14 Bernd Eckenfels napisał(a): > I would say if the maven release plugin and the maven pgp plug-ins work (on > your system and for the Pom) and the project builds on al l supported > platforms, go for it. If you have your ASF login and thenPgpg key in the Keys > file

Re: Preparing a release

Sorry, I was not subscribed to the list. On 2020/12/25 01:18:00, Gary Gregory wrote: > There might be a lot more to consider here since this would be a major > release. Are there breaking API changes we want to make? Are there > deprecated APIs we want to drop? > > I see a lot of errors fly by

Preparing a release

Hi, I would like to (finally) prepare a first release of the Apache Commons OGNL project. I'm reading the docs [1][2], which I think is enough to prepare the release. Is it possible to release a version just to learn how to do the release? I mean, there is still a lot of code that I would like

Re: [Collections] UnmodifiableSet/UnmodifiableList

2017-03-23 16:55 GMT+01:00 Javen O'Neal : > The best solution is to document where you return an UnmodifiableSet versus > a regular Set in your Javadocs. Disagree, compare these two examples: /** * An immutable set, do not try to modify it */ private Set excluded; vs

Re: [Collections] UnmodifiableSet/UnmodifiableList

2017-03-23 16:35 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > On 23 March 2017 at 15:02, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> wrote: >> 2017-03-23 14:37 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >>> Not sure I follow. >>> >>> What exactly can the compi

Re: [Collections] UnmodifiableSet/UnmodifiableList

2017-03-23 14:37 GMT+01:00 sebb : > Not sure I follow. > > What exactly can the compiler check? You can declare a variable or a field of type UnmodifiableSet but there is no way to create instance of the type UnmodifiableSet - there is no such constructor neither factory method

[Collections] UnmodifiableSet/UnmodifiableList

Hi, I see that the Collections4 provides those classes. Anyway I wonder why I the constructor is private and why the factory method unmodifiableSet() returns Set? I would love to use those classes directly, to be straightforward that I expect the UnmodifiableSet and not just a Set. What about

Re: Enable travis-ci for commons-io?

2016-11-08 8:33 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher : > Hello everybody, > > what about enabling travis-ci for commons-io, so that pull requests are > tested automatically? You can also setup Jenkins to build PRs

Re: [OGNL] big patches or lots of little patches?

and to collect the lint patches up and apply them when done. What does the group think? -Jason -Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart (JIRA) Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 1:50 Subject: [jira] [Commented] (OGNL-241) remove unneeded reflection in OgnlException [ https

Re: [OGNL] A new release

Did some cleanup in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958 2013/12/30 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache svn. I am still looking

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org: The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the package ognl; declarations, where as the apache releases will use package org.apache.commons.ognl; I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package space which call the

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache svn. I am still looking for patches in git not yet applied to subversion, do you know of any? All should be already applied or don't affect Apache's version Regards --

Re: [OGNL] A new release

/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Javin Paul savingfu...@gmail.com wrote: Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen

Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?

Jason submitted his patch [1], what should we do? apply or leave it? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-239 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/11/14 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: On 14 Nov 2013, at 10:01, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le

Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?

Ok, so let's leave logging layer for now and we should focus on preparing the first release 2013/11/9 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: Neither does log4j 2 ;) Original message From: henrib hen...@apache.org Date:11/09/2013 12:23 (GMT-05:00) To: dev@commons.apache.org

Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?

2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00 Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-) Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to it... Is Log4j2 the one that is desired? I figured SLF4J was going to be the

Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?

jpye...@pdinc.us: -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:28 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging? 2013/9/4 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org 2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme

Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?

2013/11/5 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: On 5 Nov 2013, at 14:29, Lukasz Lenart wrote: So what's the idea here? Should we apply additional logging layer (as Jason proposed)? Or throw it away and start thinking about new release? I have reviewed TODOs and I haven't spotted any

Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?

2013/9/3 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: I found 11 uses of e.printStackTrace and think its pretty bad. Including OgnlException overwrites printStackTrace and writes to System.err for some reason. In addition there are a lot of System.out's, but those are all commented and seem to

Re: [OGNL] A new release

I have removed @Deprecated methods, tomorrow will review all the TODOs. After that we can start planning the release. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-232 2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better... Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/3/26

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: +1, go for it. Now its time to see if our testcases are good. They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-) I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts. Not so easy, OGNL 4 is a different beast, but I'll try ;-)

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right place, or at least the only place, where this

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: Do you mean this [1] isEvalChain method? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/SimpleNode.java IDEA cheats me ;-) It used wrong version ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122

Re: [OGNL] A new release

Hi, I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe These nested if statements could be combined should be resolved, but the rest I don't see a point instead of just satisfying PMD itself. Some of the Findbugs

Re: svn commit: r1451672 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2013/3/2 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/3/2 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: - commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectorysite-content/commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectory + commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectory${project.build.directory}/site-content

Re: svn commit: r1451672 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/pom.xml

2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: - commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectorysite-content/commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectory + commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectory${project.build.directory}/site-content/commons.scmPubCheckoutDirectory so if you use mvn clean. You will checkout again the content

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I need? and then what to do? I found this [1], but I have one question, how to check locally how the site will look like before deploying it? I have the only solution: mvn clean

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in target/site/) to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I can. I just moved site-content into target/ folder and

Re: [OGNL] A new release

How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I need? and then what to do? eg. RAT report is broken as it includes all the html files [2] [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-ognl/ [2]

Re: [OGNL] A new release

Why the Download section is commented out in the site.xml ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-231 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: CMS/SvnPubSub for site live ?

ech.. I don't want to complain, but I had (have) the same problem with Struts project which is basically related to pushing changes directly into production branch, which means you cannot test the changes on the staging before pushing to production :\ Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122

Re: CMS/SvnPubSub for site live ?

2013/2/2 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: That's because maven relativize urls while building the site. Check a maven site build log you will see something like: Relativizing decoration links with respect to project URL: http://commons.apache.org/ognl/ So as the link for commons home is

Re: CMS/SvnPubSub for site live ?

2013/1/30 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi Folks, Ok to go live ? Something missing ? (maybe sandbox parent release ?) When I enter a subproject and then I want to go back to the main page via Home link on the right (under Commons section), it directs me to proper/ which simply returns

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/1/8 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub requirement for the site and 28 is not ready yet, waiting for INFRA. See vote thread for commons-email. Thanks Jörg! Looks like something changed as ognl build passed

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/1/8 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com: Hi Lukasz, Lukasz Lenart wrote: Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub

Re: [OGNL] A new release

Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013/1/8 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Not sure about the differences of these 2

Re: [OGNL] A new release

How to generate reports locally ? Thanks in advance -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012/3/9 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org: I don't think it is necessary when fixing this kind of issues, unless you need to heavily change the code, but I don't suspect so ;) let me know if I can be helpful in some way - more than just helping on fixing issues :P I have few doubts

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012/10/24 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: That's really weird, last time I have seen (and also corrected) a bunch of error like this, but they all were more than justified. I'll try to generate the report and see what happens. Maybe the website is out of sync ? How to deploy a new

Re: I have the opensymphony JIRA export

2011/6/20 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: Please let me know how it should be handled. Both the JIRA xml export and the attachments. (this message is going to 2 lists struts and commons, you do not have to reply to both) Here [1] you have XWork related issue, you can create another one for

Re: [OGNL] Release a new version

You're right, it looks like releasing 3.0.2 from GitHub is the best option. I'll try to prepare a release ASAP and then talk to Sonatype guys ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/

[OGNL] Release a new version

Hi all, Can we make a new release ? OGNL is under incubation still but that shouldn't be a problem. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To

Re: [OGNL] Release a new version

the Jochen message, but he's working in order to have OGNL-8 fixed, I'd wait for it before releasing it. WDYT? Have a nice weekend, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com

Re: [OGNL] Release a new version

2011/6/11 Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ? Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over. Thanks Jochen! I'm

Re: [OGNL] drop old opensymphony build

+1 for dropping the old way of build REgards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For

Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions

+1 for JIRA space and issues@commons.a.o Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl - To

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011/3/3 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com: 2011/3/3 Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com: Moving OGNL to Struts 2 could have one pitfall - it can be driven by the project's needs. But that can be good as well ;-) Just a note FWIW. Spring WebFlow also uses OGNL. So, OGNL

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011/3/3 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org: Anyone more? :) You can count on me, but I'm a Struts Committer. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Confitura 2011 http://confitura.pl - To

Fwd: OGNL as a part of Commons

...@struts.apache.org, lukasz.len...@gmail.com Lukasz, you can count on me too, feel free to tell me how I can help you (I've already subscribed on every apache commons mailing list and incubator one too) On 3 March 2011 12:04, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, As Antonio

Fwd: OGNL as a part of Commons

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Dave Newton davelnew...@gmail.com Date: 2011/3/3 Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons To: Struts Developers List d...@struts.apache.org, lukasz.len...@gmail.com DW: Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com It seems like it might be a good

Fwd: OGNL as a part of Commons

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org Date: 2011/3/3 Subject: Re: OGNL as a part of Commons To: Struts Developers List d...@struts.apache.org Count me in for backup. If someone gets tied up with day work and you need an extra hand, I will help take

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

Hi, So, where I should start ? Kind regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Kapituła Javarsovia http://javarsovia.pl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011/3/1 Antonio Petrelli antonio.petre...@gmail.com: There is another problem: is OpenSymphony willing to donate the code to Apache? It's not only a problem of forking, because the entire copyright will pass to Apache, at least for the donated code as it is (the copyright will remain to

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2011/3/1 Stephen Colebourne scolebou...@joda.org: Based on what I know of OGNL, it is/was reasonably well used. Trying to merge it into another project doesn't help those existing users. Yep, that's true The question is what are the author(s) of OGNL looking for? A home for maintainance? The

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2010/12/15 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com: What happened to OpenSymphony that you cannot use their infrastructure anymore? I don't know, there was some rumor about domain owners or so. Also other projects were moved out from OpenSymphony: WebWork became Struts 2, XWork was moved to

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2010/12/14 sebb seb...@gmail.com: So does it offer anything that JEXL does not? I think no, it looks like JEXL2 is even much better than OGNL. I don't know JEXL2 so deep, but with OGNL you can create objects directly (o = new Object()) and you can call methods with parameters (foo.doit(o)).

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2010/12/13 Gary Gregory ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com: I am wondering how OGNL relates to Commons JXPath http://commons.apache.org/jxpath/ When would you use one vs. the other? OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features like calling statics or using constructors. It's

Re: OGNL as a part of Commons

2010/12/13 sebb seb...@gmail.com: OGNL is an Expression Language like UEL, it has some nice features like calling statics or using constructors. It's used internally by Struts 2 to evaluate user expressions and not only in JSP but in any other place. In which case it seems to be similar to

OGNL as a part of Commons

Hi all, I want to ask you all, is it possible to include OGNL (https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl , http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/ ) into Commons project? As I know OGNL is used by few ASF projects (Struts 2, Tapestry) and right now it's homeless project. It's very hard to prepare a new