The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/
Maven artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/maven/
Site:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last time I'll pick that route.
For what its worth, for math 2.2 I used a mix of Phil scripts for the
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
...
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it
is completely safe. I
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last time I'll pick that route.
For what its
+1
Two comments:
- At the site top left javadocs for 1.5.6 are not linked
- groupId is commons-pool. Shouldn't it change to org.apache or
something? Guess that one is for later
I have not checked sigs
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
The tag is here:
On 3/30/11 12:02 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
...
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple
Le 30/03/2011 09:07, Ralph Goers a écrit :
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:21:04AM +0100, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:15, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
preferred way to support people plugging in alternative
implementations because they have
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Jorg.
From comments that were posted to the other thread, I gather the main
trend that, because some interfaces needed an upgrade, the interface
design tool is becoming evil. Did I get this right?
I guess that you refer to RandomData and RandomDataImpl. This is
indeed the
On 30 March 2011 06:30, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:13, pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
New Revision: 1086810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810view=rev
Log:
Upgraded
Le 30/03/2011 13:33, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:21:04AM +0100, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:15, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
We have been talking about moving away from interfaces as the
preferred way to support people plugging in
On 30 March 2011 08:07, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that should be avoided unless the API is also being changed in
an incompatible way, and then only if it really is impossible to
maintain backwards compatibility.
I think there are excellent reasons to change the API in
On 3/30/11 5:39 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 08:01, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance from:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
It's the last
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:04, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 5:39 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 08:01, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a �crit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and
I think that you reason on the basic assumption that CM is close to
stability. Many problems (some bugs but also design consistency) have shown
that it is not. So, my opinion is that users will prefer a product that
continues to improve rather than something that is backward-compatible. I'm
one
On 30 March 2011 16:19, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that should be avoided unless the API is also being changed in
an incompatible way, and then only if it really is impossible to
maintain backwards
We are mixing two things in this thread - how much we care about
backward compatibility and how and when to use interfaces.
I think we need to settle both topics. I have stated my view, which
is really just to standard Commons policy, on the backward
compatibility issue. Based on many years
On 30 March 2011 17:03, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 5:39 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 08:01, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I followed the whole song and dance
On Mar 30, 2011, at 13:24, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2011 17:03, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 5:39 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 08:01, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm
On 3/30/11 10:24 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 17:03, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 5:39 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 08:01, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
I
Hi Gilles,
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi Jorg.
From comments that were posted to the other thread, I gather the main
trend that, because some interfaces needed an upgrade, the interface
design tool is becoming evil. Did I get this right?
I guess that you refer to RandomData and
On 30/03/2011 18:43, Phil Steitz wrote:
I get that, which is why I think some kind of middle ground where we
provide simple scripts to move stuff around on the ASF hosts might
be a good compromise. This is essentially what the ibiblio-rysnch
stuff does. The only manual missing piece is
On 30 March 2011 19:23, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 30/03/2011 18:43, Phil Steitz wrote:
I get that, which is why I think some kind of middle ground where we
provide simple scripts to move stuff around on the ASF hosts might
be a good compromise. This is essentially what the
On 30/03/2011 07:17, Phil Steitz wrote:
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/
MD5/SHA1s match for source distributions.
OpenPGP signatures valid and key
On 30 March 2011 21:37, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 1:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 30/03/2011 07:17, Phil Steitz wrote:
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars are here:
On 30 March 2011 06:30, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:13, pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
New Revision: 1086810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810view=rev
Log:
Upgraded
Commons Codec 1.5 was promoted from Nexus on 29 March 2011 06:21
and is showing up here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/commons-codec/commons-codec/1.5/
However it has yet to show up in Maven Central over 24 hours later.
Hi all guys,
I recently needed the Discovery in a project of mine and noticed we
haven't had releases since 2008. I would like to update it, improving
a little the design - like, for example, using the generics.
Any objection? Thanks in advance, have a nice day,
Simo
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
There is this cool command called cp that works very well. There
is another one called tar and even one called scp ;) If the
problem is that we want to be more paranoid than we are with the
mirrors for the maven
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
But does the API have to change, or could these additional features be
supported by adding new methods and classes?
Not necessarily. But my point is that codec is in a state where
breaking the API will make work just easier. So why
On 31 March 2011 00:17, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
But does the API have to change, or could these additional features be
supported by adding new methods and classes?
Not necessarily. But my point is that
On 31 March 2011 00:22, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
makes it *harder* IMO
On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:13, pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
New Revision: 1086810
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086810view=rev
Log:
On 31 March 2011 02:00, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/11 6:30 PM, sebb wrote:
On 30 March 2011 01:13, pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:13:51 2011
New Revision:
On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF
I'm seeing a lot of complaining on these threads but no actual proposal. If the
proposal is to move away from Maven/Nexus for a release for all of commons I'll
vote -1. OTOH, If some release managers want to do the release some other way
I'm not going to force them to use Maven/Nexus.
Ralph
On 3/30/11 6:57 PM, sebb wrote:
On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
zips/tars that go
On 3/30/11 7:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of complaining on these threads but no actual proposal.
I started the thread with a proposal, which was to standardize on
the process documented on the web site. I know you don't like that
process and I am not going to insist that we force
On 3/29/11 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_6_RC2
The distribution zips/tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.6-rc2/
Maven artifacts are here:
44 matches
Mail list logo
