Re: [ALL] Automated requirements (e.g. CheckStyle)? (Was: [MATH] Enforce run [...])

2017-08-08 Thread Karl-Philipp Richter
Hi, Am 07.08.2017 um 15:09 schrieb Gilles: > Less work for the maintainers is good. :-) > > By "taking time" I meant that validating should not be enforced when > calling "mvn compile" or "mvn test". I wouldn't worry about the time consumption of the validation even if it's run by every dev

Re: [ALL] Automated requirements (e.g. CheckStyle)? (Was: [MATH] Enforce run [...])

2017-08-07 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:49:16 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote: On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:08:45 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote: On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. On Fri, 4

Re: [ALL] Automated requirements (e.g. CheckStyle)? (Was: [MATH] Enforce run [...])

2017-08-07 Thread Allon Mureinik
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:08:45 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >> Hello. >>> >>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik

Re: [ALL] Automated requirements (e.g. CheckStyle)? (Was: [MATH] Enforce run [...])

2017-08-07 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:08:45 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote: On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles wrote: Hello. On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote: We had a similar discussion about Configuration. Personally, I'm all for enforcing

Re: [ALL] Automated requirements (e.g. CheckStyle)? (Was: [MATH] Enforce run [...])

2017-08-07 Thread Allon Mureinik
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hello. > > On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote: > >> We had a similar discussion about Configuration. >> >> Personally, I'm all for enforcing checkstyle during the validate phase, >> but >> we