Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

> On Feb 8, 2017, at 7:17 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 8 February 2017 at 17:51, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This vote passes with (in order of appearance): >> >> Oliver Heger: +1 >> Benedikt Ritter: +1 >> Thomas Vandahl: +1 >> Rob Tompkins: +1 > >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

On 8 February 2017 at 17:51, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello, > > This vote passes with (in order of appearance): > > Oliver Heger: +1 > Benedikt Ritter: +1 > Thomas Vandahl: +1 > Rob Tompkins: +1 Sorry to be picky, but only the PMC votes are binding, i.e. the first 3. This is

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

P. Kinoshita <brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br> Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2017 6:43 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4 Hi Bruno, can you try export LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 ? Think some tests can desire to force the locale maybe (have the same having a french locale by defaul

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hello, This vote passes with (in order of appearance): Oliver Heger: +1 Benedikt Ritter: +1 Thomas Vandahl: +1 Rob Tompkins: +1 I'll proceed with the release procedure. Thanks to all who reviewed this and the last RC. -Rob > On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Formats:141 null >>>>>>>> expected: but >>>>>>>> was: >>>>>>>> ExtendedMessageFormatTest.testOverriddenBuiltinFormat: >>>>>>>> 253->checkBuiltInFormat:347->checkBuiltInFormat:376 format Pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

gt; but >>>>>>>> was:<1: 6[,543.]21> >>>>>>>> ExtendedMessageFormatTest.testExtendedAndBuiltInFormats:141 null >>>>>>>> expected: but >>>>>>>> was: >>>>>>>> ExtendedMessageFo

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

ors: 0, Skipped: 0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE >>>>>>> [INFO] ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

- >>>>>> [INFO] Total time: 11.385 s >>>>>> [INFO] Finished at: 2017-02-06T14:07:52-02:00 >>>>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 30M/328M >>>>>> [INFO] >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

1.8.0_111, vendor: Oracle Corporation >>>>> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre >>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-59-generic", arch: "amd64", family: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

t;> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >>>> OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-59-generic", arch: "amd64", family: >>>> "unix" >>>> >>>> >>>> Even though the JVM locale seems to b

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

set to local time, as well as the locale (or so >>> I think). Here's my output of running the `locale` command. >>> >>> /* --- snip --- */ >>> $ locale >>> LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >>> LANGUAGE=en_US >>> LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 >>> LC_NUME

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

R.UTF-8 >> LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" >> LC_MONETARY=pt_BR.UTF-8 >> LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" >> LC_PAPER=pt_BR.UTF-8 >> LC_NAME=pt_BR.UTF-8 >> LC_ADDRESS=pt_BR.UTF-8 >> LC_TELEPHONE=pt_BR.UTF-8 >> LC_MEASUREMENT=pt_BR.UTF-8 >> LC

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

_NAME=pt_BR.UTF-8 > LC_ADDRESS=pt_BR.UTF-8 > LC_TELEPHONE=pt_BR.UTF-8 > LC_MEASUREMENT=pt_BR.UTF-8 > LC_IDENTIFICATION=pt_BR.UTF-8 > LC_ALL= > /* --- snip --- */ > > I guess these failing tests would be a blocker issue for this beta > release? I can help making these tes

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

ale on those tests to be US only... Hope that helps, cheers Bruno - Original Message - From: Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Sent: Monday, 30 January 2017 12:14 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 bas

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hi Rob, On 30.01.17 15:14, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4). [...] Artifacts look good, signatures are ok, site looks good. My guess would be if you use Eclipse you can iron out most of the checkstyle errors at once

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Rob, I could help out with the checkstyle issues if you need the help and we can figure out how to partition it so we aren't stepping on each other. Thanks, Ray On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Feb 5, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Benedikt Ritter

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

> On Feb 5, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello Robert, > > sorry it took me to long to review this RC! Here are my observations: > > - Builds from source using Java 7 and 8 > - The release tag is not signed - since we could never do this in svn land, I >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hello Robert, sorry it took me to long to review this RC! Here are my observations: - Builds from source using Java 7 and 8 - The release tag is not signed - since we could never do this in svn land, I don’t consider this blocking. - .travis.yml is file missing in the source archive. It is not

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hi Rob, all my points from the previous RC have been addressed. +1 Great work! One minor thing I noticed: AFAIK, the md5 hashes have to be added to the files in the distribution area. Oliver Am 30.01.2017 um 15:14 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hello Robert, > Am 02.02.2017 um 16:41 schrieb Rob Tompkins : > >> >> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4). >> >> Tag name: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

> On Feb 2, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Gilles wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:41:17 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:41:17 -0500, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: Hello all, This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4). Tag name: commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4 (signature can be checked from git

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

> On Jan 30, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4). > > Tag name: > commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4 (signature can be checked from git using 'git > tag -v') > > Tag URL: > >

[VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 based on RC4

Hello all, This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.0-beta-1 (from RC4). Tag name: commons-text-1.0-beta-1-RC4 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') Tag URL: