On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Sébastien Brisard sebastien.bris...@m4x.org
wrote:
Hi,
the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the
MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments!
What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the
already existing lanczos
Hi Thomas,
Hi,
the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the
MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments!
What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the
already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for
the constant.
In
Hello.
the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the
MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments!
What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the
already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for
the constant.
I guess just
OK, I've cleaned up my mess, and attached the true patch to MATH-753.
Sorry about that.
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the
MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments!
What I have seen in the patch, you remove duplicated code by using the
already existing lanczos function, and create an additional function for
the constant.
In fact, I've
Hi,
I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a
satisfactory solution.
The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing
the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the argument
and/or the scale parameter.
As I initially feared, what was
On 05/08/2012 05:26 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hi,
I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a
satisfactory solution.
The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing
the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the argument
and/or
I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a
satisfactory solution.
The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing
the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the argument
and/or the scale parameter.
As I initially feared,
Hi Thomas,
2012/5/8 Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com:
On 05/08/2012 05:26 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hi,
I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a
satisfactory solution.
The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing
the density of
Hi Gilles,
2012/5/8 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org:
I've spent quite some time on MATH-753 [1], and I think I now have a
satisfactory solution.
The problem was to overcome the overflows which arise when computing
the density of the Gamma distribution for large values of the
Hi,
the patch for the proposed modification has been attached to the
MATH-753 ticket. Thanks for your comments!
Best regards,
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
11 matches
Mail list logo