Re: [Math] FixedElapsedTime in genetic algorithm (Was: svn commit: r1409352 - ...)

2012-11-15 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/15/2012 02:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:38:47PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 11/14/12 4:05 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -, t...@apache.org wrote: Author: tn Date: Wed Nov 14 20:09:51 2012 New Revision: 1409352

Re: svn commit: r1409352 - /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math3/genetics/FixedElapsedTimeTest.java

2012-11-15 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/15/2012 01:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -, t...@apache.org wrote: Author: tn Date: Wed Nov 14 20:09:51 2012 New Revision: 1409352 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1409352view=rev Log: Reduce sleep time in unit test to prevent

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Math] FixedElapsedTime in genetic algorithm (Was: svn commit: r1409352 - ...)

2012-11-15 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/15/2012 09:08 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 11/15/2012 02:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:38:47PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 11/14/12 4:05 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -, t...@apache.org wrote: Author: tn Date: Wed

Re: [Math] FixedElapsedTime in genetic algorithm (Was: svn commit: r1409352 - ...)

2012-11-15 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/15/2012 09:55 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 11/15/2012 09:08 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 11/15/2012 02:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:38:47PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote: On 11/14/12 4:05 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Patrick. On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:38:07PM -0500, Patrick Meyer wrote: Please keep ResizeableDoubleArray as its own class. I find it very useful for more than descriptive statistics. I do like the idea of adding an apply method to it. Could you please have a look at the JIRA page:

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This

RE: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Patrick Meyer
Hi Gilles, These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is really nice. Looking more closely at my code, I am using the getElements method. As long as that remains available, it make sense to deprecate the getInternalValues method. My use of ResizeableDoubleArray is

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is really nice. Oh, I should have asked whether you can also look at the source code in the trunk: Currently the compute(UnivariateStatistic) method is only implemented internally (in a private inner class of

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/15/12 5:40 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is really nice. Oh, I should have asked whether you can also look at the source code in the trunk: Currently the compute(UnivariateStatistic) method is only implemented

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Ted Dunning
The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view methods can be composed with a small number of compute/aggregate methods to get the expressive power of what would otherwise require a vast array

Re: [all] moving to svnpubsub or CMS?

2012-11-15 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: This is a false dichotomy. Maven site generation can work with ASF CMS if desired. That is sort of true but doesn't really apply to commons. I created the Flume site using Maven and Maven generates the site from RST

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view methods can be composed with

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/15/12 9:22 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide some sample code? You don't. See my next paragraph. See the assign method in this class:

Re: [all] moving to svnpubsub or CMS?

2012-11-15 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote: On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2012/11/14 Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org: On 14.11.2012 08:40, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Please,

RE: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Patrick Meyer
I misunderstood an earlier email and I though the compute method was public. It seems that adding a public compute method may be more complication and effort than it is worth. My apologies for the misunderstanding. The compute method would only be of value if it can be an easy addition.

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide some sample code? You

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/15/12 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Ted Dunning
Yes. Sounds similar. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: The assign methods are inherited. The signatures are like assign(DoubleFunction), assign(DoubleDoubleFunction, Matrix other) and so on. OK, assign looks like what I was calling evaluate and

Re: [Math] MATH-894

2012-11-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/15/12 10:52 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote: I misunderstood an earlier email and I though the compute method was public. It seems that adding a public compute method may be more complication and effort than it is worth. My apologies for the misunderstanding. The compute method would only be

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-11-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This