[GitHub] commons-imaging issue #27: Increase code coverage one

Github user TheRealHaui commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 @garydgregory Thanks for your response. Looked over the secretary@ section ... Referring to your question if some of the tests were generated: I use a lot of tools on

[GitHub] commons-imaging issue #27: Increase code coverage one

Github user garydgregory commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 Please see https://www.apache.org/licenses/#submitting --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] commons-imaging issue #27: Increase code coverage one

Github user TheRealHaui commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 @garydgregory You're welcome. Where to send the pdf to? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

Re: [dbutils] Preparing for Release; Questions

Maven setup! I dug through the pom parent chain to get the right server id (apache.releases.https) and get my creds setup correctly. I was able to complete the deploy step, and am now working through the final steps. Regarding syncing, nothing has changed. I think Benedikt may be right about

[GitHub] commons-imaging issue #27: Increase code coverage one

Github user garydgregory commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 @TheRealHaui: Thank you for your PR. This is a lot of code, I think it would be appropriate for you to file a ICLA with us. Please see

Re: [daemon] moving to git ? and bump java version.

It seems OK to me to update to Java 6 for now and get this to compile under java 9 for those folks who will try... Gary On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > Thanks for great insights Mark. > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017, 9:28 PM Mark Thomas

[GitHub] commons-imaging issue #27: Increase code coverage one

Github user garydgregory commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 Where some of these generated? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] commons-text issue #49: TEXT-89: WordUtils.initials support for UTF-16 surro...

Github user arunvinudss commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/49 @ameyjadiye Done. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] commons-text issue #49: TEXT-89: WordUtils.initials support for UTF-16 surro...

Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/49 [](https://coveralls.io/builds/12387036) Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 97.126% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-imaging pull request #27: Increase code coverage one

GitHub user TheRealHaui opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-imaging/pull/27 Increase code coverage one I have created Unit Tests to increase code coverage which I want to contribute. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

RE: [lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

I just ran into this the other day. Was going to switch to the commons-text version, but it was to much trouble and decided to stick with the deprecated version in Commons-lang  Original message From: Pascal Schumacher Date: 7/13/17 4:02 PM

Re: [lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

Can one be pitch for entry level and the other for advanced use cases? If so, just un-deprecate but still Javadoc to [text] the user's edification. Gary On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hello everybody, > > with 3.5 we deprecated

[lang] - Remove RandomStringUtils deprecation / move it to [text]?

Hello everybody, with 3.5 we deprecated RandomStringUtils in favor of RandomStringGenerator in commons-text. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-96 complains that "RandomStringGenerator is extremely verbose compared to the deprecated commons.lang3 RandomStringUtils." From my

Re: [daemon] : fixing some general stuff

Reviewed. Gary On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > If maintainers are not around, can someone please review this ? > > Regards, > Amey > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Amey Jadiye > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Its was quite

Re: [daemon] : fixing some general stuff

If maintainers are not around, can someone please review this ? Regards, Amey On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > Hi All, > > Its was quite tedious task but I have fixed almost all errors from the > commons daemon from maven perspective and below