Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:03, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I think it would be a nice-to-have feature for all active components, > allowing us to achieve parity with what used to happen with Jenkins (which > I never used and rarely pay attention to). When can then drop all Jenkins > build and free up

Re: [NUMBERS] GH deploy snapshot test

2023-12-20 Thread Alex Herbert
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 13:19, sebb wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:08, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > Thanks Sebb, > > > > Note that previously the GH action was running the default goal: > > 'clean verify javadoc:javadoc'. > > > > Since we now need to specify the 'deploy' goal as well the

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread Gary Gregory
Also FYI, over at Log4j, we (Volkan and Piotr are the drivers) have been creating releases from GitHub. I'm not sure we need to go this far here, but there might be tidbits there that may prove useful. Gary On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, 8:25 AM sebb wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:03, Gary Gregory

Re: [NUMBERS] GH deploy snapshot test

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:08, Alex Herbert wrote: > > Thanks Sebb, > > Note that previously the GH action was running the default goal: > 'clean verify javadoc:javadoc'. > > Since we now need to specify the 'deploy' goal as well the above > defaults can be switched in for your additions when

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
Numbers is now deploying OK, as does Crypto. Jira issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25299 On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 13:56, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Also FYI, over at Log4j, we (Volkan and Piotr are the drivers) have been > creating releases from GitHub. I'm not sure we

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Gary, On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 14:57, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Also FYI, over at Log4j, we (Volkan and Piotr are the drivers) have been > creating releases from GitHub. I'm not sure we need to go this far here, > but there might be tidbits there that may prove useful. Thanks for mentioning it.

[TESTING] What is the status of this component?

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
There is a repo at https://github.com/apache/commons-testing, but almost no actual code changes. The component does not appear in the sandbox, dormant or proper categories, and I could find no website for it. Seems to me the repo should at least be flagged as dormant or sandbox. Sebb

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread Alex Herbert
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 17:15, sebb wrote: > > Numbers is now deploying OK, as does Crypto. I cannot see anything in the GH action config that specifies that deploy should be only on the master/main branch in the original Apache repo. How is the deploy goal handled in forked repos and

Re: [NUMBERS] GH deploy snapshot test

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 16:16, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 13:19, sebb wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:08, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Sebb, > > > > > > Note that previously the GH action was running the default goal: > > > 'clean verify javadoc:javadoc'. >

Re: [TESTING] What is the status of this component?

2023-12-20 Thread Gary Gregory
I had intended to gather various reusable JUnit rules and utilities but never got around to finishing off a first release. Since then JUnit 5 has been released. There is long term value there IMO especially with all that JUnit 5 has broken in compatibility but I've not taken the time to pursue it.

Re: [TESTING] What is the status of this component?

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I had intended to gather various reusable JUnit rules and utilities but > never got around to finishing off a first release. Since then JUnit 5 has > been released. There is long term value there IMO especially with all that > JUnit 5 has

RE: Re: [TESTING] What is the status of this component?

2023-12-20 Thread Rob Spoor
It's also worth checking what alternatives already offer. For instance, https://junit-pioneer.org/ has @DefaultLocale which would make DefaultLocaleTestRule obsolete. Rob On 2023/12/20 18:18:25 Gary Gregory wrote: I had intended to gather various reusable JUnit rules and utilities but never