Hi SCXML community,
I'd like to propose dropping Ant build support for the next major SCXML version
1.0, which development now has been reactivated on trunk.
Both Woonsan and myself are 'Maven' adepts, and have no use nor interest in
maintaining and updating/fixing the already outdated Ant
Douma a...@douma.nu
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 5:43 PM
Subject: [SCXML] Proposal - drop Ant build support
Hi SCXML community,
I'd like to propose dropping Ant build support for the next major SCXML
version
1.0, which development
Le 14/10/2013 22:51, Bruno P. Kinoshita a écrit :
I'm +1 for this, but I think there are components that need this ant build
for Debian packages... probably someone else can chime in and confirm if
that's the case for scxml.
I did say the Ant build was used for some Debian packages, but
Am 14.10.2013, 23:22 Uhr, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org:
I did say the Ant build was used for some Debian packages, but scxml
isn't in Debian yet and I'm updating the packages to use Maven instead.
So go for it.
Do you use a deb-builder script or similiar to package those or do you
Le 14/10/2013 23:38, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit :
Do you use a deb-builder script or similiar to package those or do you
use unix:deb or assembly for that inside maven?
For the official packages I use maven-repo-helper [1] and
maven-debian-helper [2]. It configures Maven to run in offline mode
