Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC1

blocking for the release? Oliver > > Gary > > * > > Files with unapproved licenses: > > src/test/resources/test.json > src/test/resources/test.yaml > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 2:38 PM Oliver Heger &g

[RELEASE PLUGIN] Questions

Hi, for the 2.3 release of [configuration] I am trying out the cool release plugin. Everything works fine, but I get a build failure when it adds the site to SVN (see below). Do I have to prepare something in the dist area before this can be done? And another question: How can I generate such a

Re: [RELEASE PLUGIN] Questions

> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 9:21 AM Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> for the 2.3 release of [configuration] I am trying out the cool release >> plugin. >> >> Everything works fine, but I get a build failure when it adds the site >> to SVN (

Re: commons-dbcp git commit: [DBCP-517] Make defensive copies of char[] passwords.

[lang]. I would not want to depend on [collections] just to use one or two copy methods. And the utility class could support non-collection types (mainly arrays) as well. Oliver > > Gary > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 14:00 Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> +1, Thank you. >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC1

Am 31.07.2018 um 04:21 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:29 PM Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> Hi Gary, >> >> Am 30.07.2018 um 16:25 schrieb Gary Gregory: >>> -1 >>> >>> :-( RAT check fails: >>> - Unzip src zip

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC2

We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since Apache Commons Configuration 2.2 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3. Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 RC2 is available for review here:

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC1

This vote is cancelled because of problems with the RAT report. Thanks for all reviews. Oliver Am 28.07.2018 um 22:38 schrieb Oliver Heger: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Configuration 2.2 was released, so I woul

Re: svn commit: r1836755 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/pom.xml

Am 26.07.2018 um 22:30 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Hi Oliver, > > Once you've released [configuration], I expect you will bring the component > back to Java 8, right? Yes, this is the plan. Oliver > > Gary > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:39 PM wrote: > >> Author: oheger >> Date: Thu Jul 26

Re: commons-dbcp git commit: [DBCP-517] Make defensive copies of char[] passwords.

+1, Thank you. I had planned to create a patch for this issue, but did not find the time so far. BTW, I have quite often the need to create defensive copies of arrays or collections in some variants (e.g. null safe, with wrapping to an unmodifiable collection, etc.). Could this be an addition to

[configuration] Release with Java 7 compatibility

Hi, the current codebase for [configuration] has been updated to require Java 8. However, no Java 8 feature is used so far. I would therefore like to go back to Java 7 and get a release out. Afterwards we can switch to Java 8. Thoughts? Oliver

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC2

The vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC2 passed with the following votes (all are binding): Gary Gregory: +1 Rob Tompkins: +1 Oliver Heger: +1 Thanks to all reviewers. I will start with the tasks to publish the release probably tomorrow. Oliver Am 04.08.2018 um

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3 based on RC2

+1 Oliver Am 04.08.2018 um 21:19 schrieb Oliver Heger: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements > since Apache Commons Configuration 2.2 was released, so I would like to > release Apache Commons Configuration 2.3. > > Apache Commons Config

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.8 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. One minor nit: I was a bit confused by the sentence in the release notes "Lang 3.0 and onwards now targets Java 5.0...". This sounds as if the minimum Java requirement was 5.0. A bit later it is correctly stated

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Configuration 2.3 Released

, patches, or suggestions for improvement, see the Apache Commons Configuration website: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-configuration/ Oliver Heger, on behalf of the Apache Commons community - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.5.0 based on RC1

Build works fine on Windows 10 with Java 8. Artifacts and site look good. +1 I noticed the following things: * In the first sentence of RELEASE-NOTES.txt the version has a -SNAPSHOT. * In README.txt it is stated that "DBCP version 2 requires JDK 1.7.". This is not true for version 2.5. * I had

Re: [LANG] Java 9 problems because of dependencies to java.desktop (Was: Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0)

backward compatibility >> changed, we must deprecate the existing classes >> [ ] release a new version of lang with this new interface and the >> updated circuit breakers[ ] and either delete the deprecated classes >> or leave it until for some more releases >> I won

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.5.0 based on RC1

Am 16.07.2018 um 02:17 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Thank you for your review; more below. > ' > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:20 PM Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> Build works fine on Windows 10 with Java 8. Artifacts and site look good. >> >> +1 >> >> I no

Re: [LANG] Java 9 problems because of dependencies to java.desktop (Was: Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0)

> Subject: Re: [LANG] Java 9 problems because of dependencies to java.desktop > (Was: Re: [LANG] Thoughts about Lang 4.0) > > > > Good spot. I think that means [lang] would have to have its own copy > of the JDK interfaces. or just deprecate the functionality without > replacement.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Collections 4.2 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Only one minor nit: On the site under Project Reports there is an empty japicmp report. Oliver Am 08.07.2018 um 16:04 schrieb Gary Gregory: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements >

Re: [ALL] Where should an OrderedObservable live in Commons?

Am 10.07.2018 um 19:13 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Yeah, I dislike *Util names as well, it's not only a co-out but an > encouragement to make such classes dumping-grounds/kitchen-sinks. > > I was thinking [lang] or maybe [collections] but it's not a collection > really. As the implementation is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.6.0 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 One minor point I noticed is that the release notes say that "Version 2 requires JDK level 1.6 or above", but the minimum JDK for 2.6 is 1.7. There are also a few checkstyle errors that could be fixed with not too much

Re: snapshot packaging?

Hi, Am 11.04.2018 um 10:42 schrieb Claude Warren: > Greetings, > > Is the snapshot packaging for commons configuration2 available for download > / maven? AFAIK, there are no nightly builds that are deployed automatically; but it is possible to deploy snapshot builds manually to the Apache Maven

Re: [configuration] RDF configuration serialization format

Hi Claude, (Note that I have added the component name to the subject because this is a shared list.) Am 11.04.2018 um 10:49 schrieb Claude Warren: > Greetings, > > I have been using commons configuration2 for sometime with apache jena. > The RDF format has many of the same properties of the XML

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git

Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matt Sicker: > Wow, us "legacy" projects really need to keep up to date with these > requirements. GitBox, no CMS (I think we're using svnpubsub everywhere, but > this could also use gitpubsub with an asf-site branch), etc. Would it reduce overhead if we converted

Re: [compress] Need Help With PAX Exam Tests

Hi, Am 23.04.2018 um 22:21 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > Hi all > > I'm trying to resolve COMPRESS-443 which talks about having a regression > test that fails if we break the OSGi bundle again (has already happened > three times duing the life of Compress so far). But unfortunately I'm > getting

Re: [VOTE] Migrate existing Git repos to GitBox

+1 Oliver Am 22.04.2018 um 19:07 schrieb Matt Sicker: > This is a vote to migrate existing Git repositories from the old git-wip-us > infrastructure to the new gitbox infrastructure. New Apache projects are > not allowed to use git-wip-us and are instead directed to use gitbox. As > such, it

Re: Discuss [VOTE] Migrate Commons Weaver to Git

mpkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Oliver Heger < >> oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 20.04.2018 um 19:08 schrie

Re: [httpclient] Better user agent header?

Wrong mailing list, guys? Http Client is not part of Apache Commons. Oliver Am 30.03.2018 um 18:44 schrieb Mark Thomas: > On 30/03/18 12:22, ajs6f wrote: >> For at least some cases, this wouldn't be good for security. > > That is debatable. > > Providing exact version information is highly

Re: [configuration] Java 8 types

Am 29.03.2018 um 15:54 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Done. > > Gary > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >>> Hi All: >>> >>> I say it is time to

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Text 1.3 based on RC1

Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8. Artifacts and site look good. So +1. Minor nit: The site has a japicmp report which is just an empty page. Oliver Am 16.03.2018 um 16:35 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > Hello all, > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Text 1.3 (from RC1). > > Tag

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

Am 02.03.2018 um 15:45 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Otto Fowler wrote: > >> I don’t understand the options that we are discussing here. Can we >> clarify? >> >> * create a new component from sirota, bringing it into commons ( resurrect >>

Re: [compress] High Level API for Archives

Am 26.04.2018 um 17:37 schrieb Matt Sicker: > If it helps in design, the most promising approach I found was to integrate > with the java.nio.file API. However, that turns into a sort of hybrid > library between VFS and Compress. However, they are rather strongly related > (if the two libraries

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.8.1 based on RC1

Hi Rob, build works fine with Java 8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Some remarks: - When running mvn site it did an SVN checkout to a folder named site-content. What is the background of this? - The japicmp report on the site you referenced looks pretty strange - given the fact

Re: [jira] [Deleted] (COMMONSSITE-126) Menghapus klien bugs

Any chance this guy can be blocked? There has been similar spam like this for other projects. Oliver Am 25.09.2018 um 15:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter (JIRA): > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ]

Re: [configuration] Update from java 7 to Java 8.

Am 27.09.2018 um 19:27 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Hi All: > > I'd like to update [configuration] from java 7 to Java 8. Just go on. I think it was consensus that after the latest release the Java version should be upgraded. Oliver > > Gary >

Re: svn commit: r1842139 - in /commons/proper/configuration/trunk: pom.xml src/changes/changes.xml src/main/java/org/apache/commons/configuration2/interpol/ConfigurationInterpolator.java src/main/java

Am 27.09.2018 um 20:43 schrieb ggreg...@apache.org: > Author: ggregory > Date: Thu Sep 27 18:43:37 2018 > New Revision: 1842139 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1842139=rev > Log: > [CONFIGURATION-720] Replace use of deprecated Commons Lang string > substitution code for Commons

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] move commons git-wip repos to gitbox

+1 Oliver Am 08.12.2018 um 21:09 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > Infra stated that we need documented consensus on this. So, let’s have at it. > > I propose that we move the following repos over to gitbox: > > commons-build-plugin.git 11 weeks ago > commons-cli.git30 weeks ago >

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move all proper svn repos to gitbox

+1 Oliver Am 08.01.19 um 17:25 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > Vote statement: "I propose we move all ‘proper' svn repos to gitbox." > > I went though, and I think these are the ones that need to be migrated: > > bcel/ > beanutils/ > bsf/ > chain/ > codec/ > commons-parent/ > commons-skin (???) >

Re: [VOTE] Redirect github notifications to issues@

+1 Oliver Am 19.02.19 um 22:35 schrieb Marcelo Vanzin: > I'm opening a vote based on recent discussions about the extra noise > generated by github updates going to dev@. So please vote: > > - +1 to redirect github updates of all commons repos to the issues@ list > - -1 to keep things as is >

Re: [Configuration] Optional Includes in Properties files

Am 20.05.19 um 16:19 schrieb sebb: > On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 14:58, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:16 AM Gilles Sadowski >> wrote: >> >>> Le lun. 20 mai 2019 à 14:51, Gary Gregory a >>> écrit : Hi All: Right now, if you uses an 'include' in a

Re: [lang] Deamon thread factory

Hi, BasicThreadFactory has an option to create daemon threads. I assume, you have found out in the meantime? Oliver Am 01.05.19 um 23:07 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Hi All, > > Hard to believe, but we do not have one yet. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1455 > > Assigned to your

Re: [compress] What to do with the changed OSGi Bundle Name?

Am 02.01.20 um 12:08 schrieb Bruno P. Kinoshita: > Also not a user of OSGi. But I feel like it is a bug that could be reverted > and informed in the changelog and release email? > But not too sure if that's the best option. > Bruno > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Thu, 2 Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.7 based on RC2

+1 Build works fine with Java 8, artifacts and site look good. Oliver Am 09.03.20 um 15:55 schrieb Rob Tompkins: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since > Apache Commons Configuration 2.6 was released, so I would like to release > Apache Commons

[CVE-2020-1953] Uncontrolled class instantiation when loading YAML files in Apache Commons Configuration

processor. Credit: This issue was discovered by Daniel Kalinowski of ISEC.pl Research Team Oliver Heger on behalf of the Apache Commons PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.7 based on RC1

Hi Rob, many thanks for working on the release. I also did a check. The builds of the jar and the site were successful with the configuration below. Artifacts and site look good. The NOTICE file has still a copyright year of 2019; so if you re-roll the RC, you should adapt this. Otherwise, I

Re: [CVE-2020-1953] Uncontrolled class instantiation when loading YAML files in Apache Commons Configuration

The form at Mitre was just submitted, so I assume that the issue will be visible soon. Oliver Am 12.03.20 um 19:18 schrieb Gary Gregory: > Note that https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-1953 is not > "live" yet. > > Gary > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at

[CLI] CLI for Scala

Hi all, once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC, there were no strong objections, but there has never been a follow up. For a project in Scala, I needed some limited functionality to process command

[ALL][CLI] CLI for Scala

Resending with a different subject to potentially reach a broader audience. Am 17.09.20 um 21:47 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether > Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, too. IIRC, > there

Re: [CLI] CLI for Scala

Hi Gilles, Am 20.09.20 um 19:44 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: > Hello. > > 2020-09-17 21:47 UTC+02:00, Oliver Heger : >> Hi all, >> >> once we had a discussion (it must be one or two years ago) whether >> Commons could support components in other (JVM) languages, t

Re: [all] Dependabot PRs

Am 22.07.20 um 18:28 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > On 2020-07-22, Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> I’m happy to merge them….will get to them by tomorrow morning ok? > > TBH I'd prefer to turn them off and reject the PRs. > > Personally I don't see any value for our downstream users if we update > our

Re: The case for a Commons component

Am 05.05.21 um 21:54 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger a écrit : Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component That's

Re: [compress] [Poll] Dealing with uncaught RuntimeExceptions

Am 30.06.21 um 14:41 schrieb Gary Gregory: On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 4:24 PM Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi I'm sorry, but I'm unable to see what would or would not work for the people who chimed in. Short of calling for a vote, lets try with a poll that could show whether there is some sort of

Re: The case for a Commons component

Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory a écrit : IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component That's certainly true. And nobody is forced to do anything. When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only

<    5   6   7   8   9   10