Hi Benedikt,
On 26.10.16 21:35, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> I have discovered one problem. The release tag and the source archive have
> differing contents:
>
>> diff -wqr commons-jcs-dist-2.0-beta-2 TAG
> Only in TAG: .gitignore
> Only in TAG: .svn
> Only in commons-jcs-dist-2.0-beta-2/: LICENSE
>
On 21.10.16 19:42, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
Ok, I'll check out the problems with the Tomcat library and cut an RC2
Thanks to all the testers.
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe,
Am 26.10.2016 um 21:21 schrieb Thomas Vandahl:
> Am 25.10.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Oliver Heger :
>> when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The
>> build with Java 1.8 is successful.
>>
>> On the distributions, I found some problems:
>> - Both
2016-10-26 21:55 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> Why not make the component require Java 7 and be done with it?
>
>
no objection from my side
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 2016-10-26 21:35 GMT+02:00
Why not make the component require Java 7 and be done with it?
Gary
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> 2016-10-26 21:35 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
>
> > Hello Thomas,
> >
> > Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr.,
2016-10-26 21:35 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42 Uhr:
>
> > I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
> >
> > Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
> >
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42 Uhr:
> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
>
> Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r16621).
>
> Maven artifacts
Am 25.10.2016 um 21:38 schrieb Oliver Heger :
> when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The
> build with Java 1.8 is successful.
>
> On the distributions, I found some problems:
> - Both the source and the binary distribution deflate in the
> Am 26.10.2016 um 00:19 schrieb sebb :
> Reminder: releases cannot be vetoed [1]
> They pass if there are at least 3 +1 and more +1 than -1.
>
You're technically right, however -1 votes tend to keep others from voting.
We could need your vote, too.
> However I have just
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 21:06 Uhr:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take another
> > look tonight.
>
> Could you please reconsider your vote? I
Hello Sebastian,
sebb schrieb am Mi., 26. Okt. 2016 um 00:25 Uhr:
> On 25 October 2016 at 20:06, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> > Hi Benedikt,
> >
> > On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >> Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take
>
On 25 October 2016 at 20:06, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take another
>> look tonight.
>
> Could you please reconsider your vote? I fixed the check sums so give
Hi,
when building on Windows 10 with Java 1.6 I get the error below. The
build with Java 1.8 is successful.
On the distributions, I found some problems:
- Both the source and the binary distribution deflate in the same
folder. Typically, different folders are used.
- The binary distribution does
Hi Benedikt,
On 24.10.16 08:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Sorry, if that has been decided, I must have missed it. I'll take another
> look tonight.
Could you please reconsider your vote? I fixed the check sums so give it
one more chance!
Bye, Thomas
2016-10-24 21:03 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl :
> Hi Romain,
>
> On 24.10.16 12:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > +1, thanks Thomas
> >
> > Side note: the tck module has been deactivated cause of packaging=pom but
> > ran it manually and all tests passed so not an issue for the
Hi Romain,
On 24.10.16 12:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> +1, thanks Thomas
>
> Side note: the tck module has been deactivated cause of packaging=pom but
> ran it manually and all tests passed so not an issue for the release since
> we don't care of this artifact distribution, just here as a
On 21.10.16 19:42, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
My own vote.
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe,
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 24.10.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Johannes Weberhofer
> :
>
>
>
> Am 21.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Thomas Vandahl:
>> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
>>
>> Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
>>
On 24 October 2016 at 07:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Thomas
>
> Thomas Vandahl schrieb am So., 23. Okt. 2016 um 12:16 Uhr:
>
>> Hi Benedikt,
>>
>> On 23.10.16 10:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> > Hello Thomas,
>> >
>> > The build works with Java 8 and
Am 21.10.2016 um 19:42 schrieb Thomas Vandahl:
I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r16621).
Maven artifacts are at:
+1, thanks Thomas
Side note: the tck module has been deactivated cause of packaging=pom but
ran it manually and all tests passed so not an issue for the release since
we don't care of this artifact distribution, just here as a runner.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
Hello Thomas
Thomas Vandahl schrieb am So., 23. Okt. 2016 um 12:16 Uhr:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 23.10.16 10:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Hello Thomas,
> >
> > The build works with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9.
> >
> > But the md5 and SHA1 files are missing in the dist area.
> >
> >
Hi Benedikt,
On 23.10.16 10:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> The build works with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9.
>
> But the md5 and SHA1 files are missing in the dist area.
>
> -1
>
I thought the signatures were sufficient. I added the check sums with
r16631. Please check again.
Hello Thomas,
The build works with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9.
But the md5 and SHA1 files are missing in the dist area.
-1
Benedikt
Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42 Uhr:
> I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
>
> Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2
I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component.
Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC1 is available for review at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r16621).
Maven artifacts are at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1211 .
The Subversion tag
25 matches
Mail list logo