Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-17 Thread sebb
On 17 June 2012 03:40, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to the have 1.5 target? Commons-io =2.3 is not pressing for VFS. Gary Why would it not be? If that is

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-16 Thread Ralph Goers
. /Andreas -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VFS-Update-VFS-trunk-to-Java-6-tp4629464p4635119.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-16 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jun 16, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: For now, I want @override so I am ok with 1.6 source but I is safe to the have 1.5 target? Commons-io =2.3 is not pressing for VFS. Gary Why would it not be? If that is all you are doing the @Override doesn't make it to the actual Class.

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-15 Thread garydgregory
installations left, and jboss 4 doesn't support jdk 6). I just wanted you to know that there still are VFS users that depend on jdk 1.5 compatibility. /Andreas -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VFS-Update-VFS-trunk-to-Java-6-tp4629464p4635119.html Sent

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-15 Thread James Ring
2.1 (we have several jboss 4 installations left, and jboss 4 doesn't support jdk 6). I just wanted you to know that there still are VFS users that depend on jdk 1.5 compatibility. /Andreas -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VFS-Update-VFS-trunk

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-15 Thread Gary Gregory
that depend on jdk 1.5 compatibility. /Andreas -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VFS-Update-VFS-trunk-to-Java-6-tp4629464p4635119.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-06-15 Thread Ralph Goers
installations left, and jboss 4 doesn't support jdk 6). I just wanted you to know that there still are VFS users that depend on jdk 1.5 compatibility. /Andreas -- View this message in context: http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/VFS-Update-VFS-trunk-to-Java-6-tp4629464p4635119.html Sent

RE: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-05-14 Thread Andreas Persson
FYI: I've updated VFS trunk to Java 6 to avoid getting stuck on older versions of jars and further moving VFS in the 21st century ;) Tasked as VFS-415. I was happy to see VFS-414 and VFS-313 being fixed, thank you very much for that! The change in VFS-415 however makes it impossible for us to

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-05-14 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks. We to we're taken by surprise by this as it was not discussed prior to the change. As a rule the minimum version should only be changed if something requires it. I'm waiting for a response from Gary as to why this was necessary before asking him to revert it. Ralph On May 14, 2012, at

Re: [VFS] Update VFS trunk to Java 6

2012-05-14 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote: Thanks. We to we're taken by surprise by this as it was not discussed prior to the change. A This has been backed out of SVN for now. (from the JIRA:) Whys: - Make VFS more attractive for new user/developers, new