Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

Does this use Java 8? On Monday, 27 June 2016 2:20 AM, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:13:06 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote: On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: One could argue that

[DISCUSS] "Fraction" also in Commons Lang (Was: [VOTE] New component: Rational numbers)

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:09:37 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: +1 I would call it org.apache.commons.fractions (non-mathematicians know "fractions" more than "rationals", e.g. useful for those dealing with ancient imperial measurements that occasionally crash Mars probes). I think this is a

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

> On Jun 26, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Gilles wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:35:38 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory >>> wrote: >>> One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons

Re: Fwd: Code Quality Improvements for commons-dbutils

I got an email from one of them for an ops4j project, and they followed through with several pull requests. However, what they're doing almost seems like clicking the "Code Cleanup..." menu item in IntelliJ, but I could be oversimplifying what they're doing. On 26 June 2016 at 12:57, Benedikt

Re: Fwd: Code Quality Improvements for commons-dbutils

So you don't think WE should expect a reaction from them? :-) Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am So., 26. Juni 2016 um 19:12: > I've received several such emails from DevFactory, and they all look > exactly the same except the name of the sender.. > > On 26 Jun 2016 3:20 p.m.,

Re: Fwd: Code Quality Improvements for commons-dbutils

I've received several such emails from DevFactory, and they all look exactly the same except the name of the sender.. On 26 Jun 2016 3:20 p.m., "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: Hello Ayman, awesome that DevFactory has decided to invest in Open Source projects! We're always looking

[ALL] analysis.apache.org not updated anymore - who has karma?

Hi, I've just realized that our projects at analysis.apache.org are not updated anymore. They used to be updated by the continuum build, which has been deactivated by INFRA a while ago. Who has the karma to fix this? If you can grant me the necessary karma, I can have a look. Regards, Benedikt

[GitHub] commons-io pull request #13: Cleaning directories after each test run, to pr...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/13 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Fwd: Code Quality Improvements for commons-dbutils

Hello Ayman, awesome that DevFactory has decided to invest in Open Source projects! We're always looking for people who want to work on Apache Commons Components and collaborate. We welcome any contributions to our components however there are some rules: - all communication about development

Re: [VOTE] New component: Standard math functions

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > One could argue that since Java has java.util.Random, Commons Lang could > include a random package. For the same reason, [io] might be moved to [lang], too. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the