Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2012/7/26 Bruno P. Kinoshita : > > >> >> From: Benedikt Ritter >>To: Commons Developers List >>Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM >>Subject: Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID >> >>2012/7/26 sebb : >>> On 26

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread Simone Tripodi
; -Elijah > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita > wrote: >> >> >>> >>> From: Benedikt Ritter >>>To: Commons Developers List >>>Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM >>>Subject: Re: [chain2]

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread Elijah Zupancic
sday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM >>Subject: Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID >> >>2012/7/26 sebb : >>> On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >>>>> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>>

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
> > From: Benedikt Ritter >To: Commons Developers List >Sent: Thursday, 26 July 2012 3:28 PM >Subject: Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID > >2012/7/26 sebb : >> On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2012/7/26 sebb : > On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: sebb wrote: > On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Elijah, >> >> Elijah Zupancic wrote: >> >>>

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread sebb
On 26 July 2012 18:29, Brent Worden wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> sebb wrote: >>> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Elijah, > > Elijah Zupancic wrote: > >> Thanks Jörg! >>

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread Brent Worden
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: > On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> >>> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Elijah, Elijah Zupancic wrote: > Thanks Jörg! > > It sounds like we will need to change them all in chai

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-26 Thread sebb
On 25 July 2012 07:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: > sebb wrote: > >> On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> Hi Elijah, >>> >>> Elijah Zupancic wrote: >>> Thanks Jörg! It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we have changed the package name. >>> >>> W

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-24 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: > On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Elijah, >> >> Elijah Zupancic wrote: >> >>> Thanks Jörg! >>> >>> It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we >>> have changed the package name. >> >> Well, since they are all different objects now, the Java run

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-24 Thread sebb
On 24 July 2012 09:11, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Elijah, > > Elijah Zupancic wrote: > >> Thanks Jörg! >> >> It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we >> have changed the package name. > > Well, since they are all different objects now, the Java runtime will not > try to ma

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-24 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Elijah, if you need a introduction to serialization, I recommend to read the corresponding chapters in Effective Java by Josh Blooch [1]. Regards, Benedikt [1] http://www.amazon.com/Effective-Java-Edition-Joshua-Bloch/dp/0321356683/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1343119885&sr=8-1&keywords=effective+

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-24 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Elijah, Elijah Zupancic wrote: > Thanks Jörg! > > It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we > have changed the package name. Well, since they are all different objects now, the Java runtime will not try to match them anyway, so it is for this special case not really

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-23 Thread Elijah Zupancic
Thanks Jörg! It sounds like we will need to change them all in chain because we have changed the package name. -Elijah On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Elijah > > Elijah Zupancic wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Now that we have changed the chain API to not be backwards

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Elijah Elijah Zupancic wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that we have changed the chain API to not be backwards compatible > in the 2.0 release, should we change the version number in the > serialVersionUID fields as well? It seems to me that would make sense, > but I'm a bit of a newbie when it

Re: [chain2] serialVersionUID

2012-07-23 Thread Elijah Zupancic
Hi everyone, Now that we have changed the chain API to not be backwards compatible in the 2.0 release, should we change the version number in the serialVersionUID fields as well? It seems to me that would make sense, but I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to managing their versions. I was wonderi