[OT] Slack channel created

Hi All and FYI, I created a Slack channel called #commons for the team the-asf.slack.com Gary

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #54: TEXT-93: RandomStringGenerator accepts a list...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/54 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: Commons sub project for parallel method execution

Hi All, I found some time recently to work on the suggestions and ideas that came up while discussing this. Specifically, I reworked two major points that were called out - 1. Removed usage of Reflection API. Replaced reflection with MethodHandles introduced in Java 7 which provide typed,

Re: Things in a POM file that are not probably incorrect

It seems so, although it sounds like there is a solution to do it with Java 7 and 8 as well. http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Java9%20and%20the%20impact%20on%20Maven%20projects.pdf

Re: Things in a POM file that are not probably incorrect

It sounds like building on Java 9 renders the animal sniffer Maven plugin obsolete. Gary On Jun 26, 2017 15:02, "Simon Spero" wrote: > 1.5 > 1.5 > org.apache.commons.functor > > JDK 9 cannot generate or parse class files compiled with -target 1.5 [1]. > > Per

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

I am OK with keeping the lazy vote since it is pretty frictionless, and gives people the opportunity to officially raise their hand and show why this is a problem for them. In practice though, moving everything to Git is just a matter of time. I can imagine that we would just move components to

Re: Things in a POM file that are not probably incorrect

Java 9 can still run old bytecode, but they're removing compiler support for outputting that bytecode apparently (either that or syntax support). On 27 June 2017 at 18:45, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 27/06/2017 à 00:02, Simon Spero a écrit : > > > JDK 9 cannot generate or

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

The only objection I've seen to switching on any project so far was other projects using svn:external to sync up a commons project, but there are workarounds for that (e.g., the GitHub svn mirror). On 28 June 2017 at 03:45, Amey Jadiye wrote: > unless there is strong

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

unless there is strong reason to stick with svn we should move on git(as many other already moved). I agree that in few cases svn is preferred and that may open huge discussion but atleast for Commons I don't see much advantages to use svn. people who are using svn from long time usually comes in

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

On 2017-06-28, Amey Jadiye wrote: > I think just announcing with intention is enough as git is always better > than svn and at some point everyone will wish to move on git. There certainly are people who disagree with your (I'm not one of them) ;-) Stefan

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

On 2017-06-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > do we still need a vote for moving components to git? We have done > this so often that I think we could change the process to a simply > mail announcing intents to move a component. Hmm, what if one of the active developers of the component then says

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

I think just announcing with intention is enough as git is always better than svn and at some point everyone will wish to move on git. so +1 to just announce it. Regards, Amey On Wed, Jun 28, 2017, 12:51 PM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > do we still need a vote for

[DISCUSS] Do we need a vote for moving components to git?

Hi, do we still need a vote for moving components to git? We have done this so often that I think we could change the process to a simply mail announcing intents to move a component. Thoughts? Benedikt - To unsubscribe,

Re: Git/Github Access

Hi Carl, > Am 28.06.2017 um 05:48 schrieb Carl Hall : > > Hi friends, > > I'd like to move commons-dbutils to git rather than continuing to deal with > git-svn. Could someone point me in the right direction for requesting this > or point me to the right person/group to

[Commons Wiki] Update of "MovingToGit" by BenediktRitter

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "MovingToGit" page has been changed by BenediktRitter: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingToGit?action=diff=7=8 Comment: Add requirement to start a vote before migration