On 25 February 2012 09:59, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hello.
How do we proceed from here in order to release 3.0? Cf. ticket MATH-746,
Things to do before releasing 3.0.
Sorry for being late on this.
Can we start to talk about an expected release date?
I
good!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
2012/2/25 c...@apache.org:
Author: cs
Date: Sat Feb 25 09:52:29 2012
New Revision: 1293564
URL:
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Fixed a typo in RC1 which caused compile failure in case there
were no sys/capability.h header on the system.
The new set of artefacts [1] and site [2] are at usual place
based on tag [3]
Please vote (vote will remain open for at least 72 hours).
Apache
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 00:47, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Sat Feb 25 00:47:00 2012
New Revision: 1293496
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293496view=rev
Log:
Update plugins.
Modified:
On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 00:47, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Sat Feb 25 00:47:00 2012
New Revision: 1293496
URL:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:19 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:05, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, in trunk, we have:
DescriptionResourcePathLocationType
The method getInstance(Locale) is undefined for the type
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
Gary,
In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
vetoes (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto):
A
Hi,
for some reason this discussion ended without a result. Maybe it is time
to summarize what has been discussed so far.
This all goes back to a commit by Gary, that fixed several check style
issues in VFS [1]. The following discussion between Gary and Ralph and
others [2] showed, that
Hi all,
Le 23/02/2012 16:45, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1245061view=rev
Log:
Removed unneeded clone.
The clone did not protect the array used, only the reference
ones. JIRA: MATH-650
-1
That was the whole point of the clone -
Hi all. I've a little doubt on DFS algorithm implemented in the
DefaultVisitAlgorithmsSelector.
I think that the visit doesn't serch in depth but in a breadth way.
here is a little code snippet:
[ ... ]
while ( visitingGraph !vertexStack.isEmpty() )
{
V v =
Hi Marco,
IIRC the vertex order should be guarded by the vertexStack - maybe it
is just the handler be called in the wrong way.
Do you have/can you provide please testcases?
TIA,
-SImo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:15 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 February 2012 17:00, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/24/2012 04:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
I downloaded
The code shouldn't visit each of the connected nodes during the
iteration. It should only visit the popped node and then add all
un-visited, connected nodes to the stack. Hopefully we've implemented
this so that all we have to do to switch from dfs to bfs is to swap
out the collection used. If
On 25 February 2012 14:46, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012
On Feb 25, 2012, at 19:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:46, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM,
On 26 February 2012 01:14, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 2012, at 19:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:46, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi,
I know that CM3 should be in a frozen state now, but while working
with FieldElement this morning, I've noticed that the contract of
divide(T) states that an ArithmeticException *should* be thrown if the
parameter is zero. However, for this boundary case
- BigFraction.divide(BigFraction)
24 matches
Mail list logo
