Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 22 June 2013 19:42, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Am 22.06.2013 19:10, schrieb Gary Gregory: On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: I'm for whatever does the

Why is Commons different from Tomcat? (was [ALL] Strategy for developer tools)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 22 June 2013 15:26, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If that means maven plugins, so be it. This is written as someone who has never released a commons component and is very

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 22 June 2013 17:41, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: snip I don't have answers neither do I have the Maven knowledge I suspect is necessary to figure the answers out. I encourage those that do have the

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: On 22 June 2013 12:50, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote: 2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de [snip] Bad. At least to me. Especially since we always claim that we actually release the source and not necessarily the binaries. So every user that downloads our

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: [snip] But we still need to resolve: - where in SVN these tools belong - how to ensure the tools are readily available to RMs Well, don't we have the possibility to publish these plugins somewhere on the web site? All that Maven actually needs is a structure that looks like a

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: sebb wrote: [snip] But we still need to resolve: - where in SVN these tools belong - how to ensure the tools are readily available to RMs Well, don't we have the possibility to publish these plugins somewhere on the web

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: sebb wrote: [snip] But we still need to resolve: - where in SVN these tools belong Let's just create a new top level folder under http://svn.apache.org/asf/commons.

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com wrote: Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: sebb wrote: [snip] But we still need to resolve: - where in SVN these tools belong Let's just

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread Mark Thomas
On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote: On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com wrote: Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: sebb wrote: [snip] But we still need to resolve: - where in SVN

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 23 June 2013 20:35, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote: On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com wrote: Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: sebb wrote:

[VOTE] Release of Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2013-06-23 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1 based on RC1. The files: The artifacts are deployed to Nexus: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-060/org/apache/commons/commons-collections4/4.0-alpha1/ Distribution files:

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: On 23 June 2013 20:35, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote: On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com wrote: Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb seb...@gmail.com: On 23 June 2013 16:10, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013-06-23 Thread sebb
On 23 June 2013 21:02, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: sebb wrote: On 23 June 2013 20:35, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: On 23/06/2013 20:28, sebb wrote: On 23 June 2013 19:56, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com wrote: Am 23.06.2013 um 20:16 schrieb sebb seb...@gmail.com:

Re: [math] new feature to allow infinite limits in numerical integration.

2013-06-23 Thread Gilles
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 22:36:04 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote: I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow users to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds. Cheers, Ajo Fod. Thanks for bringing the discussion to the dev

Re: [CSV] remaining issues before 1.0

2013-06-23 Thread Gary Gregory
I've done a bit of fiddling with the code and JIRA. It seems the biggest issue is the builder API. Then there are remaining issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CSV%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%29%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20ASC If