Working on Imaging to get out 1.0 is on my list when I have more time for
commons again. Nice to see some activity here.
2014-10-16 7:08 GMT+02:00 Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com:
Thank you :).
There's lots of issues to close first, and I think 0.98 would be more
appropriate.
The API
Go for it!
2014-10-15 22:12 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de:
Hi,
there are currently a few fixes available for [beanutils] related to
changes introduced with the 1.9.x releases. In order to stabilize this
series, I would like to push out a new release - there has already
ok so it means we are ready to release?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-16 2:06 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1
as the groupId
Do we want to keep the JCS name or switch to a more generic name like
commons-cache or commons-caching?
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
I think jcs is nice since it keeps this history the project has.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-16 8:49 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org:
Do we want to keep the JCS name or switch to a
On 16.10.14 02:06, sebb wrote:
On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Perso I don' get the point to use this version number at the end of
the artifactId
The idea is that if the package name has to be changed again, i.e. to
org.apache.commons.jcs2, then the artifactId
On 16.10.14 00:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 15/10/2014 23:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Hm, no, the last item to agree on is the artifact Id. So... Some folks like
me like commons-jcs2 and other(s?) commons-jcs.
My preference goes to commons-jcs without the version appended. That's
not
On 16.10.14 08:35, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
ok so it means we are ready to release?
As far As I'm concerned: Go ahead.
Please check JIRAs and docs.
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
If everybody is ok with a 2.0-alpha-1 can someone create this version
on jira please?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-16 10:37 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org:
On 16.10.14 08:35, Romain
Le 16/10/2014 11:19, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
If everybody is ok with a 2.0-alpha-1 can someone create this version
on jira please?
Or rename the version 2.0 to 2.0-alpha-1, this avoids reaffecting the bugs.
It looks like JCS isn't configured like the other Commons components in
JIRA, I
On 16.10.14 11:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
If everybody is ok with a 2.0-alpha-1 can someone create this version
on jira please?
Done.
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
seems I can't do anything on jira,
here few action to do:
1) resolved as won't fix JCS-132 (we have to use java 7 for this tck module)
2) move JCS-130, JCS-119, JCS-116, JCS-16 to alpha2
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
On 16 October 2014 09:35, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 16.10.14 02:06, sebb wrote:
On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Perso I don' get the point to use this version number at the end of
the artifactId
The idea is that if the package name has to be
2014-10-16 13:48 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 09:35, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 16.10.14 02:06, sebb wrote:
On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Perso I don' get the point to use this version number at the end of
the artifactId
On 16 October 2014 13:02, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-16 13:48 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 09:35, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 16.10.14 02:06, sebb wrote:
On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Perso I
On 16.10.14 12:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
seems I can't do anything on jira,
here few action to do:
1) resolved as won't fix JCS-132 (we have to use java 7 for this tck module)
2) move JCS-130, JCS-119, JCS-116, JCS-16 to alpha2
Done.
Bye, Thomas.
On 16.10.14 12:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
seems I can't do anything on jira,
I have added you as committer to the project.
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
2014-10-16 14:40 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 13:02, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-16 13:48 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 09:35, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 16.10.14 02:06, sebb wrote:
On 16 October 2014
On 16 October 2014 14:30, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-16 14:40 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 13:02, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-10-16 13:48 GMT+02:00 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 16 October 2014 09:35, Thomas Vandahl
Once again, thank you Sebb for stepping in and explaining jar hell. It's
hellish just explaining it ;-)
Gary
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2014 14:30, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-10-16 14:40 GMT+02:00 sebb
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38430projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 15:42:01 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 15:43:30 +
Total time: 1m 29s
Build Trigger: Forced
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38431projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 15:49:01 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 15:50:38 +
Total time: 1m 37s
Build Trigger:
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38434projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:13:15 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:14:52 +
Total time: 1m 36s
Build Trigger:
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38435projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:21:27 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:22:53 +
Total time: 1m 25s
Build Trigger:
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38436projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:32:13 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:32:59 +
Total time: 46s
Build Trigger: Forced
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38437projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:40:11 +
Total time: 59s
Build Trigger: Forced
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38438projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:57:40 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 16:58:39 +
Total time: 58s
Build Trigger: Forced
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38442projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 17:09:07 +
Finished at: Thu 16 Oct 2014 17:10:33 +
Total time: 1m 26s
Build Trigger: Forced
OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now remove the
diff from JIRA.
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:36 AM, luc l...@spaceroots.org wrote:
Le 2014-10-14 15:16, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
Should I try an experiment with that with
To be honest, I really don't like this commit. My personal sense for
aesthetics put aside, you modified almost the whole code base. Patches
assigned to Jira tickets will probably no longer apply cleanly.
Oliver
Am 15.10.2014 um 22:15 schrieb ggreg...@apache.org:
Author: ggregory
Date: Wed Oct
On 14 October 2014 21:42, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Tue Oct 14 20:42:57 2014
New Revision: 1631874
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631874
Log:
Add maven-eclipse.xml and other Maven/Eclipse files to svn:ignore.
Added:
That should have been svn ignored. Arg. I'll have to fix when I get home.
Gary
div Original message /divdivFrom: sebb seb...@gmail.com
/divdivDate:10/16/2014 15:57 (GMT-05:00) /divdivTo:
dev@commons.apache.org /divdivCc: comm...@commons.apache.org
/divdivSubject: Re: svn
GitHub user jamessawle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/31
LANG-1050 Added new generic emptyToNull array method
Based upon the comments in
[JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1050), I have implemented a
new generic defensive
GitHub user jamessawle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/32
Lang-536
Added new isSorted methods to the ArrayUtils class, along with generic
implementations.
Some of the primitive methods have needed reverse-engineered Java 7
'compare'
GitHub user jamessawle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/33
LANG-1050 Generic nullToEmpty method
A generic nullToEmpty method has been created. The idea was to use this as
a base for all of the wrapper class methods; however this would break the
On 15 October 2014 14:19, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Wed Oct 15 13:19:50 2014
New Revision: 1632011
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1632011
Log:
Update Oracle Mail from 1.4.7 to 1.5.2.
Modified:
commons/proper/email/trunk/pom.xml
Modified:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:15 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 October 2014 14:19, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Wed Oct 15 13:19:50 2014
New Revision: 1632011
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1632011
Log:
Update Oracle Mail from 1.4.7 to 1.5.2.
Modified:
37 matches
Mail list logo
