Maybe a bit late in the game, but still:
In face of the fact, that we are already looking at a multi module project:
Having all the examples within a dedicated module added into the
hierarchy would allow us, to have it all, and still without burdening
the RM:
- keeping the examples current
> Advertising
> the examples at a higher level in the project site is better, so adding
> them to the user guide is an appropriate place. The question then is should
> the higher location point the user to the module site index, recommend
> downloading the source release which contains all the
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 04:01, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le ven. 6 août 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen a
> écrit :
> >
> > Gilles,
> >
> > > I do _not_ ask any work to be done in order to complicate the release
> > > process and/or review.
> > > My question was (cf. above and the other thread)
Le ven. 6 août 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen a écrit :
>
> Gilles,
>
> > I do _not_ ask any work to be done in order to complicate the release
> > process and/or review.
> > My question was (cf. above and the other thread) whether singling out
> > the "examples" module has any benefit (apart from
Gilles,
> I do _not_ ask any work to be done in order to complicate the release
> process and/or review.
> My question was (cf. above and the other thread) whether singling out
> the "examples" module has any benefit (apart from saving a few bytes
> on Maven Central).
Yes, I believe it is
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 17:23, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 18:01, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 14:07, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 14:08, Gary Gregory a
> > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > I agree with Matt.
> > >
> > >
Hi.
Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 18:01, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 14:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 14:08, Gary Gregory a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > I agree with Matt.
> >
> > Nobody seems to disagree (about not providing convenience *binaries*
> > of the
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 14:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 14:08, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
> >
> > I agree with Matt.
>
> Nobody seems to disagree (about not providing convenience *binaries*
> of the examples).
> My point was that the examples _must_ be part of the (source)
Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 14:08, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> I agree with Matt.
Nobody seems to disagree (about not providing convenience *binaries*
of the examples).
My point was that the examples _must_ be part of the (source) release
(with the caveat that they are not subject to BC), in the same
I agree with Matt.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, 07:26 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> > I think it is preferable to perform the release using only the public API
> > modules. The examples will be released in the source tarball.
>
> +1
>
> > The question is whether the examples require some additional
>
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 12:27, Matt Juntunen
wrote:
> > I think it is preferable to perform the release using only the public API
> > modules. The examples will be released in the source tarball.
>
> +1
>
> > The question is whether the examples require some additional
> advertisement
> > on the
> I think it is preferable to perform the release using only the public API
> modules. The examples will be released in the source tarball.
+1
> The question is whether the examples require some additional advertisement
> on the main website, for example an additional page, or section in the
On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 01:40, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 01:46, sebb a écrit :
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 13:38, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 04:27, Matt Juntunen
> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I apologize
Le jeu. 5 août 2021 à 01:46, sebb a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 13:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 04:27, Matt Juntunen a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
> > > land
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 13:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 04:27, Matt Juntunen a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
> > land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of
> > example
Hi.
Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 04:27, Matt Juntunen a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
> land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of
> example code modules? I've included the example module binaries in
> previous
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 03:27, Matt Juntunen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
> land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of
> example code modules? I've included the example module binaries in
> previous releases of
Hello,
I apologize if this was resolved already and I missed it, but did we
land anywhere on the issue of whether or not to release binaries of
example code modules? I've included the example module binaries in
previous releases of numbers and geometry but I don't think that they
are actually
18 matches
Mail list logo
