oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de /divdivDate:09/20/2014 09:55
(GMT-05:00) /divdivTo: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
/divdivSubject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows
binary package
with signed executables /divdiv
/div+1
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 um 23:05 schrieb
: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
/divdivSubject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows
binary package
with signed executables /divdiv
/div+1
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 um 23:05 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
After a few teething problems with the signing
On 2014-09-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
What is the status of this VOTE?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201409.mbox/%3C541FF178.1030204%40apache.org%3E
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2014-09-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
What is the status of this VOTE?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201409.mbox/%3C541FF178.1030204%40apache.org%3E
Thanks!
Gary
Stefan
to be valid.
Mark
Gary
div Original message /divdivFrom: Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de /divdivDate:09/20/2014 09:55 (GMT-05:00)
/divdivTo: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
/divdivSubject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15
+1
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 um 23:05 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release.
The zip is
1.0.15 windows
binary package
with signed executables /divdiv
/div+1
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 um 23:05 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
where the Windows
Ping.
This vote has been open for more than 72 hours and has only attracted
one binding PMC vote.
Please could I ask folks, and PMC members in particular, to take a look
at this. It should be an easy vote since the binary is almost identical
to the 1.0.15 binary already released.
Cheers,
Mark
On 19 September 2014 10:13, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Ping.
This vote has been open for more than 72 hours and has only attracted
one binding PMC vote.
Please could I ask folks, and PMC members in particular, to take a look
at this. It should be an easy vote since the binary is
+1
could see the signature on my Win7 VM and Windows seemed to like it.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
All,
After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release.
The zip is identical to this file:
On 15/09/2014 22:05, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release.
The zip is identical to
Hello,
+1 from me, too.
(even when I am not so sure that code signing in OSS projects/upstream
projects is always usefull).
Gruss
Bernd
BTW: at my shop, we use the Eclipse CBI signing plugin (server based).
http://git.eclipse.org/c/cbi/org.eclipse.cbi.maven.plugins.git/about/
Am Mon, 15 Sep
13 matches
Mail list logo
