[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-13 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 01.11.16 09:24, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component. The following votes were cast (in order of appearance): Romain Manni-Bucau: +1 (non binding) Johannes Weberhofer: +1 (non-binding) Gary Gregory: +1 Thomas Vandahl: +1 Bruno P. Kinoshita: +1 The vote has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
;Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 9:24 PM >Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2 > > >I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component. >The issues found with RC1 have been addressed. > >Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC2 is available for review at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-12 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 08.11.16 20:07, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Now how shall we proceed? >> >> I'd be willing to change the groupId/package name to >> org.apache.commons.jcs2 or whatever if you insist that >> org.apache.commons.jcs has been wasted on 2.0-beta-1. >> > > I think we are good as is, keep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 08.11.16 10:26, sebb wrote: > > Alpha should be used for unstable API > > Beta would be for unstable Behaviour (i.e. implementation) > > That is exactly what happened. JCS actually has only 3 public API > classes, JCS,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-08 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 08.11.16 10:26, sebb wrote: > Alpha should be used for unstable API > Beta would be for unstable Behaviour (i.e. implementation) That is exactly what happened. JCS actually has only 3 public API classes, JCS, CacheAccess and CacheGroupAccess. These have been redesigned for the step from 1.3 to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-08 Thread sebb
On 8 November 2016 at 07:14, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le 8 nov. 2016 07:25, "Gary Gregory" a écrit : >> >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Oliver Heger > >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > sorry, I don't want to stand

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-07 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 8 nov. 2016 07:25, "Gary Gregory" a écrit : > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > sorry, I don't want to stand in the way of the release. It is just that > > in the past we used to be very careful

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-07 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi, > > sorry, I don't want to stand in the way of the release. It is just that > in the past we used to be very careful with artifacts deployed to Maven > central and their compatibility. When I did alpha and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-06 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, sorry, I don't want to stand in the way of the release. It is just that in the past we used to be very careful with artifacts deployed to Maven central and their compatibility. When I did alpha and beta releases for [configuration] 2.0 it was decided that these artifacts must not be published

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Gary Gregory
There is no need to maintain BC since 2.0 is not out. Changing package names and Maven coordinates must also happen hand in hand. Changing one means changing the other. Gary On Nov 5, 2016 1:37 PM, "Thomas Vandahl" wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On 05.11.16 21:18, Oliver Heger wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Hi Oliver, On 05.11.16 21:18, Oliver Heger wrote: > It seems that there are many breaking changes between this release and > beta1; for instance, the clirr report for the core component lists > numerous errors. Is it not against Commons policy to publish > incompatible artifacts with the same

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Oliver Heger
It seems that there are many breaking changes between this release and beta1; for instance, the clirr report for the core component lists numerous errors. Is it not against Commons policy to publish incompatible artifacts with the same maven and package coordinates to Maven central? Oliver Am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Good to know, TY. Hopefully someone will take the time to review over the weekend. Gary On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 05.11.16 20:24, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Time to tally? > > I would like to. However, AFAIK, we are one PMC vote short. > > Bye,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 05.11.16 20:24, Gary Gregory wrote: > Time to tally? I would like to. However, AFAIK, we are one PMC vote short. Bye, Thomas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Time to tally? Gary On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 01.11.16 09:24, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > My

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-05 Thread Thomas Vandahl
On 01.11.16 09:24, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > [X] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... My vote. Bye, Thomas - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-03 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 MD5, SHA-1, ASC OK. Everyone is reviewing these as well, right? Everything builds OK, site and all. Each modules could use a better description than "Apache Commons JCS is a distributed, versatile caching system." Gary On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-02 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
+1 from my side. When I build JCS on a NFS share, the following tests fail: testWrite_128BlockElement(org.apache.commons.jcs.auxiliary.disk.block.BlockDiskUnitTest) Time elapsed: 0.015 sec <<< FAILURE! junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Wrong number of blocks recorded. expected:<128>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1, thanks Thomas Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC2

2016-11-01 Thread Thomas Vandahl
I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component. The issues found with RC1 have been addressed. Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 RC2 is available for review at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jcs/ (r16762). Maven artifacts are at: