Re: [RDF] Bump Java requirement from Java 8 to 11

Let's move the ecosystem forward :-) Cheers, Martijn On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 05:07, Gary Gregory wrote: > To use a new Jena version, we would require Java 11. > > Raise your hand if this would be a deal breaker for you and why. > > Raise your hand to say hi or anything else ;-) > > See: > > -

Re: [all] Amazon Corretto

We're (AdoptOpenJDK) are working with Amazon if that helps :-). They're using a bunch of our build and test scripts. Cheers, Martijn On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 19:03, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Isn't this basically the same as Adopt Open JDK: > > https://adoptopenjdk.net > > or am I missing

Re: [All] "Commons Math" is not a component

org> wrote: > Hi all. > > Stephen Colebourne correctly summarized the situation[1]: > Project management must be based on life-cycle, not the > other way around. > > Here below, a concrete plan is proposed in answer to the > suggestion (of a fork) made by Martijn Ve

Re: [All][Math][Numbers] Refactoring "Commons Math" (Was: [...] "Commons Geometry"?)

c 2017 23:45:43 +, Martijn Verburg wrote: > >> Can this project be forked to a new domain over on GitHub (under the >> existing Apache license), >> > > It is allowed, of course. However, I think that it is the > last option to consider, because it will furthe

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

Can this project be forked to a new domain over on GitHub (under the existing Apache license), split up and then continued in that case? Cheers, Martijn On 3 December 2017 at 11:51, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 11:18:18 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >> On

Re: [All][Math] New component: "Commons Geometry"?

Has the PMC and the active developers met over a video call to try and hash this out? It would be a shame to see this library fall into disuse. I'd also argue with Jigsaw being the heart of Java 9+ that more modular libs now make sense. Cheers, Martijn On 1 December 2017 at 14:56, Gilles

Re: [ALL][Math] Anyone?

Purely as an end user yes I'd like to see another release :-) Cheers, Martijn On 19 March 2017 at 18:27, Gilles wrote: > Hello. > > > Issues are piling up on JIRA. > I'm the only one interacting with external contributors. > > Is there interest in having 4.0

Status of BCEL 6.0 release

Hi all, I had a look through the archives and noticed a conversation around early Nov discussing getting some fixes contributed to the BCEL lib and doing a release to support Java 8. Is there anything I can do to help? Cheers, Martijn