[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2013-01-09, Gump wrote: Tests in error: initializationError(org.apache.commons.mail.MultiPartEmailTest): For input string: 12-SNAPSHOT getting closer. When you build JUnit from github's master the version

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [parent] new release?

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/8 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/1/8 Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com: On 1/7/13 3:57 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2013 16:06, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Is CP in a proper state for a release WRT svn pub? Dunno. Given that a faulty CP version can just be

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-09 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: +1. I suspect we'll need another RC to deal with pub/svn when you actually try to do the release because the usual place we put sites is now supposed to be read-only. my own +1. My understanding was that the old

ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi Folks, I have started importing some content for sub projects (exec, collections). I will try to do more later. Where is the place to document that ? Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). What is the status

Re: [VOTE] Release of Commons Email 1.3 based on RC7

2013-01-09 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2013 10:03, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: +1. I suspect we'll need another RC to deal with pub/svn when you actually try to do the release because the usual place we put sites is now

Re: svn commit: r1430758 - /commons/proper/collections/trunk/pom.xml

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
This usually breaks CI builds... Gary On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:06, ol...@apache.org ol...@apache.org wrote: Author: olamy Date: Wed Jan 9 10:05:36 2013 New Revision: 1430758 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1430758view=rev Log: fix checkout path Modified:

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a component. Looking at code coverage helps establish or shake my confidence in a component. It should definitively be part of ones development checklist, I like to have the best code coverage for any new code that I check in.

Re: svn commit: r1430097 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/zip: ZipEightByteInteger.java ZipLong.java ZipShort.java

2013-01-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2013-01-09, Julius Davies wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: can you please record the changes in src/chanhes/changes.xml as well - and add yourself as developer to the POM if you feel like it? Thanks for the tip. Done! Great, thanks

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:25:45AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a component. Looking at code coverage helps establish or shake my confidence in a component. It should definitively be part of ones development checklist, I like to

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:25:45AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a component. Looking at code coverage helps establish or shake my confidence in a component. It should

Re: svn commit: r1430758 - /commons/proper/collections/trunk/pom.xml

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: This usually breaks CI builds... as long as parent is installed locally it doesn't break looks good here: http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=16 Gary On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:06, ol...@apache.org

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:25:45AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a component. Looking at code coverage helps establish or shake my

Re: svn commit: r1430758 - /commons/proper/collections/trunk/pom.xml

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
That's lucky. It was just yesterday that I reverted using a snapshot parent because it broke Jenkins IIRC. Why we have so many different CIs is a different issue (Gump, Jenkins, Continuum), bleh. Gary On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2013/1/9 Gary Gregory

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:25:45AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a component. Looking at code

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. [...] Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated profile in parent pom ? Can I move it to a reporting profile in parent pom ? For

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:37:33AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:25:45AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: IMO code coverage should be part of the standard documentation for a

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: Hi. [...] Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated profile in parent pom ? Can I move

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
What about having a reporting profile (enabled per default). And using -DskipReports to not generated cobertura, findbugs etc.. Perso I like this idea as currently when you want to test a typo fix in a .apt or .xdoc it's very long to generate the site only for a typo fix in documentation.

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/9/13 7:14 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: What about having a reporting profile (enabled per default). And using -DskipReports to not generated cobertura, findbugs etc.. Perso I like this idea as currently when you want to test a typo fix in a .apt or .xdoc it's very long to generate the site

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: Hi. [...] Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I think about cobertura for modules which use sonar). What is the status about moving cobertura to a dedicated

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com: On 1/9/13 7:14 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: What about having a reporting profile (enabled per default). And using -DskipReports to not generated cobertura, findbugs etc.. Perso I like this idea as currently when you want to test a typo fix in a .apt or

Re: [parent] new release?

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2013/1/8 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/1/8 Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com: On 1/7/13 3:57 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2013 16:06, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Is CP in a proper state for a

Re: [parent] new release?

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: 2013/1/8 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/1/8 Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com: On 1/7/13 3:57 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 January 2013 16:06, Gary Gregory

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote: 2013/1/9 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: Hi. [...] Note: currently some content is imported which could be removed (I think about cobertura for modules which use

Re: ETA SvnPubSub site migration

2013-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:46:43PM +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote: 2013/1/9 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: 2013/1/9 Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org: Hi. [...] Note: currently some content is imported which could be

[VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.1.1

2013-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Please have a look at the release candidate (RC1) for Commons Math 3.1.1, and vote. -- Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1_1_RC1/ Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.1.1/RC1/ Binaries:

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.1.1

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
Did infra come through for the site and dist side? Gary On Jan 9, 2013, at 17:18, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: Hello. Please have a look at the release candidate (RC1) for Commons Math 3.1.1, and vote. -- Tag:

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.1.1

2013-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:52:22PM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: Did infra come through for the site and dist side? ? From Sebb's and Phil's mails, I understood that we could still do it the old way. Gilles Gary On Jan 9, 2013, at 17:18, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.1.1

2013-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jan 9, 2013, at 18:04, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:52:22PM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote: Did infra come through for the site and dist side? ? From Sebb's and Phil's mails, I understood that we could still do it the old way. Ah, ok. G

Re: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.1.1

2013-01-09 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
+1 (non binding), everything built fine in my linux box (Linux chuva 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.32-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux, jdk 1.7 oracle, apache maven 3.0.4) In NOTICE.txt, the copyright is 2011-2012, but I believe that's not a blocker and maybe could be fixed in a next release. Hope that

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2013-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This