Re: [parent][rng] japicmp binary compatibility for interface default methods

2022-05-10 Thread Alex Herbert
On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 14:59, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 10 mai 2022 à 09:53, Alex Herbert a > écrit : > > > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 02:32, Matt Juntunen > > wrote: > > > > > Sounds reasonable to me. Are there any arguments against this change > > > other than the fact that it is not a

Re: [parent][rng] japicmp binary compatibility for interface default methods

2022-05-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 10 mai 2022 à 09:53, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 02:32, Matt Juntunen > wrote: > > > Sounds reasonable to me. Are there any arguments against this change > > other than the fact that it is not a japicmp default setting? > > > > I do not know why the setting default

Re: [parent][rng] japicmp binary compatibility for interface default methods

2022-05-10 Thread Alex Herbert
On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 02:32, Matt Juntunen wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. Are there any arguments against this change > other than the fact that it is not a japicmp default setting? > I do not know why the setting default is at the current value. Unlike the documentation for revapi there is

Re: [parent][rng] japicmp binary compatibility for interface default methods

2022-05-09 Thread Matt Juntunen
Sounds reasonable to me. Are there any arguments against this change other than the fact that it is not a japicmp default setting? -Matt J On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:59 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > > I would like to change some current interface methods in Commons RNG to > have a default

[parent][rng] japicmp binary compatibility for interface default methods

2022-05-09 Thread Alex Herbert
I would like to change some current interface methods in Commons RNG to have a default implementation. This is detected as not allowed by the current japicmp settings in commons parent. I think the settings should be updated. The default settings for japicmp state that default methods introduced