[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons Collections - Group (shared) Maven 2 Build Definition (Java 1.5)

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=24311projectId=71 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Sun 29 Jul 2012 11:39:40 + Finished at: Sun 29 Jul 2012 11:41:01 + Total time: 1m 21s Build Trigger: Schedule

[configuration] Checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in DynamicCombinedConfiguration

There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method DynamicCombinedConfiguration.getCurrentConfig(). Indeed, the double-check locking idiom is used, however, there is a comment saying that this safe due to the usage of a ConcurrentMap. This may be true, but I wonder whether

Re: [configuration] Checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in DynamicCombinedConfiguration

I used that specifically to avoid creating multiple combined configurations since it can be fairly expensive to create them. I looked into the guarantees that ConcurrentMap provides before I implemented that and included the comment since I knew it would catch someone's eye. Ralph On Jul

Re: [Math] Little thought about multi-threading

[...] Well, you probably don't want to switch to Java 7 now, [...] Oh, yes, please! 8-P I would be in favor of this too, but we could also target it for the 4.0 release together with the parallelization stuff. Thomas I would also be in favor of Java 7, but I understand that

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Math] Little thought about multi-threading

Hi, 2012/7/30 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: [...] Well, you probably don't want to switch to Java 7 now, [...] Oh, yes, please! 8-P I would be in favor of this too, but we could also target it for the 4.0 release together with the parallelization stuff. Thomas

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This