Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #159

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: apache, commons, math

Thanks, Eric. I am OK with Commons Math being split into modules in the Commons Math sub-project. I am not OK with Commons Math A, Commons Math B, etc existing within Commons. In other words, when a user traverses to Commons Math they can then see the modules that make up Commons Math. I am

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs #159

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:00:34 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles [snip] >> You can never go home. No project stays the same. > > Well, some people in CM for years did their best to avoid change. > I didn't like that view and argue

Re: [CRYPTO] Possible new method for CryptoCipher interface; API evolution

I am not too keen to grow CryptoCipher to an abstract class (Java 8 or not) with additional methods that would not typically be implemented by implementing subclasses. The API of CC is quite low level, yes, but then adding higher level helpers there won't really help as it will be quite a

Re: [CRYPTO] Utils package

+1 to rename crypto.utils it to .internal, and then we are somewhat free to shrink it in 1.1. I see many things in there that could form a minimal Commons Native, e.g. to help with bundled native libraries and architecture detection. While perhaps less people deal with JNI now than 10 years ago,

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:53:37 -0500, Matt Benson wrote: > >> I think it is indicative of the position held by many, myself included, >> that a set of focused, math-related artifacts do not make sense at the >> Commons

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 01:55:12 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:00:34 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles [snip] You can never go home. No project stays the same. Well, some people in CM for years did their best to

Resign from PMC...

I wish to resign from the Apache Commons PMC. Thank you.

Re: [CRYPTO] Utils package

On 19 June 2016 at 01:30, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > +1 to rename crypto.utils it to .internal, and then we are somewhat free to > shrink it in 1.1. Also there are a couple of methods that are only called in one place so should be moved to the calling class: CRYPTO-83

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:42:46 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Gilles, >> >> Gilles wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: Gilles, Thanks for links. I just read that (long-winded) thread and I

Re: [CRYPTO] Utils package

On Jun 18, 2016 5:30 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote: > > +1 to rename crypto.utils it to .internal, and then we are somewhat free to > shrink it in 1.1. > > I see many things in there that could form a minimal Commons Native, e.g. > to help with bundled native libraries and

[GitHub] commons-cli pull request #4: Removing unnecessary subclassing of DefaultPars...

GitHub user august782 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/4 Removing unnecessary subclassing of DefaultParserTest The test class BugCLI252Test extends DefaultParserTest, but there is no need for it to do so as it does not use anything from

RE: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Being one of the non-participants that Gilles speaks of, perhaps it is easier for me to not have any baggage that filters what I see as perfectly plain actions. > -Original Message- > From: Gilles [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org] > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2016 10:56 > To:

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > - Incubator then TLP > - Incubator then Commons Math There's no reason to distinguish those. It's initially the same, and both directions would be open, anyways. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent

[BCEL] Test failures when building site

Hi, when running mvn test I get: Tests run: 102, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 When I run mvn site I get 28 Errors (see below). Any idea why this happens? I'm building with: Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00) Maven home:

Re: svn commit: r1748880 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/bcel/ElementValueGenTestCase.java

Hello Gary, please check your IDE settings. This commit has replaced spaces with tabs for indentation. I've corrected this. Benedikt schrieb am Fr., 17. Juni 2016 um 19:41 Uhr: > Author: ggregory > Date: Fri Jun 17 17:41:52 2016 > New Revision: 1748880 > > URL:

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi. On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: Gilles, Thanks for links. I just read that (long-winded) thread and I see no consensus that "Commons project is not being interested in hosting those components". In line with what I wrote previously, there isn't any consensus on

[GitHub] commons-bcel pull request #3: Flushing DataOutputStream before calling toByt...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/3 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [BCEL] Test failures when building site

I was able to fix this problem by switching to JaCoCo. Can you confirm? Benedikt sebb schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 13:41 Uhr: > I get the same problem, but "mvn clen test" works OK. > > I think this is because of Cobertura - that messes with the class > files, and may

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: >> Gilles, >> >> Thanks for links. >> >> I just read that (long-winded) thread and I see no consensus that >> "Commons >> project is not being interested in hosting those components". > > In line with

Re: [BCEL] Test failures when building site

sebb schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 15:01 Uhr: > Yes, looks OK. > > So we can just remove any refs to cobertura or jacoco from pom.xml > and create the following empty file: > > src/site/resources/profile.jacoco > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1748990=rev ;-) > > > On

Re: svn commit: r1749014 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/pom.xml

schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 15:33 Uhr: > Author: britter > Date: Sat Jun 18 13:33:11 2016 > New Revision: 1749014 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749014=rev > Log: > Add Mark Roberts and Jérôme Leroux to the list of contributors > > Modified: >

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Could we start something in the sandbox? It's not modifying existing code. On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 8:43 AM Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > Gilles wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> Gilles, > >> > >> Thanks for links.

Re: [BCEL] Test failures when building site

Yes, looks OK. So we can just remove any refs to cobertura or jacoco from pom.xml and create the following empty file: src/site/resources/profile.jacoco On 18 June 2016 at 13:40, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I was able to fix this problem by switching to JaCoCo. Can you

Re: [BCEL] Test failures when building site

I get the same problem, but "mvn clen test" works OK. I think this is because of Cobertura - that messes with the class files, and may confuse BCEL. I tried mvn clean site -Dcobertura.skip and that reduces the number of failures, but there is still one: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Jun 18, 2016 9:28 AM, "Gilles" wrote: > > Hi. > > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:42:46 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> Hi Gilles, >> >> Gilles wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: Gilles, Thanks for

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:53:37 -0500, Matt Benson wrote: On Jun 18, 2016 9:28 AM, "Gilles" wrote: Hi. On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:42:46 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: Hi. On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: Gilles,

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles wrote: > ... > I'm asking, again, whether I need to initiate a VOTE that would allow me > to set up a workspace ("git", etc.) and transfer some code from CM over > there. > Nothing is stopping you from setting something up.

apache, commons, math

I am new to protocols here and not sure which thread to jump on. But I am quite interested in the viability of the math project and hope the following observation is helpful. I think one reason people are talking past each other in this debate is because those outside the commons-math community

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi. On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:42:46 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: Hi. On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:01:20 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: Gilles, Thanks for links. I just read that (long-winded) thread and I see no consensus that "Commons project is not being interested in hosting

Re: svn commit: r1749014 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/pom.xml

On 18 June 2016 at 14:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 15:33 Uhr: > >> Author: britter >> Date: Sat Jun 18 13:33:11 2016 >> New Revision: 1749014 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1749014=rev >> Log: >> Add Mark

Re: svn commit: r1749014 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/pom.xml

sebb schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 16:35 Uhr: > On 18 June 2016 at 14:34, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 15:33 Uhr: > > > >> Author: britter > >> Date: Sat Jun 18 13:33:11 2016 > >> New Revision: 1749014

Re: svn commit: r1748963 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/bcel/ElementValueGenTestCase.java

No problem! Gary Gregory schrieb am Sa., 18. Juni 2016 um 18:06: > I messed that up, sorry about that. > > Gary > -- Forwarded message -- > From: > Date: Jun 18, 2016 4:04 AM > Subject: svn commit: r1748963 - > >

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Compress-Windows #42

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Fwd: svn commit: r1748963 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/bcel/ElementValueGenTestCase.java

I messed that up, sorry about that. Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Jun 18, 2016 4:04 AM Subject: svn commit: r1748963 - /commons/proper/bcel/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/bcel/ElementValueGenTestCase.java To: Cc:

[VOTE] Release Compress 1.12 based on RC2

Hi all as promised I've cut a RC for Compress 1.12. The Release Candidate is available for review at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/ (svn revision 14040) Maven artifacts are here:

Jenkins build became unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #157

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: commons-jcs #157

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #158

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs #158

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC5

Hi, more then 10 years have passed since we've released BCEL 5.2. Users are waiting for us to release a new version capable of handling Java 6, 7 and 8 byte code. There have already been 4 release candidates for BCEL 6.0 but they have not made it for various reasons. Most importantly BC has been

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:00:34 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles wrote: ... I'm asking, again, whether I need to initiate a VOTE that would allow me to set up a workspace ("git", etc.) and transfer some code from CM over there.

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Jun 18, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gilles" wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:00:34 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> ... >>> I'm asking, again, whether I need to initiate a VOTE that would