gt; > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 23:23
> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Brining clirr to the ASF?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:19 P
>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Brining clirr to the ASF?
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we
> build
> > a go
For any Gradle users, Cédric put together a little Gradle plugin based
around the japicmp library which we use in Groovy, see here:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/blob/master/gradle/binarycompatibility.gradle
Cheers, Paul.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 9:56 PM, James Carman
+1 to Jochen's idea and I'd love to contribute to that effort!
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:40 AM Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> >> as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained.
As Clirr is internally based on BCEL, I'd rather see us build a new
tool on top of ASM, which is very well maintained. Besides, that would
solve the license problem.
Sounds like a existing idea. I'm interested in to contribute.
-- barthel
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Di., 14. Juni 2016
>> As Clirr is internally based on BCEL, I'd rather see us build a new
>> tool on top of ASM, which is very well maintained. Besides, that would
Jochen Wiedmann schrieb am Di., 14. Juni 2016
um 08:40 Uhr:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> >> as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we
> build
> >> a good part of our release strategy
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we build
>> a good part of our release strategy upon clirr. So I wonder whether we
>> should foster bringing clirr to the ASF (for example by going
Gary Gregory schrieb am Di., 14. Juni 2016 um
08:23 Uhr:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we
> build
> > a good part of our release
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we build
> a good part of our release strategy upon clirr. So I wonder whether we
> should foster bringing clirr to the ASF (for example by
Hi,
as Jochen has pointed out, Clirr seems to be unmaintained. However we build
a good part of our release strategy upon clirr. So I wonder whether we
should foster bringing clirr to the ASF (for example by going through
incubation). We're probably not the only ASF project using Clirr.
Benedikt
11 matches
Mail list logo