Am 20.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Honton, Charles:
snip
This obviously makes the concurrency problem easier :)
Apart from this case, it would be good to agree on exactly what it
means for [configuration] to be threadsafe. Is it basically the
semantics of ConcurrentHashmap? Or are there
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
[snip]
However, what also bugs me in the meantime is the current hard relation
between the configuration object and its format. Why should I care at all
in what format the
On 9/19/12 1:19 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Phil,
Am 18.09.2012 20:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions
snip
This obviously makes the concurrency problem easier :)
Apart from this case, it would be good to agree on exactly what it
means for [configuration] to be threadsafe. Is it basically the
semantics of ConcurrentHashmap? Or are there sequencing / event
serialization constraints? For
Hi Phil,
Am 18.09.2012 20:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the
incomplete
support
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the
incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects.
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like to start a discussion. Here they are
