sebb wrote:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
[snip]
Some classes of [lang] are exposed in the public API of
[configuration]. For
On 11 September 2012 19:22, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
[snip]
Some
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46,
On 11 September 2012 20:27, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are
Hi Oliver,
there are a lot of @author tags. As far as I know, the use of author
tags is deprecated in commons, so the mentioned developers and
contributors should be moved to pom.xml and changes.xml.
Benedikt
2012/9/7 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to
Am 09.09.2012 18:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver,
there are a lot of @author tags. As far as I know, the use of author
tags is deprecated in commons, so the mentioned developers and
contributors should be moved to pom.xml and changes.xml.
Yes, this is true. When changing code, e.g.
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards
If you are going to break compatibility the package names need to be changed.
I really dislike CombinedConfiguration. Having the combined nodes point into
other configuration nodes makes reloading fragile which is why it now copies
nodes. This means that a DynamicCombinedConfiguration that
Am 08.09.2012 18:45, schrieb Ralph Goers:
If you are going to break compatibility the package names need to be changed.
I really dislike CombinedConfiguration. Having the combined nodes point into
other configuration nodes makes reloading fragile which is why it now copies
nodes. This means
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development
version. This means we are free to implement major changes without
having to enforce binary backwards compatibility.
The question is: What are the goals for version 2.0? I would recommend
to define a clear focus so
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards compatibility.
BC breakage will require
14 matches
Mail list logo
