On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:03:58 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
I do not think reverting is right since the previous is obviously
bogus, to
me, that is. Throwing a RE is never useful, again IMO. We should just
evolve the code from here.
Would you like to outline choices?
1) NSEE
2) Custom
3) ISE
4) ?
GitHub user Xaerxess opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/19
COLLECTIONS-575: Add synchronized queue wrapper
Added `QueueUtils#synchronizedQueue(Queue)` wrapper and `SynchronizedQueue`
with tests. Please check if I used proper conventions as
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 5:59 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I am against spinning out org.apache.commons.math4.complex out into yet
> another component. The argument that Gilles refuses to
> support org.apache.commons.math4.complex because he does not want to
> support all of
I do not think reverting is right since the previous is obviously bogus, to
me, that is. Throwing a RE is never useful, again IMO. We should just
evolve the code from here.
Would you like to outline choices?
1) NSEE
2) Custom
3) ISE
4) ?
Gary (will be offline most of today)
On Oct 28, 2016
Hello,
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mi., 26. Okt. 2016 um
21:38 Uhr:
> Hello,
>
> schrieb am Di., 25. Okt. 2016 um 22:59 Uhr:
>
> Repository: commons-csv
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master b2a50d4a3 -> 1c7a9910b
>
>
> [CSV-201] Do not use