Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On 2015-02-27, Gary Gregory wrote: What is the conclusion of this vote thread? Did I miss a CANCEL or RESULT email while I was gone? http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201502.mbox/%3C87oapdqxa0.fsf%40v35516.1blu.de%3E Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

What is the conclusion of this vote thread? Did I miss a CANCEL or RESULT email while I was gone? Gary On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2015-01-30, Benedikt Ritter wrote: What will happen if a client has overwritten a method from

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote: On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote: - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be? This is only there

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On 2015-01-30, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: The superclass of ZCompressorInputStream has changed from one we've removed with the old __internal__ package to a new one in the now supported lzw package. Well, we cannot break BC

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

Hello Stefan, 2015-01-30 20:41 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org: On 2015-01-30, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: The superclass of ZCompressorInputStream has changed from one we've removed with the old __internal__

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

Le 30/01/2015 17:48, Gary Gregory a écrit : Well, we cannot break BC in a minor release for a public class. Are we sure BC breaks? If we want to make this internal package public, it needs to be copied to the new location, not moved. Then ZCompressorInputStream would still extend the

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On 30 January 2015 at 16:48, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote: On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote: -

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote: On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote: - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be? This is only there for historical reasons, I don't even think the other components still have a

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good. The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed. I'm +1 on the release as such (but we'd normally recut or leave this decision to the RM). Krisian 2015-01-27 7:35 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On 2015-01-27, Gary Gregory wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good. The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed. I'm +1 on the release as such (but

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good. The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed. I'm +1 on the release as such (but we'd normally recut or leave this

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

2015-01-27 15:24 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: I'd prefer a clean RC to give a positive vote. So I'll abstain for now. That seems to be the norm :) K - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

2015-01-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: Tests: Running: 'mvn clean site' gave me Failed tests: ZipTestCase.testCopyRawZip64EntryFromFile:361-assertSameFileContents:414 arrays first differed at element [10]; expected:-16 but was:-15 The problem appears to be that

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

Done in r1654980. This whole incident is a confirmation of murphys law; I must've run that test 500 times on my machine without failure =:) K 2015-01-27 0:10 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: I see you changed the test but the code could benefit from a comment to avoid a future

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

I see you changed the test but the code could benefit from a comment to avoid a future regression back to this problem. Gary On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Kristian Rosenvold krosenv...@apache.org wrote: Testcase fixed in r1654901 Kristian 2015-01-26 22:37 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

Thank you for preparing this RC Stefan. Using with src zip from binary dist folder: MD5 OK. ASC OK. Tests: Running: 'mvn clean site' gave me Failed tests: ZipTestCase.testCopyRawZip64EntryFromFile:361-assertSameFileContents:414 arrays first differed at element [10]; expected:-16 but was:-15

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

Testcase fixed in r1654901 Kristian 2015-01-26 22:37 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com: 2015-01-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: Tests: Running: 'mvn clean site' gave me Failed tests:

[VOTE] Release Compress 1.10 Based on RC1

As inidcated last week, here is the first RC for Compress 1.10. Compress 1.10 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/ (svn revision 7828) Maven artifacts are here: