Then I encourage 1.0-beta1 ;-)
Gary
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, 11:29 Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
> No objection from me :) 1.0b or 1.0, doing any progress on [Imaging] would
> be grand.
>
> -Bruno
>
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 17:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> > [Moving to "dev" ML...]
> >
> > Le jeu. 8
No objection from me :) 1.0b or 1.0, doing any progress on [Imaging] would
be grand.
-Bruno
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 17:11, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> [Moving to "dev" ML...]
>
> Le jeu. 8 déc. 2022 à 16:56, Gary Gregory a
> écrit :
> >
> > Since we had alpha releases, should we have a beta?
>
>
[Moving to "dev" ML...]
Le jeu. 8 déc. 2022 à 16:56, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Since we had alpha releases, should we have a beta?
+1
It would allow modifying the API in order to e.g. provide a code that
self-documents the caller's responsibility wrt validation of external
input. [Something
