OK. You seem to like the feature.
Can I provide the patch for integration then? To whom should I send it?
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Mark Fortner phidia...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps not for local file systems, but I would imagine that any kind of
distributed file system would have need of
Hi Jean-Marc,
2013/2/6 Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com
OK. You seem to like the feature.
Can I provide the patch for integration then? To whom should I send it?
Please create an issue in JIRA [1] for vfs and attach your svn patch file
to it.
Benedikt
[1]
I found this entry in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-249
Actually it is not true that it is fixed. Looking at the code Ralph
Goers's explanation are not correct. It should be reopened.
I will create a new entry.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jean-Marc Borer
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-453
Patch will come soon
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Jean-Marc,
2013/2/6 Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com
OK. You seem to like the feature.
Can I provide the patch for integration then? To whom
Hi Benedikt,
When I will provide the patch, will it be integrated into VFS?
As I use Maven to build my projects, I would like to see my patch
beeing published then in the next release of VFS.
However do you know how long this takes usually? Is VFS releasing new
versions in short cycles or do we
Create a patch for trunk please.
Gary
On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:23, Jean-Marc Borer jmbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Benedikt,
When I will provide the patch, will it be integrated into VFS?
As I use Maven to build my projects, I would like to see my patch
beeing published then in the next release
Hello list members,
We need to be able to specify socket timeouts in VFS for HTTP and
WebDAV in our project so that request will no hang for ever in certain
conditions.
I have modified the sources of HttpFileSystemConfigBuilder and
HttpClientFactory to be able to configure this in HttpClient.
Just out of curiousity, is there a reason that socket timeouts shouldn't
also apply to all file systems in general?
Cheers,
Mark
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, make sure you base you patch on the latest from trunk.
Gary
On Tue, Feb 5,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Mark Fortner phidia...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiousity, is there a reason that socket timeouts shouldn't
also apply to all file systems in general?
How does a socket timeout make sense for a local file system, ZIP, and so
on?
Gary
Cheers,
Mark
Perhaps not for local file systems, but I would imagine that any kind of
distributed file system would have need of a socket timeout.
Cheers,
Mark
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Mark Fortner phidia...@gmail.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
