Re: [all] Deploying components

Hello Stian, > Am 05.06.2017 um 18:58 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes : > > Personally I am happy about source distributions accompanying the jars in > Maven Central, which are actually rebuildable as opposed to the > -source.jars. > > they continue to be retrievable using Maven

Re: [all] Deploying components

I have used bin zips before to get to DLL files for example. Gary On Jun 5, 2017 9:58 AM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > Personally I am happy about source distributions accompanying the jars in > Maven Central, which are actually rebuildable as opposed to the > -source.jars.

Re: [all] Deploying components

Personally I am happy about source distributions accompanying the jars in Maven Central, which are actually rebuildable as opposed to the -source.jars. they continue to be retrievable using Maven version mechanisms, compares to more fragile scripts crawling archive.apache.org (dist only contains

Re: [all] Deploying components

On 5 June 2017 at 12:06, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Rob, > >> Am 28.05.2017 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Tompkins : >> >> Hello all, >> >> Benedikt and I were chatting last week about how the .tar and .zip >> distributions get uploaded to nexus during "mvn

Re: [all] Deploying components

> On Jun 5, 2017, at 7:06 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello Rob, > >> Am 28.05.2017 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Tompkins : >> >> Hello all, >> >> Benedikt and I were chatting last week about how the .tar and .zip >> distributions get uploaded to nexus

Re: [all] Deploying components

Hello Rob, > Am 28.05.2017 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Tompkins : > > Hello all, > > Benedikt and I were chatting last week about how the .tar and .zip > distributions get uploaded to nexus during "mvn deploy” and how annoying that > side effect of the deployment happens to be.