: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?
Hi all,
Any objections to removing serialization from [functor]?
Here's why I
think
we should drop it:
* It's been discussed in the mailing list in the past about
other
components
dropping support
To: Commons List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?
Hi all,
Any objections to removing serialization from [functor]? Here's why I
think
we should drop it:
* It's been discussed
http://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com
- Original Message -
From: Bruno P. Kinoshita ki...@apache.org
To: Commons List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?
Hi all
://kinoshita.eti.br
http://tupilabs.com
- Original Message -
From: Bruno P. Kinoshita ki...@apache.org
To: Commons List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?
Hi all,
Any objections
brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br
To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 1:55 PM
Subject: [functor] Keep Serializable in [functor] or drop it?
Hi all,
I was writing some tests for [functor] when I found that one of my tests was
failing
Hi all,
I was writing some tests for [functor] when I found that one of my tests
was failing with a NotSerializableException. The test uses a class that
extends PredicatedLoop. This class contains a Procedure and a Predicate
member fields, which are not serializable.
I remember seeing some
