Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

I would cd into ./target/commons-release-plugin/scm and try the svn commit from there manually. That’s the directory where everything gets staged. I also think your svn password gets cached generally, but that’s predicated on having checked something into svn previously. Given our recent

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 4 Nov 2019, at 19:31, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > >> On 4 Nov 2019, at 18:38, Rob Tompkins > > wrote: >> >> Also keep me posted. I’ll be near my keyboard all day. -Rob >> >>> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Rob Tompkins >> > wrote: >>>

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 4 Nov 2019, at 18:38, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Also keep me posted. I’ll be near my keyboard all day. -Rob > >> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >>  >> >>> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Alex Herbert wrote: >>> >>>  > On 04/11/2019 17:36, Alex Herbert wrote:

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Also keep me posted. I’ll be near my keyboard all day. -Rob > On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:21 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >  > >> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Alex Herbert wrote: >> >>  On 04/11/2019 17:36, Alex Herbert wrote: >>> >>> On 04/11/2019 15:40, Alex Herbert wrote: On

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:16 PM, Alex Herbert wrote: > >  >> On 04/11/2019 17:36, Alex Herbert wrote: >> >> >>> On 04/11/2019 15:40, Alex Herbert wrote: >>> >>> On 04/11/2019 12:43, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 4 nov. 2019 à 13:05, Alex Herbert a écrit : >

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 04/11/2019 17:36, Alex Herbert wrote: On 04/11/2019 15:40, Alex Herbert wrote: On 04/11/2019 12:43, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 4 nov. 2019 à 13:05, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 04/11/2019 00:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. [...] So there are at least two options: 1.

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 04/11/2019 15:40, Alex Herbert wrote: On 04/11/2019 12:43, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 4 nov. 2019 à 13:05, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 04/11/2019 00:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. [...] So there are at least two options: 1. Release using JDK 9 +1 OK. I'll run through

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 04/11/2019 12:43, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 4 nov. 2019 à 13:05, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 04/11/2019 00:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. [...] So there are at least two options: 1. Release using JDK 9 +1 OK. I'll run through the release with JDK 9. I do not think we

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hello. Le lun. 4 nov. 2019 à 13:05, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 04/11/2019 00:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > > >> [...] > >> > >> So there are at least two options: > >> > >> 1. Release using JDK 9 > > +1 > > OK. I'll run through the release with JDK 9. I do not think we have any >

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 04/11/2019 00:42, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. [...] So there are at least two options: 1. Release using JDK 9 +1 OK. I'll run through the release with JDK 9. I do not think we have any NIO classes so the issue raised by Gary should not be present. I am looking at the clirr report

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hi. > [...] > > So there are at least two options: > > 1. Release using JDK 9 +1 > 2. Update the examples project to use source 11 for the Java modules code and > release using a non-oracle JDK 11 > > Note that updating to use source 11 will break the Jenkins build which uses > JDK 9 to run a

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 5:44 PM Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > On 3 Nov 2019, at 20:12, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 3 Nov 2019, at 19:30, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 10:01 AM Alex Herbert > > >> wrote:

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 3 Nov 2019, at 20:12, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > >> On 3 Nov 2019, at 19:30, Gary Gregory > > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 10:01 AM Alex Herbert > > >> wrote: >> >>> I think everything is finalised for a release of

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 3 Nov 2019, at 19:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 10:01 AM Alex Herbert > wrote: > >> I think everything is finalised for a release of RNG, namely: >> >> All bugs and issues with SonarCloud and LGTM.com are fixed. >> The user guide has been updated for all the new

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 10:01 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > I think everything is finalised for a release of RNG, namely: > > All bugs and issues with SonarCloud and LGTM.com are fixed. > The user guide has been updated for all the new features. > The performance and quality results have been updated

[rng] Releasing 1.3

I think everything is finalised for a release of RNG, namely: All bugs and issues with SonarCloud and LGTM.com are fixed. The user guide has been updated for all the new features. The performance and quality results have been updated in the user guide. Any objections to me cutting a release

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Thank you sir. I apologise for any inconvenience caused. Regards, Abhishek On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:38 AM Alex Herbert wrote: > > > On 16 Sep 2019, at 17:47, Abhishek Dhadwal > wrote: > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I apologise for the delay in the release. My luck has provided me with > back > >

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 16 Sep 2019, at 17:47, Abhishek Dhadwal wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > I apologise for the delay in the release. My luck has provided me with back > to back bouts of food poisoning and viral infections, so, systems are down > at the moment. > Before I got infected, I researched around and found

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hi Alex, I apologise for the delay in the release. My luck has provided me with back to back bouts of food poisoning and viral infections, so, systems are down at the moment. Before I got infected, I researched around and found the following resources which I intend to use as my references : The

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 30/08/2019 14:11, Abhishek Dhadwal wrote: Hello, What would be the deadline for the release ? If it’s not too early I could resolve RNG-111 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-111) over the next few days. I couldn’t work on it before due to back to back college project evaluations

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

the relative speed of the RNG on 64-bit output. > > I would suggest dropping the table showing the Marsaglia normalised > Gaussian sampler (it is redundant given the comparison of different > Gaussian samplers) +1 > and adding a shuffle benchmark for different array sizes. -0 (cf. ab

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

the comparison of different Gaussian samplers) and adding a shuffle benchmark for different array sizes. More on RNG-32 below... Best, Gilles Regards, Abhishek Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Gilles Sadowski Sent: 30 August 2019 17:22 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

10 > > From: Gilles Sadowski > Sent: 30 August 2019 17:22 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3 > > Hi. > > Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit > : > > > > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >

RE: [rng] Releasing 1.3

by tomorrow). Regards, Abhishek Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Gilles Sadowski Sent: 30 August 2019 17:22 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3 Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote:

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? > >> Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items [...] Status? In particular could we resolve

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> > [...] > > [...] is that check > > ---CUT--- > > if (!(source.normalized instanceof SharedStateSampler)) { > > throw new UnsupportedOperationException("The underlying > > sampler is not a SharedStateSampler"); > > } > > ---CUT--- > > necessary? > > That was

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 31/07/2019 00:49, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 22:07, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 30 Jul 2019, at 19:28, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 15:38, Alex Herbert mailto:alex.d.herb...@gmail.com>> a écrit : On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote:

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 22:07, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > > > On 30 Jul 2019, at 19:28, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 15:38, Alex Herbert > > a écrit : > >> > >> On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hello. >

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

> On 30 Jul 2019, at 19:28, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 15:38, Alex Herbert > a écrit : >> >> On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a >>> écrit :

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 30/07/2019 10:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items [...] Anything missing? - RNG-110: The PR for

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? > >> Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items [...] Anything missing? Regards, Gilles

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 10/06/2019 18:05, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 18:33, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:56, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 16:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hi. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 18:33, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:56, Alex Herbert a > > écrit : > >> > >> On 10/06/2019 16:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 10/06/2019 17:18, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:56, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 16:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Not yet.

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

Hello. Le lun. 10 juin 2019 à 17:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > > On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? > >> Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items that work together > >> for the multi-threaded focus of the new code and the new generators:

Re: [rng] Releasing 1.3

On 10/06/2019 15:31, Gilles Sadowski wrote: P.S. Thinking of releasing 1.3? Not yet. I think there are a few outstanding items that work together for the multi-threaded focus of the new code and the new generators: Sure but some of them could be postponed, if just to RERO. - RNG-98: