On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 08:29, sebb wrote:
>
> Is null checked or unchecked?
>
> I think neither, so isUnchecked also needs to check for null.
>
> I wonder whether it might be better to throw NPE in both cases for null.
>
> It may be confusing for users if not checked != unchecked.
> e.g. it is
Is null checked or unchecked?
I think neither, so isUnchecked also needs to check for null.
I wonder whether it might be better to throw NPE in both cases for null.
It may be confusing for users if not checked != unchecked.
e.g. it is tempting to code:
if (isChecked(t)) {
} else { // must be
Le lun. 3 juil. 2023 à 09:41, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 08:29, sebb wrote:
> >
> > Is null checked or unchecked?
> >
> > I think neither, so isUnchecked also needs to check for null.
> >
> > I wonder whether it might be better to throw NPE in both cases for null.
> >
> >
yes. You are right. Closed
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 10:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le lun. 3 juil. 2023 à 09:41, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 at 08:29, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > Is null checked or unchecked?
> > >
> > > I think neither, so isUnchecked also needs to check
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 5:08 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:39 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > Great presentation in the video Elliotte. Thanks for sharing the link.
> >
>
> +1 many thanks.
>
> Now back to our hero. Let me pretend to be one of the people in the
> audience
Hi.
IIUC, the discussion sparked by that new code is currently
converging towards deletion:
https://markmail.org/message/nlqtk6na6nvwtelo
In any case, several arguments (confusing, unnecessary,
useless) were mentioned so that this commit be reverted.
A new thread should be started on the
Hi all,
This is a switch from the 2.12.0 vote mail thread in order to discuss 3.0
and 2.x releases.
I propose we switch master to 3.0 and create a branch called 2.x based and
an old commit and release 2.12.0 from there.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 6:41 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 5:08 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:39 AM Gary Gregory
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Great presentation in the video Elliotte. Thanks for sharing the link.
> > >
> >
> > +1 many thanks.
> >
> > Now
Hi Phil,
Starting a new mailing thread is a good idea at this point. I'll just
mention: I really do not want to roll back code changes in master. If you
want to pick a commit in the past and create a branch 2.x from that, it's
fine with me, or tell me, and I'll be happy to create the branch. Then
+1
Phil
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:41 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a switch from the 2.12.0 vote mail thread in order to discuss 3.0
> and 2.x releases.
>
> I propose we switch master to 3.0 and create a branch called 2.x based and
> an old commit and release 2.12.0 from there.
>
Hi Gary,
what's blocking the 2.0.0-M1 release? Can I help implementing it?
Best,
Dennis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
