Does anyone mind if I start a 2.0 exploratory branch where we
can look
into splitting JCL up into multiple modules?
Actually I have also been thinking of starting a JCL 2.0
It would be a chance to fix the bad reputation.
I think you're biting off a really big task here.
SLF4J has
On 21.02.2008, at 12:01, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 21.02.2008, at 11:23, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Anyone know if it's possible to configure Maven 2 to capture the
test output in the test reports instead of displaying everything on
the console ? That's how Maven 1 proceeded
You mean something like this?
EmailTransmission trans = new EmailTransmission();
trans.setHostName(smtp.myserver.org);
HtmlEmail email1 = new HtmlEmail();
...
HtmlEmail email2 = new HtmlEmail();
...
trans.addEmail(email1);
trans.addEmail(email2);
..
trans.send();
Sounds useful to
+1
On 19.02.2008, at 18:07, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
Artifacts available for review are here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build-plugin/
tags/commons-build-plugin-1.0-RC1/
On 20.02.2008, at 12:50, James Carman wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble with the GPG Plugin in Commons Parent?
I even tried overriding the version in Proxy's pom (to 1.0-alpha-4),
but I still get an error. I get a NullPointerException. Anyone else?
I can sign the artifacts by hand using
Yepp! I'll be around!
On 20.02.2008, at 20:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008?
I'm going to be there - perhaps we could have an informal get
together
if there are a few of us?
Sure! I'll be there from sunday evening to friday
On 20.02.2008, at 20:17, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 12:39 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What should we do with old sandbox sites after the project has been
promoted to the proper? Commons Proxy and Commons VFS still have
their old sites out there. Should we remove
+1 for the redirect
+1 for adding that to the promotion instructions
cheers
--
Torsten
On 19.02.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:
Should we open up a JIRA for this? Should we maybe add this to the
directions for promoting to proper?
On 2/19/08, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
I still don't see the need to overhaul the entire API.
And I don't see the point why we shouldn't. Going from from java 1.4
- 1.5 usually means a bit overhaul.
Perhaps usually, but for Commons IO?
The question was - why not? We are running around in circles here.
I see only a few isolated
Additionally, nobody stops us from shipping an io compat library
which translates the
calls original io 1.x calls for io2. That one can be used as real
replacement of old 1.x
series, but offers the possibility to use as much Java 5 specifics
as possible in the
new API (varargs, new
Because it is absolutely essential that we allow compatibility
with the older release.
Specifically, it is a requirement that if there are any binary or
source incompatible changes, then an application must be able to
run with both the old and new jar files (v1.4 and v2.0). The only
+1
On 06.02.2008, at 13:14, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I'd like to promote the commons-build-plugin from the Sandbox to
proper - so that it can be released and used in the commons-parent
pom. Site is available here:
http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-build-plugin/
Also see the following
On 05.02.2008, at 02:34, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The ant plugin I've been playing with in the Sandbox provides a way to
generate custom JIRA issue tracking pages and download pages for
components:
http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-build-plugin/
If we add it to the commons-parent, then
Looks cool IMO +1
cheers
--
Torsten
On 05.02.2008, at 22:14, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 8:40 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 9:51 AM, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.02.2008, at 02:34, Niall Pemberton wrote:
The ant plugin I've been
It's probably not a bad idea to remove them until there is something
in place again.
My 2 cents
--
Torsten
On 26.01.2008, at 07:07, Roland Weber wrote:
Hello Commons Developers,
I just noticed that the download link for Nightly Snapshots [1]
in your site navigation points to somewhat
On 21.01.2008, at 10:08, Tom Schindl wrote:
Hi Torsten,
I understand this but we are seeing many J2EE-Servers adopting OSGi
and many applications
(I admit most of them in Eclipse-world) also. It seems strange to
me in those envs to use this artificial
package to overcome jar-hell (which
What I ended up doing these days...
I have the most basic logging interface in the package space of my
libraries
interface Console {
void println(String)
}
And if the application using that library wants to log what's going
on *inside* the library I inject a Console implementation
On 03.01.2008, at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Selon Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Exec would need to migrate to proper first.
According to the website moving to proper requires an active group
of committers - I hardly qualifiy for that so I'm sort of stuck
That was my concern
On 02.01.2008, at 19:57, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
Hi folks,
I fixed a few things on commons-exec but I'm not sure how to proceed
from here since I'm the last/only man standing.
1) I nearly finished the open issue and need to do some field
testing -
and I would need some help on more
In general I think it's a good idea. Happy to help and apply patches.
cheers
--
Torsten
It would be great if some of the projects here could add these
meta data
as part of their next release. This will make the life of all
projects
using OSGi much much easier.
So if you're interested in
So I will probably follow this road. This is a good opportunity for a
refactoring and polishing of some interfaces and base
classes. Because
we will have major changes, changing the package name (maybe to
o.a.c.configuration2?) will certainly make sense.
I'd go for o.a.c.configuration2 here.
Apache Commons Board Report, December 2007
General
===
o The process of electing PMC members and committers has been
fixated in writing
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/pmc/commons/templates/new-
pmc-workflow.txt
This brought up the question what should happen first:
On 13.12.2007, at 09:42, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Oliver Heger wrote:
(There was a similar discussion about commons lang recently.)
Configuration used to support JDK 1.3. For the next release (either
1.6 or 2.0) I would like to drop this compatibility. The number
of feature
requests that require
We also need to pass on the gpg passphrase
mvn release:perform -Prc -Dgpg.passphrase=PASSPHRASE -Darguments=-
Prc -Dgpg.passphrase=PASSPHRASE
IMO this is a maven bug/misconception that one cannot just pass on
those parameters automatically. This whole 'arguments' business looks
like a
On 13.12.2007, at 13:00, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 11:39 AM, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also need to pass on the gpg passphrase
mvn release:perform -Prc -Dgpg.passphrase=PASSPHRASE -Darguments=-
Prc -Dgpg.passphrase=PASSPHRASE
Are you sure? When did
On 13.12.2007, at 14:38, Michiel Kalkman wrote:
+1/-1
I am all for using jdk 1.5, but I guess it will take some time before
I can use this jdk at work. Is it possible and easy to generate an 1.4
compatible binary version from 1.5 sources ? If so, I'd say go for it.
This comes up all the
Summary
===
Nothing that really requires the board's attention. A quick
overview of the past month:
o Question has come up whether commons codec is thread safe
- request for better documentation
o More activity on commons jexl
- roadmap towards 2.0
o Discussion about
On 07.11.2007, at 04:54, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Oct 21, 2007 7:12 AM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Maybe it would make more sense to do these changes in commons-
jci-fam
first and then move that to a new commons-fam?
Sounds reasonable, although I still think IO is a
On 21.10.2007, at 12:37, Oliver Heger wrote:
(this may be a stupid question, but I did not follow the setup of
Continuum too closely)
Not stupid at all. I would imagine the artifacts go into the local
maven repo of vmbuild.apache.org Would be nice to expose that
properly ...or run the
Hey Niall,
Thanks for looking into that. But frankly speaking I am not a big fan
of that for a couple of reasons.
That would make it the 3rd FAM implementation in the commons
codebase. There already is commons-jci-fam, the commons-vfs fam and
then we would also have the commons-io fam.
Apache Commons Board Report, October 2007
Summary
===
o We got a fair amount of not the usual suspects bringing up
issues and suggestion.
o Proxy moved from sandbox to proper. No release yet.
o TSU encryption notification has been sent for Apache Commons OpenPGP
o We got a code
On 19.09.2007, at 20:56, Henri Yandell wrote:
It would still be code that's not covered by a CLA, so different from
most of the code at the ASF.
True. /me wonders why we didn't realize that problem during the
discussion :)
I'm not sure how frowned on that would be - probably quite a
be no problem though.
cheers
--
Torsten
On 19.09.2007, at 19:43, Henri Yandell wrote:
Hey Torsten,
Feedback from the board report; what did you mean by sponsoring
below?
New Incubator project?
Hen
On 9/13/07, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache Commons Board Report, September 2007
Ramiro,
Thanks for that! Would you mind creating a jira issue for it? That
would help to keep track.
cheers
--
Torsten
On 13.09.2007, at 06:00, Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes wrote:
People,
I was once writing some code in order to study the Javamail API
while trying to address some
Apache Commons Board Report, September 2007
Summary
===
Not that much happened this month.
o A couple of new people on the scene that expressed their
willingness to contribute
o Discussions of sponsoring compress with code from TrueZip
- https://truezip.dev.java.net/
- one
On 25.08.2007, at 17:26, Filip Defoort wrote:
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
It is an interesting topic (to underline this: I am sitting here
on vacation for a hadful of days using my mobile to write this
mail ;-) ), though, due to some other OS projects I am really
getting out of time.
On 25.08.2007, at 15:21, Chr. Grobmeier wrote:
In fact, i compared the TrueZip implementation to Compress
yesterday.
We have quite less features and on some points in the code we depend
on java.util.zip packages.
Why is using java.uil.zip bad?
In some discussion in here people said that
...but it would be still a bit of work. When I was
trying to add a new archiver implementation I was frustrated with
some of the details of the current API
I remember. Can you be more concrete? Maybe i can add some
improvements here.
Uff ...would love to help but this has already been a
svn switch
...or what are you after?
On 15.08.2007, at 08:48, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
any suggestions or helper tools for relocating from jakarta/commons
to commons available?
Thanks,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe,
test
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was off for vacation and was (unexpectedly) completely offline for
the whole time ...so we got to get this sent to the board quickly -
sorry.
Please add your comments - I'll write it up nicely once we have all
input gathered.
--
Apache Commons Board Report, August 2007
Summary
===
Continuum is up and being monitored on there now. I've installed the
latest beta of Continuum, so we have JDK/Maven profiles, and project
grouping features (including project level security, notifications
and
build definitions). I would suggest all of commons should be in one
group since it
Done!
(sorry, was away)
On 02.08.2007, at 16:37, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Torsten,
Can you correct the permissions on
/www/www.apache.org//dist/commons/jci (currently only you can write)
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
301 - 343 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
