On 7 March 2012 07:04, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
Given the release by
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
CSV is the name of the least surprise ...even if it supports e.g. TSV as well.
I would keep the name just for user to find it. Especially as the line
between CSV/TSV/TXT is quite blurry.
Since CSV is currently only a single
Le 07/03/2012 12:57, sebb a écrit :
Since CSV is currently only a single package with very few classes,
would it perhaps be suitable as a part of an existing Commons
component?
[csv] is still small but will probably increase in size as more features
are integrated (like the bean mapping). I
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Le 07/03/2012 12:57, sebb a écrit :
Since CSV is currently only a single package with very few classes,
would it perhaps be suitable as a part of an existing Commons
component?
[csv] is still small but will probably
Hi all,
IMHO if you could implement the readers as XMLReader instances, you
can get benefit from the powerful Digester matching rules and POJOs
mapping.
I had a spike with Digester reading JSON via a javacc grammar but it
was not complete so never proposed it.
just my 0.002 cents,
-Simo
As the original creator of [flatfile] it would be interesting to see
how difficult it would be to make [flatfile] do any of the things that
[csv] can currently do; e.g. [flatfile] can already handle a delimited
column structure.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Simone Tripodi
+1
Siegfried Goeschl
On 06.03.12 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers,
+1 as well
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Siegfried Goeschl sgoes...@gmx.at wrote:
+1
Siegfried Goeschl
On 06.03.12 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API looks incomplete to me without this
- Examine the
I'm not an committer, but I've been monitoring the CSV project for a
couple of years and I'm really happy to see it trying to emerge from
the sandbox. If it does go to release, I will be dropping OpenCsv and
switching to it for my projects both personal and professional.
Please accept my virtual
+1
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle
On 03/06/2012 06:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API
+1
On 2012-03-06 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API
+1
On 6 March 2012 19:35, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On 2012-03-06 18:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
- Handle CSV headers, a CSV API looks incomplete to me
Le 06/03/2012 22:09, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Let's not hesitate to go to Java 6 if it helps.
Gary
I do consider Java 6. I'm pondering if Commons CSV can be plugged with
JAXB to implement the bean parsing.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
+1
Niall
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote:
Commons CSV is approaching a releasable state. Considering the general
interest in this component I think it's time to promote it to Commons
proper.
There are a few points I'd like to address before a release:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
It's not just for comma-separated values. I'd rather us come up with
a more generic name. I'm +1 for moving it out of the sandbox. It
needs a bit of polish before a release, though, IMHO.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM,
On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
Given the release by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to
revisit that discussion.
It would solve any package name clashes without needing to call it
Let's start a separate thread for naming then.
Gary
On Mar 6, 2012, at 20:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
It's not just for comma-separated values. I'd rather us come up with
a more generic name. I'm +1
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:51 PM, sebb wrote:
On 7 March 2012 01:43, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I still think it should be renamed, but I think I lost that battle.
Given the release by Solr, perhaps now would be a good time to
revisit that discussion.
It would solve any
22 matches
Mail list logo
