Re: [math] missing deprecations?

2012-12-15 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:03:14PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: The classes in .optimization.fitting seem to have been duplicated / moved to .fitting, but the originals are not deprecated (though some methods in them are). Shouldn't we deprecate the original classes? Yes. In fact, all the

Re: [math] missing deprecations?

2012-12-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/15/12 4:07 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:03:14PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: The classes in .optimization.fitting seem to have been duplicated / moved to .fitting, but the originals are not deprecated (though some methods in them are). Shouldn't we deprecate the

Re: [math] missing deprecations?

2012-12-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/15/12 8:50 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/15/12 4:07 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:03:14PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: The classes in .optimization.fitting seem to have been duplicated / moved to .fitting, but the originals are not deprecated (though some methods in

[math] missing deprecations?

2012-12-14 Thread Phil Steitz
The classes in .optimization.fitting seem to have been duplicated / moved to .fitting, but the originals are not deprecated (though some methods in them are). Shouldn't we deprecate the original classes? Also, @since for the moved versions should be 3.1, correct? Phil