Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8.0 based on RC1

+1 if my vote still counts On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 4:29 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > Could I get more PMC reviews please? > > Gary > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 8:40 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > > Commons DbUtils 1.7 was released, so I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

Sorry, meant to say: +1 On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:34 PM Carl Hall wrote: > Thanks, Bill. Looking for 2 more positive votes to proceed. :) I'd like > to hear from Gary given his concerns on this thread. > > > > On Jan 22, 2020, at 6:00 AM, William Speirs wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

is ready to be the > successive version. Once we’re happy with that, create a 1.x brach from > master, bring 2.0 to master, and see if we can get a 2.0 release out before > 2 more years. :) > > > On Jan 11, 2020, at 10:29 AM, William Speirs wrote: > > > > What is there to "clean up&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

> > > > > > Also, I _think_ I had to create 2_0 as the branch name, because svn (at > > the > > > time) wouldn't let me use a dot... but I _might_ be mis-remembering. > > > > > > Bill- > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

For what it's worth, I'm unable to find that branch in git: $ git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-dbutils.git --branch commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 Cloning into 'commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2'... fatal: Remote branch commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 not found in upstream

Re: [dbutils] 2_0 branch discussion

Gary, I appreciate the sentiment of not wanting to make a major change, but if you look at the commit history and the emails from 2013 you'll realize this last commit is actually fairly small. The only reason this wasn't done in 2013 was that the release process didn't seem to want to work for me,

Re: [dbutils] 2_0 branch discussion

I just merged the code from my fork ( https://github.com/wspeirs/sop4j-dbutils/) into the commons-dbutils 2_0 branch ( https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=180c0990b1f0da4d0039904b68cc6b57f00558e5 ). The code builds, and all the tests pass... that's as far as I

Re: Proposal to Release

That 2.0 release attempt was mine... Feel free to blow it away, and proceed with your release as 2.0. However, most of my changes in there should be working. The changes add named parameter support, and a fluent API to the library. The only reason it wasn't released was because I couldn't figure

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons DbUtils to git

+1!!! On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017, 4:33 AM Carl Hall wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I’d like to call a vote by lazy consensus for migrating the code base of > > Apache Commons DbUtils to git. > > > >

Re: [dbutils] Adding fluent api

commons-dbutils already has a fluent API: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/dbutils/branches/2_0/ Someone just needs to put the finishing touches on it, and/or use my fork of commons-dbutils: https://github.com/wspeirs/sop4j-dbutils Bill- On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Ole Ersoy

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Proxy 2.0 based on RC1

+1 non-binding vote... Bill- On Apr 7, 2014 1:50 PM, Matt Benson mben...@apache.org wrote: I would like to release Commons Proxy 2.0. Commons Proxy 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/proxy/ (svn revision 4960) Maven artifacts are

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 1.6 based on RC1

This vote has failed to pass and is now closed. Bill- On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:25 PM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I would like to release commons-dbutils 1.6 commons-dbutils 1.6 RC1 is available

Re: svn commit: r1489347 - /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/pom.xml

Is there documentation about this somewhere? What should I have done? Thanks... Bill- On Jun 4, 2013 5:02 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Tue Jun 4 09:02:02 2013 New Revision: 1489347 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489347 Log: Only tags should use non-SNAPSHOT versions

Re: svn commit: r1489347 - /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/pom.xml

2013 11:56, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: Is there documentation about this somewhere? What should I have done? Thanks... Bill- On Jun 4, 2013 5:02 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: Author: sebb Date: Tue Jun 4 09:02:02 2013 New Revision: 1489347 URL: http

Re: svn commit: r1489347 - /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/pom.xml

, 2013/6/4 William Speirs wspe...@apache.org My confusion, it says in those directions to remove the -SNAPSHOT from the version. That's exactly what I did. So then I shouldn't submit that to trunk? I thought you were supposed to get everything setup in trunk then simply svn copy

[VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 1.6 based on RC1

I would like to release commons-dbutils 1.6 commons-dbutils 1.6 RC1 is available for review here: http://people.apache.org/~wspeirs/commons-dbutils-1.6-RC1/ (svn revision r1489259) Details of changes since 1.5 are in the release notes:

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

You mean QueryExecutor, right? Now it's in line with UpdateExecutor and InsertExecutor, but I feel a bit uncomfortable with theses classes as they mostly expose protected methods and don't look like they are meant to be extended. Yes, I did mean QueryExecutor... sorry. I make my methods

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

OK, so then for the 2.0 release I'd just remove the 1.6 lines? Bill- On May 10, 2013 5:37 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: The date can be the date you cut the RC. Gary On May 10, 2013, at 16:23, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: Consider this a pre release candidate

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

it should all work. Bill- On May 11, 2013 8:09 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: OK, so then for the 2.0 release I'd just remove the 1.6 lines? No. Based on changes.xml, It sounds like we were going

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

versions. Gary On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:13 AM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: It is and isn't up to date. There will be a 1.6 which will include big fixes. However 2.0 is a major rewrite. So I think the proper course of action is to remove the 1.6 lines from the changes file

[DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

Consider this a pre release candidate for DBUTILS-2.0. I fixed the following things from RC1: - Removed @author tags - Changed QueryRunner to be public - Made ArrayHandler generic (but it's ugly because I just cast to T[], does anyone have a better idea here?) If folks (*cough* Benedikt Ritter,

Re: [DBUTILS] [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 2.0 based on RC1

Yes... my apologies for not officially stating so in the e-mail list. This vote as failed. Bill- On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com wrote: is this vote dead? On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: OK... I don't need my

Re: [DBUTILS] [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 2.0 based on RC1

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:34 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Maven artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~wspeirs/commons-dbutils-2.0-RC1/maven Maven artifacts must be uploaded to Nexus. How do I do this? I was following the directions here:

[DBUTILS] Working on a DBUtils 2.0 Release Candidate

As the subject implies, I'm trying to get a release candidate ready for DBUtils 2.0. I haven't heard any feedback from the community on my changes, so I'm going to assume everyone loves them ;-) A few issues I'm running into: 1) Clirr is trying to compare my 2.0 release with version 1.5. How do

[CLI] OptionGroup Broken?

I'm trying to use OptionGroup to mutually exclude arguments, and it seems to be broken. I've setup --ip-address --hostname as options in a single group, then provide both on the command line and would expect the parser to throw an AlreadySelectedException, but it doesn't... it happily parses

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

If the entire API is to change, then I agree one might as well treat it as a completerly new library and change groupId/package name. Users could either stick with the current design or rewrite to use the new design. I guess the question is, are you in favor of changing a great deal of the

[DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

I just submitted DBUTILS-105https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-105 to add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped that up with DBUTILS-95 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-95 and DBUTILS-92 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-92 it

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

the coordinates if the package name changes to account for BC breakage. Gary On Dec 13, 2012, at 17:47, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I just submitted DBUTILS-105https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-105 to add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons-DbUtils 1.5 based on RC2

+1 Bill- On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote: Simo, Can you please list the changes between rc1 and rc2? Gary On Jul 17, 2012, at 8:09, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to

Re: [all] Java 5 vs. 6

+1 for targeting Java 6 on new releases... Bill- On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 10/02/2012 14:41, Ralph Goers wrote: In many cases the differences between Java 5 and 6 aren't noticeable. If the project doesn't require anything from Java 6, why

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

For what it's worth, I am +1 here as well (I was the one who implemented the changed the required Java 1.6). Thanks... Bill- On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again. As a volunteer I am here for making

Re: [DBUTILS] 1.5 RC1 Missing Site

://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:20 PM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I have cut RC1 of DBUTILS, but there the site does not appear to have been uploaded per

[DBUTILS] 1.5 RC1 Missing Site

I have cut RC1 of DBUTILS, but there the site does not appear to have been uploaded per the vote template I found here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC1/site/index.html Any help would be greatly appreciated... Bill-

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

03:32, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: Anyone have any idea on this? Should I be seeing basic auth for my challenge? Where can I set the password as I was never prompted to enter it. At this point, can someone else deploy RC1 while I figure out what is wrong on my end? I don't use

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

Anyone have any idea on this? Should I be seeing basic auth for my challenge? Where can I set the password as I was never prompted to enter it. At this point, can someone else deploy RC1 while I figure out what is wrong on my end? Thanks... Bill- On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM, William Speirs

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Did you do the whole master pass phrase/obfuscated stuff that the top of the Using Nexus wiki points to? I did not do this at first, but I have since tried. I setup my settings-security.xml file as show on the wiki

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

:23 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW: My set up is such that I always enter my password on the CLI when Maven asks for it. Gary On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 December 2011 13:53, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Dec

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 December 2011 15:19, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I will try adding the additional elements: gpg.secretKeyring/path/to/secring.gpg/gpg.secretKeyring !-- must be on the execution path -- gpg.executablegpg2/gpg.executable Sorry, should have clarified

[dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

I am attempting to release RC1 of commons-dbutils. I was working through the directions found here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases I got to step C.1 and ran the following command: mvn -Prc release:prepare That command however froze part of the way through. The output is at the end

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

on Windows, sorry I cannot recall the dets. But, I follow these steps for the releases I manage: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus Gary On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:19 PM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I am attempting to release RC1 of commons-dbutils. I was working

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

when I run gpg (from the command line) it pops up a dialog box which asks for my password. I think this is some sort of GPG agent. Could that be getting in the way? Again, any help would be greatly appreciated... Bill- On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I'm

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

... Bill- On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:57 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 December 2011 18:59, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but without an official -1

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

Looks like it worked! [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 25 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Mon Dec 12 01:33:42 UTC 2011 Bill- On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:44 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 December 2011

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but without an official -1. When I get a chance, I'm going to change the pom to require Java 1.6 and make a note in the changes.xml file as well. If that builds with

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

December 2011 18:11, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote: I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires importing java.sql.SQLXML

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires importing java.sql.SQLXML which was introduced in Java 1.6. Currently DBUTILS is set to only require Java 1.5. Thoughts? Bill- On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:09 PM,

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

I haven't forgotten about this... been tied up at work with a new employee. One potential issue though, I have not created an Apache PGP key yet, so I will not have a chance to get it signed by anyone. What is the protocol for getting one's key signed? Thanks... Bill- On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at