A nice-to-have would be to port from JUnit 4 to 5.
Gary
On 2024/02/20 02:08:03 "Gary D. Gregory" wrote:
> I bumped the Java version, the GitHub CI says Java 11 and 17 are OK but 21
> and 22-ea are not.
>
> See https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/actions/runs/7967484426
>
> I think we need
PRs will have to be rebased obviously.
Gary
On 2024/02/20 02:08:03 "Gary D. Gregory" wrote:
> I bumped the Java version, the GitHub CI says Java 11 and 17 are OK but 21
> and 22-ea are not.
>
> See https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/actions/runs/7967484426
>
> I think we need to address
I bumped the Java version, the GitHub CI says Java 11 and 17 are OK but 21 and
22-ea are not.
See https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/actions/runs/7967484426
I think we need to address Java 21 before anything else.
Help wanted ;-)
Gary
On 2024/02/19 07:29:49 Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> +1
>
+1
Since the project is created on top of libs like Jena, exactly to provide a
common interface go all these libs, I think the simplest is to always go
with the minimum thay works with every lib supported.
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024, 08:23 Martijn Verburg,
wrote:
> Let's move the ecosystem forward
Let's move the ecosystem forward :-)
Cheers,
Martijn
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 05:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> To use a new Jena version, we would require Java 11.
>
> Raise your hand if this would be a deal breaker for you and why.
>
> Raise your hand to say hi or anything else ;-)
>
> See:
>
> -
To use a new Jena version, we would require Java 11.
Raise your hand if this would be a deal breaker for you and why.
Raise your hand to say hi or anything else ;-)
See:
- the thread [RDF] New Jena Version
- the PR https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/196
Gary
