Re: [RDF] Commons release?

M, Bruno P. Kinoshita < > >>> brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Not so familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. > >>> > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging > issues

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

familiar, more familiar with Jena, but they are related. >>> > If nobody else volunteers, I can try to spend a weekend triaging issues >>> > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and >>> > volunteer to cut a new release. >>> &

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

issues >> > and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and >> > volunteer to cut a new release. >> > CheersBruno >> > >> > From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

since the last release and > > volunteer to cut a new release. > > CheersBruno > > > > From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM > > Subject: Re

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

and seeing if I can catch up with the changes since the last release and > volunteer to cut a new release. > CheersBruno > > From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

reg...@gmail.com> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 4:25 PM Subject: Re: [RDF] Commons release? Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... Gary On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn <acob...@amh

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

Hopefully someone who is familiar with Commons RDF is reading this... Gary On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It > seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

Hello, I wanted to check in on the status of a 0.4.0 release of Commons RDF. It seems that all of the open PRs have been merged. Any idea on a timeframe for the next release? Thanks, Aaron On 9/19/17, 5:58 PM, "Aaron Coburn" wrote: Sergio, Thanks! The LDP

Re: RDF Commons release?

Hi Gary, I already replied it: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a6ff6e7823f6982afe3e6b13a53567aeb91320e58b1aafbb7c1a3e3d@ Maybe trying to correctly label the subject I actually broke the thread. Sorry. On Oct 5, 2017 16:25, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > Would anyone

Re: RDF Commons release?

Would anyone closely associated with Commons RDF care to comment? Gary On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hi! > > The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some > nice features in the master branch that I would really like to

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

Sergio, Thanks! The LDP server implementation is spread across quite a few repositories in this github organization: https://github.com/trellis-ldp (everything is Apache2 licensed), but the core abstractions are found in: API: https://github.com/trellis-ldp/trellis-api SPI:

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

Hi Aaron, you're right, we have quite some things to release. But first I' d like to take a look to our backlog, because we have some open PRs. Hopefully I'll have some time later this week, at the latest on the weekend. Just for curiosity, can you provide us a pointer to your Commons RDF-based

Re: [RDF] Commons release?

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote: > Hi! > > The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some > nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- > especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a

RDF Commons release?

Hi! The last release of commons-rdf was from last November, and there are some nice features in the master branch that I would really like to use -- especially the improved OSGi support. It seems that there are a few unresolved jira issues, such that this wouldn't be a 1.0 release, but even a