Oh.
Then I guess work in this thread is already done.
Oh wait.
You might need this:
https://github.com/apache/commons-graph/pull/2
Gilles Sadowski 于2020年6月13日周六 上午10:11写道：
> 2020-06-13 4:05 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> >> This discussion requires another thread.
> >
> > Well I don't think so, as I
2020-06-13 4:05 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
>> This discussion requires another thread.
>
> Well I don't think so, as I think this thread aims for making travis-ci can
> pass.
No; this thread was about setting up Travis (as asked by Amey).
> [...]
> This discussion requires another thread.
Well I don't think so, as I think this thread aims for making travis-ci can
pass.
And test failures are the reason why it cannot pass ci for now.
I don't see the value in creating another thread.
Btw: I tested (if my memory are correct, as I didn't make
2020-06-13 1:43 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> Done.
> Environment win10, jdk8.
> Due to the binary search, the last pr in this repo who can pass all junit
> tests is commit 967b9bed79f51040597d68ef98512a24b0e94e41 , which is at
> 6/11/2011,10:43PM
> Suggest revert all changes after that time point,
Done.
Environment win10, jdk8.
Due to the binary search, the last pr in this repo who can pass all junit
tests is commit 967b9bed79f51040597d68ef98512a24b0e94e41 , which is at
6/11/2011,10:43PM
Suggest revert all changes after that time point, and track them one by one.
A project which can never
Two failures and one error actually.
I will try to fetch the latest commit who CAN pass junit test, using binary
search.
Will send mail when I finish.
Gilles Sadowski 于2020年6月13日周六 上午6:21写道：
> Hi.
>
> 2020-06-12 21:43 UTC+02:00, Amey Jadiye :
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 4:40 PM Gilles Sadowski
Hi.
2020-06-12 21:43 UTC+02:00, Amey Jadiye :
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 4:40 PM Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
>
>> 2020-06-12 12:32 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
>> > Hi.
>> > I see the current travis-ci scripts.
>> > Do we really care only jdk8?
>> > Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 4:40 PM Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> 2020-06-12 12:32 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> > Hi.
> > I see the current travis-ci scripts.
> > Do we really care only jdk8?
> > Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least adding openjdk11,
> > as it is a stable version?
> > Or
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 12:10, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> 2020-06-12 12:32 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> > Hi.
> > I see the current travis-ci scripts.
> > Do we really care only jdk8?
> > Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least adding openjdk11,
> > as it is a stable version?
> > Or
2020-06-12 12:32 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> Hi.
> I see the current travis-ci scripts.
> Do we really care only jdk8?
> Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least adding openjdk11,
> as it is a stable version?
> Or this repo has some known bug on jdk11?
>
Before refining, we should
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 11:33, Xeno Amess wrote:
> Hi.
> I see the current travis-ci scripts.
> Do we really care only jdk8?
> Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least adding openjdk11,
> as it is a stable version?
> Or this repo has some known bug on jdk11?
>
Targeting the LTS
Hi.
I see the current travis-ci scripts.
Do we really care only jdk8?
Should we also add at some other jdk versions, at least adding openjdk11,
as it is a stable version?
Or this repo has some known bug on jdk11?
Hi.
2020-06-11 23:54 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert :
>
>
>> On 11 Jun 2020, at 18:07, er...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>>
>> erans pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-graph.git
>>
> On 11 Jun 2020, at 18:07, er...@apache.org wrote:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> erans pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-graph.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to
14 matches
Mail list logo
