Re: svn commit: r1742696 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/build.xml

Am 08.05.2016 um 10:51 schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst: > Am 07.05.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Oliver Heger: >> Thank you for updating build.xml. >> >> There has been some discussion to drop the ant build completely as it >> tends to become outdated. Most Commons components already did this, and >> I would

Re: svn commit: r1742696 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/build.xml

Am 07.05.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Thank you for updating build.xml. > > There has been some discussion to drop the ant build completely as it > tends to become outdated. Most Commons components already did this, and > I would be in favor of this. > > Definitely +1, I was wondering why

Re: svn commit: r1742696 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/build.xml

+1 Oliver Heger schrieb am Sa., 7. Mai 2016 um 16:44: > Thank you for updating build.xml. > > There has been some discussion to drop the ant build completely as it > tends to become outdated. Most Commons components already did this, and > I would be in favor of

Re: svn commit: r1742696 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/build.xml

Thank you for updating build.xml. There has been some discussion to drop the ant build completely as it tends to become outdated. Most Commons components already did this, and I would be in favor of this. WDYT? Oliver Am 07.05.2016 um 11:41 schrieb d...@apache.org: > Author: deki > Date: Sat