Robert, send an email to
dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
*http://tinyurl.com/njw7snw
*
On 10/26/2013 01:08 AM, Robert Hood wrote:
please remove me from the list
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Thomas Neidhart t...@apache.org wrote:
Hello.
The Apache Commons team is pleased to
I've tried to commit the apidocs from the tar.gz yesterday, but it took
forever, so I aborted. I'll give it a second try now.
2013/10/25 Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
wrote:
2013/10/25 Gary Gregory
Hi Hen,
2013/10/26 bay...@apache.org
Author: bayard
Date: Sat Oct 26 02:14:35 2013
New Revision: 1535911
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1535911
Log:
Applying github pull request https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/5,
linked as LANG-928, fixing a bug in OctalEscaper trying to parse
Hi,
I recently came across Google Guice 4.0 Beta. They is a tool called JDiff
[1] to visualize API changes [2]. To me this report is much easier to
understand than the Clirr report. This is for the fact that it visualizes
the changes in an JavaDoc like format. When I think about an API, I always
On 26 October 2013 10:07, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I recently came across Google Guice 4.0 Beta. They is a tool called JDiff
[1] to visualize API changes [2]. To me this report is much easier to
understand than the Clirr report. This is for the fact that it visualizes
On 2013-10-26, sebb wrote:
On 26 October 2013 06:30, bode...@apache.org wrote:
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
artifactIdmaven-scm-publish-plugin/artifactId
configuration
ignorePathsToDelete
If I had to pick between JDiff and Clirr, I'd pick Clirr. Not to say there
is no value in JDiff, there is, but Clirr serves our purpose better IMO,
because Clirr tells me when I've broken compatibility. I see the value in
JDiff in organizing the information in a different way. I could see that
Thanks for all the work. I'm excited to finally incorporate the
changes into some of my professional work.
I just took a peek at the website and there is an advertisement for
ApacheCon NA 2013. Perhaps its time to drop the mention? :)
Thanks.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Stefan Bodewig
I recently wrote JavaDocs for a class I was adding to Commons Math and I
tried to adhere to this requirement:
External references or full statements of definitions for all
mathematical terms used in component documentation must be provided.
I wanted to make my documentation appear consistent
Hello.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 20:02:14 -0400, Matt Adereth wrote:
I recently wrote JavaDocs for a class I was adding to Commons Math
and I
tried to adhere to this requirement:
External references or full statements of definitions for all
mathematical terms used in component documentation must
Hi Benedikt,
Did you have any luck with this? Next week I will have some spare time, maybe I
can try to help on this.
Cheers
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com
From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
To: Commons Developers
Done! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6940
Cheers
Bruno P. Kinoshita
http://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com
- Original Message -
From: Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 5:17 PM
an
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jörg Schaible
joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Hi Damjan,
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for explanation.
We would be able
13 matches
Mail list logo
