I have been using semver for Commons components I am involved. I think we
are pretty good in general about it... YMMV ;-)
Gary
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:59 AM Claude Warren wrote:
> I think there is a belief in the general using public that Apache follows
> SemVer for most Java code. I think
I think there is a belief in the general using public that Apache follows
SemVer for most Java code. I think that it would be best if each module
specified if it follows SemVer or not -- just to clear up any confusion on
the part of the user.
Claude
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 4:08 PM Stefan
On 2019-10-18, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> My point/question was whether we do not already follow it.
We don't, at least not in all components.
Quite a few of our components don't have a patch number at all and they
sometimes create minor releases that would be patch releases if we
followed
Hi.
Le ven. 18 oct. 2019 à 14:31, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>
> On 2019-10-18, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > In another thread, the question was asked whether "Commons"
> > follows "SemVer".[1]
> > It seems to me that we (informally) abide by the intended goal.
> > Why not state it explicitly (and
On 2019-10-18, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> In another thread, the question was asked whether "Commons"
> follows "SemVer".[1]
> It seems to me that we (informally) abide by the intended goal.
> Why not state it explicitly (and make it a formal requirement for
> a release)?
To me it seems we have
+1 ensures interoperability for our users for minimal pain on our side.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:01 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/10/2019 à 12:46, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> > Why not state it explicitly (and make it a formal requirement for
> > a release)?
>
> -1, it restricts our
Le 18/10/2019 à 12:46, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Why not state it explicitly (and make it a formal requirement for
> a release)?
-1, it restricts our freedom for no real gain, we have enough
constraints already.
Emmanuel Bourg
Hello.
In another thread, the question was asked whether "Commons"
follows "SemVer".[1]
It seems to me that we (informally) abide by the intended goal.
Why not state it explicitly (and make it a formal requirement for
a release)?
Regards,
Gilles
[1] https://semver.org/
